Comparisons of electrophysiological and psychophysical fitting methods for cochlear implants

References

• Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v67/i01/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros, A., R. Banna, and S. Maruthurkkara. 2013. “The Next Generation of Nucleus(®) Fitting: A Multiplatform Approach Towards Universal Cochlear Implant Management.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 485–494. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.781277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros, A., and C. Psarros. 2010. “Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: I. The Relevance of ECAP Threshold Profiles and Scaled Profiles to Cochlear Implant Fitting.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3): 367–379. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fd86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C. J., M. L. Hughes, B. Luk, P. J. Abbas, A. Wolaver, and J. Gervais. 2000. “The Relationship between EAP and EABR Thresholds and Levels Used to Program the Nucleus 24 Speech Processor: Data from Adults.” Ear and Hearing 21 (2): 151–163. doi:10.1097/00003446-200004000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, P. A., and K. Arora. 2016. “Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 37 (3): 303–311. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-201605000-00007. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock, L., H. Cooper, P. van de Heyning, K. Vermeire, M. Davies, J. Patel, H. Cullington, et al. 2003. “Comparison Between NRT-Based MAPs and Behaviourally Measured MAPs at Different Stimulation Rates-A Multicentre Investigation.” Cochlear Implants International 4 (4): 161–170. doi:10.1179/cim.2003.4.4.161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Graaff, Feike, Birgit I. Lissenberg-Witte, Marre W. Kaandorp, Paul Merkus, S. Theo Goverts, Sophia E. Kramer, Cas Smits, et al. 2020. “Relationship Between Speech Recognition in Quiet and Noise and Fitting Parameters, Impedances and ECAP Thresholds in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 41 (4): 935–947. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vos, Johan J., Jan Dirk Biesheuvel, Jeroen J. Briaire, Pieter S. Boot, Margriet J. van Gendt, Olaf M. Dekkers, Marta Fiocco, et al. 2018. “Use of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials for Cochlear Implant Fitting: A Systematic Review.” Ear and Hearing 39 (3): 401–411. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-201805000-00001. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajadeera, E. A., K. L. Galvin, R. C. Dowell, and P. A. Busby. 2017a. “Investigation of Electrical Stimulation Levels Over 8 to 10 Years Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using Cochlear Implants.” Ear & Hearing 38 (6): 736–745. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-201711000-00011. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajadeera, E. A., K. L. Galvin, R. C. Dowell, and P. A. Busby. 2017b. “The Change in Electrical Stimulation Levels during 24 Months Postimplantation for a Large Cohort of Adults Using the Nucleus® Cochlear Implant.” Ear and Hearing 38 (3): 357–367. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-201705000-00009. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15035561. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahlbrock, K. H. 1957. Sprachaudiometrie. Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung einer Sprachaudiometrie für das deutsche Sprachgebiet. Stuttgart: Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Henkin, Yael, Ricky Kaplan-Neeman, Jona Kronenberg, Lela Migirov, Minka Hildesheimer, and Chava Muchnik. 2006. “A Longitudinal Study of Electrical Stimulation Levels and Electrode Impedance in Children Using the Clarion Cochlear Implant.” Acta oto-laryngologica 126 (6): 581–586. doi:10.1080/00016480500443391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkin, Y., R. Kaplan-Neeman, C. Muchnik, J. Kronenberg, and M. Hildesheimer. 2003. “Changes over Time in the Psycho-Electric Parameters in Children with Cochlear Implants: Cambios en el tiempo, de los parámetros psico-eléctricos en niños con implante coclear.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (5): 274–278. doi:10.3109/14992020309078346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 895–902. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti, Paola V., Teresa Y. C. Ching, Sanna Hou, Patricia Van Buynder, Christopher Flynn, and Robert Cowan. 2018. “Programming Characteristics of Cochlear Implants in Children: effects of Aetiology and Age at Implantation.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup2): S27–S40. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1370139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. 1958. “The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 23 (3): 187–200. doi:10.1007/BF02289233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kießling, J., L. Grugel, H. Meister, and M. Meis. 2011. “Übertragung der Fragebögen SADL, ECHO und SSQ ins Deutsche und deren Evaluation [German Translations of Questionnaires SADL, ECHO and SSQ and Their Evaluation]”. Zeitschrift für Audiologie 50 (1): 6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., P. B. Brockhoff, and R. H. B. Christensen. 2017. “Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 82 (13): 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnhardt, E., and R. Laszig. 2009. Praxis der Audiometrie. 9. Aufl. Thieme: Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. 2019. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. https://cran.r-project.org/package=emmeans.
   Google Scholar
• Mosca, F., R. Grassia, and C. A. Leone. 2014. “Longitudinal Variations in Fitting Parameters for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale 34 (2): 111–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J. 2009. Verfahren zur Anpassung und Evaluation von Cochlear Implant Sprachprozessoren [Procedures for Fitting and Evaluation of Cochlear Implant Speech Processors]. Heidelberg: Median Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pedley, Karen, Colleen Psarros, Kirsty Gardner-Berry, Alison Parker, Suzanne C. Purdy, Pam Dawson, Kerrie Plant, et al. 2007. “Evaluation of NRT and Behavioral Measures for MAPping Elderly Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 46 (5): 254–262. doi:10.1080/14992020601014979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, Kerrie, Mary-Ann Law, Lesley Whitford, Michelle Knight, Sylvia Tari, Jaime Leigh, Karen Pedley, et al. 2005. “Evaluation of Streamlined Programming Procedures for the Nucleus Cochlear Implant with the Contour Electrode Array.” Ear and Hearing 26 (6): 651–668. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-200512000-00011. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000188201.86799.01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plesch, J., B. P. Ernst, S. Strieth, and T. Rader. 2019. “A Psychoacoustic Application for the Adjustment of Electrical Hearing Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Patients.” PLoS One 14 (10): e0223625. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, L. G., M. W. Skinner, B. D. Gotter, M. J. Strube, and C. A. Brenner. 2007. “Relation between Neural Response Telemetry Thresholds, T- and C-Levels, and Loudness Judgments in 12 Adult Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear & Hearing 28 (4): 495–511. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-200708000-00007. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc16e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rader, Tobias, Philipp Doms, Youssef Adel, Tobias Weissgerber, Sebastian Strieth, and Uwe Baumann. 2018. “A Method for Determining Precise Electrical Hearing Thresholds in Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (7): 502–509. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1412519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghunandhan, S., A. Ravikumar, M. Kameswaran, K. Mandke, and R. Ranjith. 2014. “A Clinical Study of Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioural Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees.” Cochlear Implants International 15 (3): 145–160. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seyle, K., and C. J. Brown. 2002. “Speech Perception Using Maps Based on Neural Response Telemetry Measures.” Ear and Hearing 23 (1 Suppl): 72S–79S. doi:10.1097/00003446-200202001-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, T. A. Holden, and M. E. Demorest. 1999. “Comparison of Two Methods for Selecting Minimum Stimulation Levels Used in Programming the Nucleus 22 Cochlear Implant.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 42 (4): 814–828. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4204.814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg, G. F., C. Willeboer, and J. E. van Dijk. 2002. “Speech Perception in Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant Users With Processor Settings Based on Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Thresholds.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 7 (6): 335–347. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/66154. doi:10.1159/000066154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thai-Van, Hung, Eric Truy, Basile Charasse, Florent Boutitie, Jean-Marc Chanal, Nadine Cochard, Jean-Pierre Piron, et al. 2004. “Modeling the Relationship Between Psychophysical Perception and Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Threshold in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients: Clinical Implications for Implant Fitting.” Clinical Neurophysiology : Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 115 (12): 2811–2824. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1388245704003025. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.06.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Beek, F. B., J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2015. “Population-Based Prediction of Fitting Levels for Individual Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Audiology and Neurotology 20 (1): 1–16. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/362779. doi:10.1159/000362779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Beek, F. B., J. J. Briaire, K. S. van der Marel, B. M. Verbist, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2016. “Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning Versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn.” Audiology and Neurotology 21 (1): 54–67. https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/442513. doi:10.1159/000442513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Bas, Andrew M. Botros, Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Klaus Begall, Norbert Dillier, Matthias Hey, Wai Kong Lai, et al. 2007. “Clinical Results of AutoNRT a Completely Automatic ECAP Recording System for Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing 28 (4): 558–570. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1d1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, J. L., M. Sainz, C. Roldan, I. Alvarez, and A. de la Torre. 2012. “Long-Term Evolution of the Electrical Stimulation Levels for Cochlear Implant Patients.” Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology 5 (4): 194–200. doi:10.3342/ceo.2012.5.4.194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroegop, J. L., J. G. Dingemanse, M. P. van der Schroeff, R. M. Metselaar, and A. Goedegebure. 2017. “Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning.” Ear and Hearing 38 (4): e232–e240. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-201707000-00015. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztestes in deutscher Sprache III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Walravens, Els, Deborah Mawman, and Martin O’Driscoll. 2006. “Changes in Psychophysical Parameters During the First Month of Programming the Nucleus Contour and Contour Advance Cochlear Implants.” Cochlear Implants International 7 (1): 15–32. doi:10.1179/cim.2006.7.1.15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willeboer, C., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 2006. “Comparing Cochlear Implant Users??? Speech Performance with Processor Fittings Based on Conventionally Determined T and C Levels or on Compound Action Potential Thresholds and Live-Voice Speech in a Prospective Balanced Crossover Study.” Ear Hear 27 (6): 789–798. http://journals.lww.com/00003446-200612000-00016. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000240811.67906.55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinfollino, M., C. Cariddi, A. Ardito, M. Casulli, and P. Malerba. 2020. “Long-Term Evolution of the Electrical Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Adult Patients. The Role of a Progressive Adaptation Method.” Acta Otolaryngol 140 (2): 122–127. doi:10.1080/00016489.2019.1700303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar