370
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Spatial speech-in-noise performance in simulated single-sided deaf and bimodal cochlear implant users in comparison with real patients

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 30-43 | Received 27 May 2021, Accepted 03 Dec 2021, Published online: 28 Dec 2021

References

  • Angermeier, J., W. Hemmert, and S. Zirn. 2021. “Sound Localization Bias and Error in Bimodal Listeners Improve Instantaneously When the Device Delay Mismatch is Reduced.” Trends in Hearing 25: 23312165211016165. doi:10.1177/23312165211016165.
  • Arndt, S., A. Aschendorff, R. Laszig, R. Beck, C. Schild, S. Kroeger, G. Ihorst, and T. Wesarg. 2011. “Comparison of Pseudobinaural Hearing to Real Binaural Hearing Rehabilitation after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Unilateral Deafness and Tinnitus.” Otology & Neurotology 32 (1): 39–47. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271.
  • Başkent, D., and R. V. Shannon. 2004. “Frequency-Place Compression and Expansion in Cochlear Implant Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (5): 3130–3140. doi:10.1121/1.1804627.
  • Bennett, R. M. C., and V. Hohmann. 2012. “Simulation of Reduced Frequency Selectivity Found with Cochlear Hearing Loss Using a Model-Based Procedure.” Paper presented at the 15th annual meeting of the German Society of Audiology, Erlangen. March 7–10.
  • Beutelmann, R., and T. Brand. 2006. “Prediction of Speech Intelligibility in Spatial Noise and Reverberation for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (1): 331–342. doi:10.1121/1.2202888.
  • Beutelmann, R., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Prediction of Binaural Speech Intelligibility with Frequency-Dependent Interaural Phase Differences.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (3): 1359–1368. doi:10.1121/1.3177266.
  • Bingabr, M., B. Espinoza-Varas, and P. Loizou. 2008. “Simulating the Effect of Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implants.” Hearing Research 241 (1–2): 73–79. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.04.012.
  • Brand, T., and V. Hohmann. 2002. “An Adaptive Procedure for Categorical Loudness Scaling.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (4): 1597–1604. doi:10.1121/1.1502902.
  • Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
  • Brown, C. A., and S. P. Bacon. 2009. “Low-Frequency Speech Cues and Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (3): 1658–1665. doi:10.1121/1.3068441.
  • Chang, J. E., J. Y. Bai, and F. G. Zeng. 2006. “Unintelligible Low-Frequency Sound Enhances Simulated Cochlear-Implant Speech Recognition in Noise.” IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering 53 (12): 2598–2601. doi:10.1109/TBME.2006.883793.
  • Ching, T. Y., E. van Wanrooy, and H. Dillon. 2007. “Binaural-Bimodal Fitting or Bilateral Implantation for Managing Severe to Profound Deafness: A Review.” Trends in Amplification 11 (3): 161–192. doi:10.1177/1084713807304357.
  • Crew, J. D., J. J. Galvin, D. M. Landsberger, and Q. J. Fu. 2015. “Contributions of Electric and Acoustic Hearing to Bimodal Speech and Music Perception.” PLoS One 10 (3): e0120279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120279.
  • De Boer, M., T. Jürgens, F. T. Cornelissen, and D. Başkent. 2021. “Degraded Visual and Auditory Input Individually Impair Audiovisual Emotion Recognition from Speech-like Stimuli, but No Evidence for an Exacerbated Effect from Combined Degradation.” Vision Res 180: 51–62. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2020.12.002.
  • Desloge, J. G., C. M. Reed, L. D. Braida, Z. D. Perez, and L. A. Delhorne. 2010. “Speech Reception by Listeners with Real and Simulated Hearing Impairment: effects of Continuous and Interrupted Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 128 (1): 342–359. doi:10.1121/1.3436522.
  • Dieudonné, B., and T. Francart. 2020. “Speech Understanding with Bimodal Stimulation is Determined by Monaural Signal to Noise Ratios: No Binaural Cue Processing Involved.” Ear and Hearing 41 (5): 1158–1171. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000834.
  • Dorman, M. F., S. C. Natale, L. Baxter, D. M. Zeitler, M. L. Carlson, A. Lorens, H. Skarzynski, J. P. M. Peters, J. H. Torres, and J. H. Noble. 2020. “Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 24: 2331216520920079. doi:10.1177/2331216520920079.
  • Dorman, M. F., and R. H. Gifford. 2010. “Combining Acoustic and Electric Stimulation in the Service of Speech Recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 49: 912–919. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.509113.
  • Dorman, M. F., S. C. Natale, A. M. Butts, D. M. Zeitler, and M. L. Carlson. 2017. “The Sound Quality of Cochlear Implants: Studies with Single-Sided Deaf Patients.” Otology & Neurotology 38 (8): e268–e273. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001449.
  • Dunn, O. J. 1961. “Multiple Comparisons among Means.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 56 (293): 52–64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090.
  • Eichenauer, A., M. Dietz, B. T. Meyer, and T. Jürgens. 2016. “Introducing Temporal Rate Coding for Speech in Cochlear Implants: A Microscopic Evaluation in Humans and Models.” Paper presented at the Interspeech Conference, San Francisco, CA, September 8–12.
  • Ghitza, O. 2001. “On the Upper Cutoff Frequency of the Auditory Critical-Band Envelope Detectors in the Context of Speech Perception.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110 (3): 1628–1640. doi:10.1121/1.1396325.
  • Gifford, R. H., M. F. Dorman, S. W. Sheffield, K. Teece, and A. P. Olund. 2014. “Availability of Binaural Cues for Bilateral Implant Recipients and Bimodal Listeners with and without Preserved Hearing in the Implanted Ear.” Audiology and Neurotology 19 (1): 57–71. doi:10.1159/000355700.
  • Glasberg, B. R., and B. C. Moore. 1986. “Auditory Filter Shapes in Subjects with Unilateral and Bilateral Cochlear Impairments.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: 1020–1033. doi:10.1121/1.393374.
  • Grange, J., J. F. Culling, N. Harris, and S. Bergfeld. 2017. “Cochlear Implant Simulator with Independent Representation of the Full Spiral Ganglion.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79: EL484–EL489. doi:10.1121/1.5009602.
  • Grimault, N., T. Irino, S. Dimachki, A. Corneyllie, R. D. Patterson, and S. Garcia. 2018. “A Real Time Hearing Loss Simulator.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 104 (5): 904–908. doi:10.3813/AAA.919252.
  • Grimm, G., T. Herzke, D. Berg, and V. Hohmann. 2006. “The Master Hearing Aid: A PC-Based Platform for Algorithm Development and Evaluation.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 92: 618–628.
  • Grossmann, W., S. Brill, A. Moeltner, R. Mlynski, R. Hagen, and A. Radeloff. 2016. “Cochlear Implantation Improves Spatial Release from Masking and Restores Localization Abilities in Single-Sided Deaf Patients.” Otology & Neurotology 37 (6): 658–664. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001043.
  • Haumann, S., V. Hohmann, M. Meis, T. Herzke, T. Lenarz, and A. Büchner. 2012. “Indication Criteria for Cochlear Implants and Hearing Aids: Impact of Audiological and Non-Audiological Findings.” Audiology Research 2 (1): 64–64. doi:10.4081/audiores.2012.e12.
  • Henry, K. S., and M. G. Heinz. 2013. “Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Temporal Coding of Narrowband and Broadband Signals in the Auditory Periphery.” Hearing Research 303: 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.014.
  • Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 895–902. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
  • Hilkhuysen, G., and O. Macherey. 2014. “Optimizing Pulse-Spreading Harmonic Complexes to Minimize Intrinsic Modulations after Auditory Filtering.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 13: 1281–1294. doi:10.1121/1.4890642..
  • Hohmann, V. 2002. “Frequency Analysis and Synthesis Using a Gammatone Filterbank.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 88: 433–442.
  • Hoppe, U., T. Hocke, and F. Digeser. 2018. “Bimodal Benefit for Cochlear Implant Listeners with Different Grades of Hearing Loss in the opposite Ear.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 138 (8): 713–721. doi:10.1080/00016489.2018.1444281.
  • Hu, H., M. Dietz, B. Williges, and S. D. Ewert. 2018. “Better-Ear Glimpsing with Symmetrically-Placed Interferers in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143 (4): 2128–2141. doi:10.1121/1.5030918.
  • Hu, H., J. Sang, M. E. Lutman, and S. Bleeck. 2011. “Simulation of Hearing Loss Using Compressive Gammachirp Auditory Filters.” Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Prague, May 22–27.
  • Javel, E. 1990. “Acoustic and Electrical Encoding of Temporal Information.” In: Cochlear Implants: Model of the Electrically Stimulated Ear, edited by J. Miller and F. Spelman. New York: Springer Publishers.
  • Kayser, H., S. D. Ewert, J. Anemuller, T. Rohdenburg, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Database of Multichannel in-Ear and behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2009: 1–10. doi:10.1155/2009/298605.
  • Kong, Y. Y., and R. P. Carlyon. 2007. “Improved Speech Recognition in Noise in Simulated Binaurally Combined Acoustic and Electric Stimulation.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (6): 3717–3727. doi:10.1121/1.2717408.
  • Kong, Y. Y., G. S. Stickney, and F.-G. Zeng. 2005. “Speech and Melody Recognition in Binaurally Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (3): 1351–1361. doi:10.1121/1.1857526.
  • Kujawa, S. G., and M. C. Liberman. 2009. “Adding Insult to Injury: Cochlear Nerve Degeneration after “Temporary” Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.” The Journal of Neuroscience 29 (45): 14077–14085. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009.
  • Landsberger, D. M., M. Svrakic, J. T. Roland, Jr., and M. Svirsky. 2015. “The Relationship between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing 36: e207–e213. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000163..
  • Lazard, D. S., C. Vincent, F. Venail, P. Van de Heyning, E. Truy, O. Sterkers, P. H. Skarzynski, et al. 2012. “Pre-, per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time.” PLoS One 7 (11): e48739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048739.
  • Li, N., and P. C. Loizou. 2008. “A Glimpsing account for the Benefit of Simulated Combined Acoustic and Electric Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (4): 2287–2294. doi:10.1121/1.2839013.
  • Litovsky, R. 2012. “Spatial Release from Masking.” Acoustics Today 8 (2): 18–25. doi:10.1121/1.4729575.
  • Lopez-Poveda, E. A. 2014. “Why Do I Hear but Not Understand? Stochastic Undersampling as a Model of Degraded Neural Encoding of Speech.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8 (348): 1–7. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00348.
  • McGettigan, C., and S. Scott. 2012. “Cortical Asymmetries in Speech Perception: what’s Wrong, What’s Right and What’s Left?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (5): 269–276. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.006.
  • Moore, B. C., J. I. Alcantara, M. A. Stone, and B. R. Glasberg. 1999. “Use of a Loudness Model for Hearing Aid Fitting: II. Hearing Aids with Multi-Channel Compression.” British Journal of Audiology 33 (3): 157–170. doi:10.3109/03005369909090095.
  • Nejime, Y., and B. C. J. Moore. 1997. “Simulation of the Effect of Threshold Elevation and Loudness Recruitment Combined with Reduced Frequency Selectivity on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1): 603–615. doi:10.1121/1.419733.
  • Nobbe, A., P. Schleich, P. Nopp, and C. Zierhofer. 2006. “Vergleich einer Feinstruktur-Strategie mit der CIS+-Strategie bzgl. Tonhöhenunterscheidung bei MED-EL Benutzern.” Paper presented at the 9th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Audiology (DGA), March 8–11.
  • Nogueira, W., A. Buchner, T. Lenarz, and B. Edler. 2005. “A Psychoacoustic “NofM”-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants.” EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005: 3044–3059. doi:10.1155/ASP.2005.3044.
  • Oetting, D., V. Hohmann, J. E. Appell, B. Kollmeier, and S. D. Ewert. 2016. “Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Hearing Research 335: 179–192. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.010.
  • Oxenham, A., and H. Kreft. 2014. “Speech Perception in Tones and Noise via Cochlear Implants Reveals Influence of Spectral Resolution on Temporal Processing.” Trends in Hearing 18: 233121651455378. doi:10.1177/2331216514553783.
  • Qin, M. K., and A. J. Oxenham. 2006. “Effects of Introducing Unprocessed Low-Frequency Information on the Reception of Envelope-Vocoder Processed Speech.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (4): 2417–2426. doi:10.1121/1.2178719.
  • Reiss, L., R. A. Ito, J. L. Eggleston, and D. R. Wozny. 2014. “Abnormal Binaural Spectral Integration in Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 15 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1007/s10162-013-0434-8.
  • Schafer, E. C., A. M. Amlani, A. Seibold, and P. L. Shattuck. 2007. “A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Binaural Benefits between Bilateral Cochlear Implants and Bimodal Stimulation.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (9): 760–776. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.9.5.
  • Schoof, T., T. Green, A. Faulkner, and S. Rosen. 2013. “Advantages from Bilateral Hearing in Speech Perception in Noise with Simulated Cochlear Implants and Residual Acoustic Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (2): 1017–1030. doi:10.1121/1.4773274.
  • Siebe, T., B. Williges, D. Oetting, V. Hohmann, and T. Jürgens. 2017. “Evaluation einer modularen Auralisation von sensorineuraler Schwerhörigkeit.” [Evaluation of a Modular Auralization of Sensorineural Hearing Loss]. Paper presented at the 20th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Audiology, Aalen, February 22–25.
  • Stakhovskaya, O., D. Sridhar, B. H. Bonham, and P. A. Leake. 2007. “Frequency Map for the Human Cochlear Spiral Ganglion: Implications for Cochlear Implants.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 8 (2): 220–233. doi:10.1007/s10162-007-0076-9.
  • Stone, M. A., and B. C. J. Moore. 2003. “Tolerable Hearing Aid Delays. III. Effects on Speech Production and Perception of Across-Frequency Variation in Delay.” Ear and Hearing 24 (2): 175–183. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000058106.68049.9C.
  • van Hoesel, R. J. 2012. “Contrasting Benefits from Contralateral Implants and Hearing Aids in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 288 (1–2): 100–113. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2011.11.014.
  • van Zon, A., J. P. Peters, I. Stegeman, A. L. Smit, and W. Grolman. 2015. “Cochlear Implantation for Patients with Single-Sided Deafness or Asymmetrical Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.” Otology & Neurotology 36 (2): 209–219. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000681.
  • Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache I-III [Development and Evaluation of a Sentence Test for the German Language].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie/Audiological Acoustics 38: 4–95.
  • Warzybok, A., J. Rennies, T. Brand, S. Doclo, and B. Kollmeier. 2013. “Effects of Spatial and Temporal Integration of a Single Early Reflection on Speech Intelligibility.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (1): 269–282. doi:10.1121/1.4768880.
  • Wess, J. M., D. S. Brungart, and J. G. Bernstein. 2017. “The Effect of Interaural Mismatches on Contralateral Unmasking with Single-Sided Vocoders.” Ear and Hearing 38 (3): 374–386. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000374.
  • Whitmal, N. A., S. F. Poissant, R. L. Freyman, and K. S. Helfer. 2007. “Speech Intelligibility in Cochlear Implant Simulations: Effects of Carrier Type, Interfering Noise, and Subject Experience.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (4): 2376–2388. doi:10.1121/1.2773993.
  • Williges, B., M. Dietz, V. Hohmann, and T. Jürgens. 2015. “Spatial Release from Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users with and without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.” Trends in Hearing 19: 233121651561694. doi:10.1177/2331216515616940.
  • Williges, B., T. Jürgens, H. Hu, and M. Dietz. 2018. “Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise with Bilateral Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518781746. doi:10.1177/2F2331216518781746.
  • Williges, B., T. Wesarg, L. Jung, L. Geven, A. Radeloff, and T. Jürgens. 2019. “Spatial Speech-in-Noise Performance in Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users I: Assessment.” Trends in Hearing 23: 233121651985831. doi:10.1177/2331216519858311.
  • Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, D. T. Lawson, R. D. Wolford, D. K. Eddington, and W. M. Rabinowitz. 1991. “Better Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants.” Nature 352 (6332): 236–238. doi:10.1038/352236a0.
  • Yoon, Y. S., Y. R. Shin, J. S. Gho, and Q. J. Fu. 2015. “Bimodal Benefit Depends on the Performance Difference between a Cochlear Implant and a Hearing Aid.” Cochlear Implants International 16 (3): 159–167. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000101.
  • Zedan, A., B. Williges, and T. Jürgens. 2018. “Modeling Speech Intelligibility of Simulated Bimodal and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 104 (5): 918–921. doi:10.3813/AAA.919256.
  • Zeng, F. G. 2002. “Temporal Pitch in Electric Hearing.” Hearing Research 174 (1–2): 101–106. doi:10.1016/S0378-5955(02)00644-5.
  • Zeng, F. G., S. Rebscher, W. Harrison, X. Sun, and H. Feng. 2008. “Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation.” IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1: 115–142. doi:10.1109/RBME.2008.2008250..
  • Zirn, S., S. Arndt, A. Aschendorff, and T. Wesarg. 2015. “Interaural Stimulation Timing in Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 328: 148–156. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.010.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.