Premium versus entry-level hearing aids: using group concept mapping to investigate the drivers of preference

References

• Alexander, J. M., and V. Rallapalli. 2017. “Acoustic and Perceptual Effects of Amplitude and Frequency Compression on High-Frequency Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (2): 908–923. doi:10.1121/1.4997938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amlani, A. M., B. Rakerd, and J. L. Punch. 2006. “Speech-Clarity Judgments of Hearing-Aid-Processed Speech in Noise: Differing Polar Patterns and Acoustic Environments: Juicios Sobre la Claridad Del Lenguaje en Ruido Procesado Por un Auxiliar Auditivo: Distinguiendo Patrones Polares y Ambientes Acústicos.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (6): 319–330. doi:10.1080/14992020600582109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumfield, A., and H. Dillon. 2001. “Factors Affecting the Use and Perceived Benefit of ITE and BTE Hearing Aids.” British Journal of Audiology 35 (4): 247–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B 57 (1): 289–300. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, B. 2019. “Improve Your Patients’ Hearing Aid Management Skills.” The Hearing Journal 72 (4): 20. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000557746.12905.5a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett, R. J., C. J. Meyer, R. H. Eikelboom, and M. D. Atlas. 2018. “Investigating the Knowledge, Skills, and Tasks Required for Hearing Aid Management: Perspectives of Clinicians and Hearing Aid Owners.” American Journal of Audiology 27 (1): 67–84. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-17-0059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, R. A., D. P. Niebuhr, T. A. Johnson, and G. A. Flamme. 2003. “Impact of Digital Labeling on Outcome Measures.” Ear and Hearing 24 (3): 215–224. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000069228.46916.92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, R., Y.-H. Wu, J. Kettel, and R. Hurtig. 2008. “Digital Noise Reduction: Outcomes from Laboratory and Field Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (8): 447–460. doi:10.1080/14992020802033091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., J. Mejia, K. Freeston, R. J. van Hoesel, and H. Dillon. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Performance of Two Binaural Beamformers in Complex and Dynamic Multitalker Environments.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (10): 727–735. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1059502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boymans, M., and W. A. Dreschler. 2012. “Audiologist-Driven versus Patient-Driven Fine Tuning of Hearing Instruments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1177/1084713811424884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brand, T., and V. Hohmann. 2002. “An Adaptive Procedure for Categorical Loudness Scaling.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (4): 1597–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratzke, L. C., R. J. Muehrer, K. A. Kehl, K. S. Lee, E. C. Ward, and K. L. Kwekkeboom. 2015. “Self-Management Priority Setting and Decision-Making in Adults with Multimorbidity: A Narrative Review of Literature.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 52 (3): 744–755. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, P. F., and I. Strombom. 1998. “Improving Health Care by Understanding Patient Preferences: The Role of Computer Technology.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 5 (3): 257–262. doi:10.1136/jamia.1998.0050257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Effects of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Perceived Listening Effort, and Personal Preference in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 18: 233121651455392. doi:10.1177/2331216514553924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheesman, M. F., and D. G. Jamieson. 1996. “Development, Evaluation and Scoring of a Nonsense Word Test Suitable for Use with Speakers of Canadian English.” Canadian Acoustics 24 (1): 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., G. C. Alexander, and C. Gilmore. 1987. “Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).” Ear and Hearing 8 (5 Suppl): 119S–126s. doi:10.1097/00003446-198710001-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., J. A. Johnson, and J. Xu. 2016. “Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life I: The Patients' Perspective.” Ear Hear 37 (4): e224–e237. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, P., R. Hopkins, and K. J. Munro. 2013. “Placebo Effects in Hearing-Aid Trials Are Reliable.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 472–477. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.783718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohoe, Jessica, Margaret O'Rourke, Sean Hammond, Slavi Stoyanov, and Colm O'Tuathaigh. 2020. “Strategies for Enhancing Resilience in Medical Students: A Group Concept Mapping Analysis.” Academic Psychiatry 44 (4): 427–431. doi:10.1007/s40596-020-01208-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, I., K. Swedberg, C. Taft, A. Lindseth, A. Norberg, E. Brink, J. Carlsson, et al. 2011. “Person-Centered Care-Ready for Prime Time.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 10 (4): 248–251. doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2011.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, A., and H. Sjögren. 1979. “Perceived Sound Quality of sound-reproducing systems.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65 (4): 1019–1033. doi:10.1121/1.382579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson, A., B. N. Schenkman, and B. Hagerman. 1988. “The Effects of Different Frequency Responses on Sound Quality Judgments and Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 31 (2): 166–177. doi:10.1044/jshr.3102.166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S. 2002. “Electronic Aids to Hearing.” British Medical Bulletin 63 (1): 147–156. doi:10.1093/bmb/63.1.147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gioia, C., M. Ben-Akiva, M. Kirkegaard, O. Jørgensen, K. Jensen, and D. Schum. 2015. “Case Factors Affecting Hearing Aid Recommendations by Hearing Care Professionals.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (3): 229–246. doi:10.3766/jaaa.26.3.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glista, D., R. O’Hagan, S. Moodie, and S. Scollie. 2021. “An Examination of Clinical Uptake Factors for Remote Hearing Aid Support: A Concept Mapping Study with Audiologists.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (Suppl. 1): S13–S10. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1795281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goyette, A., J. Crukley, and J. Galster. 2018. “The Effects of Varying Directional Bandwidth in Hearing Aid Users' Preference and Speech-in-Noise Performance.” American Journal of Audiology 27 (1): 95–103. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-17-0063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, A. E., and G. A. Aarons. 2011. “A Comparison of Policy and Direct Practice Stakeholder Perceptions of Factors Affecting Evidence-Based Practice Implementation Using Concept Mapping.” Implementation Science 6 (1): 104. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, L., S. Clutterbuck, and A. Khan. 2010. “Factors Associated with Hearing Aid fi Tting Outcomes on the IOI-HA.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (8): 586–595. doi:10.3109/14992021003777259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E. 2003. “Modeling and Predicting Hearing Aid Outcome.” Trends in Amplification 7 (2): 41–75. doi:10.1177/108471380300700202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes, L. E., S. E. Rogers, T. M. Quigley, A. K. Main, D. L. Kinney, and C. Herring. 2017. “The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (1): 53–79. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaarsma, T., L. Klompstra, C. F. Ski, and D. R. Thompson. 2018. “Preference-Based Care and Research.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 17 (1): 4–5. doi:10.1177/1474515117714349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. A., J. Xu, and R. M. Cox. 2016. “Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 37 (5): 529–540. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joukes, E., R. Cornet, M. C. de Bruijne, and N. F. de Keizer. 2016. “Eliciting End-User Expectations to Guide the Implementation Process of a New Electronic Health Record: A Case Study Using Concept Mapping.” International Journal of Medical Informatics 87: 111–117. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M., and W. Trochim. 2007. Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation (Vol. 50). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2000. “MarkeTrak V: “Why my Hearing Aids Are in the Drawer.” The Consumers’ Perspective 53 (2): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2005. “MarkeTrak VII: Customer Satisfaction with Hearing Instruments in the Digital Age.” The Hearing Journal 58 (9): 30. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286545.33961.e7.
   Google Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2007. “Increasing Hearing Aid Adoption through Multiple Environmental Listening Utility.” The Hearing Journal 60 (11): 28–31. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000299169.03743.33.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruskal, J. B., and M. Wish. 1978. Multidimensional Scaling (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, M., S. Hickey, and S. Shaw. 2000. “Manual Dexterity and Successful Hearing Aid Use.” The Journal of Laryngology and Otology 114 (8): 593–597. doi:10.1258/0022215001906480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansbergen, S., and W. A. Dreschler. 2020. “Classification of Hearing Aids into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.” Ear & Hearing 41 (6): 1619–1634. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplege, A., F. Gzil, M. Cammelli, C. Lefeve, B. Pachoud, and I. Ville. 2007. “Person-Centredness: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives.” Disability and Rehabilitation 29 (20-21): 1555–1565. doi:10.1080/09638280701618661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupsakko, T. A., H. J. Kautiainen, and R. Sulkava. 2005. “The Non-Use of Hearing Aids in People Aged 75 Years and over in the City of Kuopio in Finland.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 262 (3): 165–169. doi:10.1007/s00405-004-0789-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D. W., Y. H. K. Ali, and M. A. Ferguson. 2019. “Applying the COM-B Model to Assess the Usability of Smartphone-Connected Listening Devices in Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (5): 417–430. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, D. A., J. M. Gonzalez, K. V. MacDonald, and F. R. Johnson. 2017. “Estimating Preferences for Complex Health Technologies: Lessons Learned and Implications for Personalized Medicine.” Value in Health 20 (1): 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., J. Alexander, M. A. Brennan, B. Hoover, J. Kopun, and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2014. “The Influence of Audibility on Speech Recognition with Nonlinear Frequency Compression for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 35 (4): 440–447. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., R. A. Bentler, and P. A. Roush. 2013. “Characteristics of Hearing Aid Fittings in Infants and Young Children.” Ear and Hearing 34 (6): 701–710. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828f1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister, H., I. Lausberg, M. Walger, and H. von Wedel. 2001. “Using Conjoint Analysis to Examine the Importance of Hearing Aid Attributes.” Ear and Hearing 22 (2): 142–150. doi:10.1097/00003446-200104000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., L. Hickson, and A. Fletcher. 2014. “Identifying the Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Hearing Aid Self-Efficacy.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (Suppl. 1): S28–S37. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.832420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C., L. Hickson, A. Khan, and D. Walker. 2014. “What is Important for Hearing Aid Satisfaction? Application of the Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 25 (7): 644–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. M., and F. M. Kramer. 1996. “Women’s and Men’s Preferences for Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Features.” Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 16 (3): 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Mulley, A. G., C. Trimble, and G. Elwyn. 2012. “Stop the Silent Misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter.” BMJ 345: e6572–e6572. doi:10.1136/bmj.e6572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, G. 2016. “Theoretical Issues of Validity in the Measurement of Aided Speech Reception Threshold in Noise for Comparing Nonlinear Hearing Aid Systems.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 504–514. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T. 2014. “Relating Hearing Loss and Executive Functions to Hearing Aid users' preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 391. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. C. Wagener. 2016. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651665579. doi:10.1177/2331216516655794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. H., P. Hagell, and C. Sjödahl Hammarlund. 2012. “Measuring Outcomes in Parkinson's disease: a multi-perspective concept mapping study.” Quality of Life Research 21 (3): 453–463. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9995-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, C., R. Bentler, and G. H. Mueller. 2006. “Evaluation of a Second-Order Directional Microphone Hearing Aid: II. Self-Report Outcomes.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (3): 190–201. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.3.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M. 2020. “MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) Survey Results Demonstrate High Satisfaction with and Benefits from Hearing Aids.” Seminars in Hearing 41 (1): 21–36. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1701243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picou, E. M., E. Aspell, and T. A. Ricketts. 2014. “Potential Benefits and Limitations of Three Types of Directional Processing in Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 35 (3): 339–352. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poost-Foroosh, L., M. B. Jennings, L. Shaw, C. N. Meston, and M. F. Cheesman. 2011. “Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.” Trends in Amplification 15 (3): 127–139. doi:10.1177/1084713811430217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T. A., and B. W. Y. Hornsby. 2005. “Sound Quality Measures for Speech in Noise through a Commercial Hearing Aid Implementing “Digital Noise Reduction.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (5): 270–277. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.5.2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosas, S. R., and M. Kane. 2012. “Quality and Rigor of the Concept Mapping Methodology: A Pooled Study Analysis.” Evaluation and Program Planning 35 (2): 236–245. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh, H. K., P. Folkeard, E. Macpherson, and S. Scollie. 2020. “Adaptation of the Connected Speech Test: Rerecording and Passage Equivalency.” American Journal of Audiology 29 (2): 259–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber, B. E., C. Agrup, D. O. Haskard, and L. M. Luxon. 2010. “Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.”  The Lancet 375 (9721): 1203–1211.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.,. R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford. 2005. “The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4): 159–197. doi:10.1177/108471380500900403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjödahl Hammarlund, C., M. H. Nilsson, and P. Hagell. 2012. “Measuring Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease: A Multi-Perspective Concept Mapping Study .” Quality of Life Research 21 (3): 453–463. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9995-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim, J., C. Gay, and L. Hickson. 2018. “Older Adults’ Experiences and Issues with Hearing Aids in the First Six Months after Hearing Aid Fitting.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (1): 31–39. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1380849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A "Rationalized" Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Surr, R., B. Walden, M. Cord, and L. Olson. 2002. “Influence of Environmental Factors on Hearing Aid Microphone Preference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 13 (6): 308–322.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trochim, W. 1993. The reliability of concept mapping. Annual conference of the American Evaluation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. 1989. “An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation.” Evaluation and Program Planning 12 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M., and D. McLinden. 2017. “Introduction to a Special Issue on Concept Mapping.” Evaluation and Program Planning 60: 166–175. doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.10.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M., H. Abrams, D. Benson, T. Chisolm, D. Citron, D. Hampton, and R. Sweetow. 2006. “Audiologic management of adult hearing impairment.” Audiology Today 18 (5): 32–36.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., K. Oeding, A. Brockmeyer, S. Smith, and D. Kallogjeri. 2018. “Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (8): 16.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeckhoutte, M., P. Folkeard, D. Glista, and S. Scollie. 2020a. “Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference with Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aids for Adult Hearing Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 59 (10): 780–712. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1750718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eeckhoutte, Maaike, Susan Scollie, Robin O'Hagan, and Danielle Glista. 2020b. “Perceptual Benefits of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aids with Children: A within-Subject Design Using Clinically Available Hearing Aids.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63 (11): 3834–3846. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eeckhoutte, M., J. Wouters, and T. Francart. 2016. “Auditory Steady-State Responses as Neural Correlates of Loudness Growth.” Hearing Research 342: 58–68. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.09.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden, B. E., R. K. Surr, K. W. Grant, W. Van Summers, M. T. Cord, and O. Dyrlund. 2005. “Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Directional Microphone Benefit and Preference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (9): 662–676. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.9.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waltz, T. J., B. J. Powell, M. M. Matthieu, L. J. Damschroder, M. J. Chinman, J. L. Smith, E. K. Proctor, and J. E. Kirchner. 2015. “Use of Concept Mapping to Characterize Relationships among Implementation Strategies and Assess Their Feasibility and Importance: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) Study.” Implementation Science 10 (1): 109. doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, Blake S., Debara L. Tucci, Michael H. Merson, and Gerard M. O'Donoghue. 2017. “Global Hearing Health Care: New Findings and Perspectives.” The Lancet 390 (10111): 2503–2515. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31073-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, S. H., E. C. Y. Chan, R. Harris, S. L. Sheridan, C. H. Braddock, R. M. Kaplan, A. Krist, A. M. O’Connor, and S. Tunis. 2005. “Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care to Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making.” Annals of Internal Medicine 143 (4): 293–300. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-4-200508160-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., and R. A. Bentler. 2010a. “Impact of Visual Cues on Directional Benefit and Preference: Part II-field tests.” Ear and Hearing 31 (1): 35–46. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bc769b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., and R. A. Bentler. 2010b. “Impact of Visual Cues on Directional Benefit and Preference: Part I-laboratory tests.” Ear and Hearing 31 (1): 22–34. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181bc767e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y.-H., E. Stangl, O. Chipara, S. S. Hasan, S. DeVries, and J. Oleson. 2019. “Efficacy and Effectiveness of Advanced Hearing Aid Directional and Noise Reduction Technologies for Older Adults with Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 40 (4): 805–822. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, D., X. Shi, S. Nicholas, X. Ye, S. Chen, and P. He. 2020. “Preferences for Hearing Aid Attributes among People with Moderate or Greater Hearing Loss in Rural China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.” Patient Preference and Adherence 14: 643–652. doi:10.2147/PPA.S248522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar