The World Health Organization (WHO) hearing impairment guidelines and a speech recognition in noise (SRN) disorder

References

• Abel, S. M., P. W. Alberti, C. Haythornthwaite, and K. Riko. 1982. “Speech Intelligibility in Noise: Effects of Fluency and Hearing Protector Type.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71 (3): 708–715. doi:10.1121/1.387547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvord, L. S. 1983. “Cochlear Dysfunction in "Normal-Hearing" Patients with History of Noise Exposure.” Ear and Hearing 4 (5): 247–250. doi:10.1097/00003446-198309000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., A. Parbery-Clark, T. White-Schwoch, and N. Kraus. 2013. “Auditory Brainstem Response to Complex Sounds Predicts Self-Reported Speech-in-Noise Performance.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 56 (1): 31–43. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0043).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., E. Skoe, B. Chandrasekaran, and N. Kraus. 2010. “Neural Timing is Linked to Speech Perception in Noise.” The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 30 (14): 4922–4926. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0107-10.2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, P. M., J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. M. Irwig, D. Moher, D. Rennie, H. C. de Vet, and J. G. Lijmer, Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group 2003. “The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group.” Croatian Medical Journal 44 (5): 639–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradlow, A. R., G. M. Torretta, and D. B. Pisoni. 1996. “Intelligibility of Normal Speech I: Global and Fine-Grained Acoustic-Phonetic Talker Characteristics.” Speech Communication 20 (3): 255–272. doi:10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, A. J., and C. Laroche. 2012. “Noise and Communication: A Three-Year Update.” Noise & Health 14 (61): 281–286. doi:10.4103/1463-1741.104894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, R., and J. F. Jerger. 1959. “Preferred Method for Clinical Determination of Pure-Tone Thresholds.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 24 (4): 330–345. doi:10.1044/jshd.2404.330.
   Google Scholar
• Etymotic. 2005. Bamford-Kowal-Bench Speech-in-Noise Test (Version 1.03) [Audio CD].
   Google Scholar
• Fry, D. B. 1942. “A Suggestion for a New Method of Testing Hearing in Aviation Candidates.” The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 57 (1): 11–13. doi:10.1017/S0022215100044339.
   Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E. 2019a. “Examining the Validity of the World Health Organization's Long-Standing Hearing Impairment Grading System for Unaided Communication in Age-Related Hearing Loss.” American Journal of Audiology 28 (3S): 810–818. doi:10.1044/2018_AJA-HEAL18-18-0155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes, L. E. 2019b. “The World Health Organization's Hearing-Impairment Grading System: An Evaluation for Unaided Communication in Age-Related Hearing Loss.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (1): 12–20. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1518598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, M. C., P. A. Niquette, G. I. Gudmundsen, L. J. Revit, and S. Banerjee. 2004. “Development of a Quick Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4 Pt 1): 2395–2405. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15532670. doi:10.1121/1.1784440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeflang, M. M., A. W. Rutjes, J. B. Reitsma, L. Hooft, and P. M. Bossuyt. 2013. “Variation of a Test's Sensitivity and Specificity with Disease Prevalence.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 185 (11): E537–E544. doi:10.1503/cmaj.121286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathers, C., A. Smith, and M. Concha. 2000. “Global Burden of Hearing Loss in the Year 2000.” Global Burden of Disease 18: 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Middelweerd, M. J., J. M. Festen, and R. Plomp. 1990. “Difficulties with speech intelligibility in Noise in Spite of a Normal Pure-Tone Audiogram.” Audiology: official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 29 (1): 1–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2310349. doi:10.3109/00206099009081640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8132902. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology: Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/760724. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saunders, G. H., A. Forsline, and S. A. Fausti. 2004. “The Performance-Perceptual Test and Its Relationship to Unaided Reported Handicap.” Ear and Hearing 25 (2): 117–126. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15064656. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000120360.05510.E5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shield, B. M., and J. E. Dockrell. 2008. “The Effects of Environmental and Classroom Noise on the Academic Attainments of Primary School Children.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (1): 133–144. doi:10.1121/1.2812596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., T. S. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2004. “Development and Validation of an Automatic Speech-in-Noise Screening Test by Telephone.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (1): 15–28. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14974624. doi:10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, G., S. Flaxman, E. Brunskill, M. Mascarenhas, C. D. Mathers, M. Finucane, and G. Global Burden Of Disease Hearing Loss Expert, Global Burden of Disease Hearing Loss Expert Group. 2013. “Global and Regional Hearing Impairment Prevalence: An Analysis of 42 Studies in 29 Countries.” European Journal of Public Health 23 (1): 146–152. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckr176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A., R. M. Dawes, and J. Monahan. 2000. “Better Decisions through Science.” Scientific American 283 (4): 82–87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11011389. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1000-82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J. 2008. “The American English Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 386–387. doi:10.1080/14992020801908251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J. 2014. “On the Clinical Entity in Audiology: (Central) Auditory Processing and Speech Recognition in Noise Disorders.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 25 (9): 904–917. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.9.11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J. 2018. “The Gold Standard and Auditory Processing Disorder.” Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups 3 (6): 6–17. doi:10.1044/persp3.SIG6.6.
   Google Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J., C. C. Herring, P. Heeke, C. E. Post, and X. Fang. 2019. “Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (01): 054–065. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17083.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J., S. D. Soli, and X. Fang. 2018. “An Argument for Self-Report as a Reference Standard in Audiology.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (03): 206–222. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J., S. D. Soli, D. J. Freed, and X. Fang. 2020. “The Effect of Stimulus Audibility on the Relationship between Pure-Tone Average and Speech Recognition in Noise Ability.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31 (03): 224–232. doi:10.3766/jaaa.19031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vermiglio, A. J., S. D. Soli, D. J. Freed, and L. M. Fisher. 2012. “The Relationship between High-Frequency Pure-Tone Hearing Loss, Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) Thresholds, and the Articulation Index.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (10): 779–788. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.10.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, C., S. Arndt, J. B. Firszt, B. Fraysse, P. T. Kitterick, B. C. Papsin, A. Snik, P. Van de Heyning, O. Deguine, and M. Marx. 2015. “Identification and Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Candidates with Asymmetrical Hearing Loss.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 20 (Suppl 1): 87–89. doi:10.1159/000380754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 1991. Report of the Informal Working Group on Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment Programme Planning. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2021. World Report on Hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H. 2003. “Development of a Speech-in-Multitalker-Babble Paradigm to Assess Word-Recognition Performance.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (9): 453–470. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14708835. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1715938.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., R. A. McArdle, and S. L. Smith. 2007. “An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN Materials on Listeners with Normal Hearing and Listeners with Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 50 (4): 844–856. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar