Evaluation of a semi-supervised self-adjustment fine-tuning procedure for hearing aids

References

• Abrams, H., B. Edwards, S. Valentine, and K. Fitz. 2011. “A Patient-Adjusted Fine-Tuning Approach for Optimizing the Hearing Aid Response.” Hearing Review 18 (3): 18–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, D. L. 1997. “Programmable Instruments and Successive Approximations.” The Hearing Review 4 (1): 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bisgaard, N., M. S. M. G. Vlaming, and M. Dahlquist. 2010. “Standard Audiograms for the IEC 60118-15 Measurement Procedure.” Trends in Amplification 14 (2): 113–120. doi:10.1177/1084713810379609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd, A., and C. Mackersie. 2017. “A "Goldilocks" Approach to Hearing-Aid Self-Fitting: User Interactions.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (3S): 430–435. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0125.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boymans, M., and W. A. Dreschler. 2012. “Audiologist-Driven versus Patient-Driven Fine Tuning of Hearing Instruments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (1): 49–58. doi:10.1177/1084713811424884.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bradley, R. A., and M. E. Terry. 1952. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs: I. The Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika 39 (3/4): 324–345. doi:10.2307/2334029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. 1986. “Effects of Bandwidth and Stimulus Type on Most Comfortable Loudness Levels of Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80 (2): 484–493. doi:10.1121/1.394044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., and S. Cotton. 1988. “Evaluation of the National Acoustic Laboratories' new hearing aid selection procedure.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 31 (2): 178–186. doi:10.1044/jshr.3102.178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Byrne, D., and H. Dillon. 1986. “The National Acoustic Laboratories’ (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid.” Ear and Hearing 7 (4): 257–265. doi:10.1097/00003446-198608000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., A. Parkinson, and P. Newall. 1990. “Hearing Aid Gain and Frequency Response Requirements for the Severely/Profoundly Hearing Impaired.” Ear and Hearing 11 (1): 40–49. doi:10.1097/00003446-199002000-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalupper, J., D. Junius, and T. Powers. 2009. “Algorithm Lets Users Train Aid to Optimize Compression, Frequency Shape, and Gain.” The Hearing Journal 62 (8): 26–28. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000359131.58356.8f.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, R. H. B. 2019. ordinal - Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019.12-10. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ordinal
   Google Scholar
• Convery, E., G. Keidser, H. Dillon, and L. Hartley. 2011. “A Self-Fitting Hearing Aid: Need and Concept.” Trends in Amplification 15 (4): 157–166. doi:10.1177/1084713811427707.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Convery, E., G. Keidser, and L. Hartley. 2011. “Perception of a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid among Urban-Dwelling Hearing-Impaired Adults in a Developed Country.” Trends in Amplification 15 (4): 175–183. doi:10.1177/1084713811424886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon, H. 1999. “NAL-NL1: A New Procedure for Fitting Non-Linear Hearing Aids.” The Hearing Journal 52 (4): 10–16. doi:10.1097/00025572-199904000-00002.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., J. A. Zakis, H. McDermott, G. Keidser, W. Dreschler, and E. Convery. 2006. “The Trainable Hearing Aid: What Will It Do for Clients and Clinicians?” The Hearing Journal 59 (4): 30. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286694.20964.4a.
   Google Scholar
• Dreschler, W. A., G. Keidser, E. Convery, and H. Dillon. 2008. “Client-Based Adjustments of Hearing Aid Gain: The Effect of Different Control Configurations.” Ear and Hearing 29 (2): 214–227. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816453a6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, S. D. 2013. AFC-A modular framework for running psychoacoustic experiments and computational perception models. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics AIA-DAGA. p. 1326–1329. German Acoustical Society (DEGA).
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, M. E., M. R. Gillespie, and J. E. Creston. 1965. “Clinical Evaluation of a "Master Hearing Aid.” Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 82 (5): 515–517. doi:10.1001/archotol.1965.00760010517012.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y., and H. G. Mueller. 2008. “User Preference and Reliability of Bilateral Hearing Aid Gain Adjustments.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 19 (2): 158–170. doi:10.3766/jaaa.19.2.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, Niels Søgaard, Ole Hau, Jens Brehm Bagger Nielsen, Thor Bundgaard Nielsen, and Søren Vase Legarth. 2019. “Perceptual Effects of Adjusting hearing-aid Gain by Means of a Machine-Learning Approach Based on Individual User Preference.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519847413. doi:10.1177/2331216519847413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad, L. M., D. J. van Tasell, and C. Ewert. 2003. “Hearing Aid Troubleshooting Based on Patients’ Descriptions.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (7): 347–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kayser, H., S. D. Ewert, J. Anemüller, T. Rohdenburg, V. Hohmann, and B. Kollmeier. 2009. “Database of Multichannel in-Ear and behind-the-Ear Head-Related and Binaural Room Impulse Responses.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2009 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1155/2009/298605.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G. 1995. “The Relationship between Listening Conditions and Alternative Amplification Schemes for Multiple Memory Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 16 (6): 575–586. doi:10.1097/00003446-199512000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., and K. Alamudi. 2013. “Real-Life Efficacy and Reliability of Training a Hearing Aid.” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 619–629. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828d269a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., C. Brew, S. Brewer, H. Dillon, F. Grant, and L. Storey. 2005. “The Preferred Response Slopes and Two-Channel Compression Ratios in Twenty Listening Conditions by Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners and Their Relationship to the Acoustic Input.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (11): 656–670. doi:10.1080/14992020500266803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., and E. Convery. 2018. “Outcomes with a Self-Fitting Hearing Aid.” Trends in Hearing 22: 233121651876895. 2331216518768958. doi:10.1177/2331216518768958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., E. Convery, and H. Dillon. 2007. “Potential Users and Perception of a Self-Adjustable and Trainable Hearing Aid: A Consumer Survey.” Hearing Review 14 (4): 18. http://www.hearingreview.com/2007/04/potential-users-and-perception-of-a-self-adjustable-and-trainable-hearing-aid-a-consumer-survey/.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, and D. Byrne. 1995. “Candidates for Multiple Frequency Response Characteristics.” Ear and Hearing 16 (6): 562–574. doi:10.1097/00003446-199512000-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, L. Carter, and A. O'Brien. 2012. “NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (4): 211–223. doi:10.1177/1084713812468511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, and S. Brewer. 2011. “The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.” Audiology Research 1 (1): e24. e24. doi:10.4081/audiores.2011.e24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kendall, M. G. 1948. Rank Correlation Methods. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, M. G., and B. B. Smith. 1940. “On the Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika 31 (3-4): 324–345. doi:10.2307/2332613.
   Google Scholar
• Kinkel, M. 2009. Ein neuartiges Verfahren zur "interaktiven" Hörgeräte-Anpassung. In 12th Congress of the German Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., and J. Kiessling. 2018. “Functionality of Hearing Aids: State-of-the-Art and Future Model-Based Solutions.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup3): S3–S28. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1256504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, M., M. Schulte, T. Brand, and I. Holube. 2017. “Development of an Adaptive Scaling Method for Subjective Listening Effort.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (6): 4680–4693. doi:10.1121/1.4986938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk, F. K. 1998. “Using the I/O Curve to Help Solve Subjective Complaints with WDRC Hearing Instruments.” Hearing Review 5 (1): 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, F. K. 1999. “How Flow Charts Can Help You Troubleshoot Hearing Aid Problems.” The Hearing Journal 52 (10): 46–52. doi:10.1097/00025572-199910000-00005
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, F. K., and N. M. C. Pape. 1992. “The Reliability of a Modified Simplex Procedure in Hearing Aid Frequency-Response Selection.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 35 (2): 418–429. doi:10.1044/jshr.3502.418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, R., R. Guo, J. Xi, Y. Xie, and L. Zhao. 2017. “Self-Fitting Algorithm for Digital Hearing Aid Based on Interactive Evolutionary Computation and Expert System.” Applied Sciences 7 (3): 272. doi:10.3390/app7030272.
   Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D., M. Ben-Shachar, I. Patil, P. Waggoner, and D. Makowski. 2021. “Performance: An R Package for Assessment, Comparison and Testing of Statistical Models.” Journal of Open Source Software 6 (60): 3139. doi:10.21105/joss.03139.
   Google Scholar
• Lunner, T., M. Rudner, and J. Rönnberg. 2009. “Cognition and Hearing Aids.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 395–403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00742.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C., A. Boothroyd, and A. Lithgow. 2019. “A Goldilocks Approach to Hearing Aid Self-Fitting: Ear-Canal Output and Speech Intelligibility Index.” Ear and Hearing 40 (1): 107–115. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makowski, D., M. Ben-Shachar, I. Patil, and D. Lüdecke. 2020. Estimation of Model-Based Predictions, Contrasts and Means. https://github.com/easystats/modelbased
   Google Scholar
• Neher, T., and K. C. Wagener. 2019. “Investigating Differences in Preferred Noise Reduction Strength among Hearing Aid Users.” Trends in Hearing 20:2331216516655794. doi:10.1177/2331216516655794.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. B., T. T. Perry, M. Gregan, and D. VanTasell. 2018. “Self-Adjusted Amplification Parameters Produce Large between-Subject Variability and Preserve Speech Intelligibility.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518798264. doi:10.1177/2331216518798264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, T. T., P. B. Nelson, and D. J. van Tasell. 2019. “Listener Factors Explain Little Variability in Self-Adjusted Hearing Aid Gain.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519837124–2331216519837117. doi:10.1177/2331216519837124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K. 2009. “Cognitive Aging and Auditory Information Processing.” International Journal of Audiology 42: 26–32. doi:10.3109/14992020309074641.
   Google Scholar
• Punch, J. L., and E. L. Beck. 1980. “Low-Frequency Response of Hearing Aids and Judgments of Aided Speech Quality.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 45 (3): 325–335. doi:10.1044/jshd.4503.325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Punch, J. L., and C. A. Parker. 1981. “Pairwise Listener Preferences in Hearing Aid Evaluation.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 24 (3): 366–374. doi:10.1044/jshr.2403.366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhart, P. N., P. E. Souza, N. K. Srinivasan, and F. J. Gallun. 2016. “Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment.” Ear and Hearing 37 (2): 144–152. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennies, J., D. Oetting, H. Baumgartner, and J.-E. Appell. 2016. User-Interface Concepts for Sound Personalization in Headphones. In Audio Engineering Society Conference: 2016 AES International Conference on Headphone Technology. http://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=18370.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., C. Foo, J. Rönnberg, and T. Lunner. 2009. “Cognition and Aided Speech Recognition in Noise: Specific Role for Cognitive Factors following Nine-Week Experience with Adjusted Compression Settings in Hearing Aids.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 405–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00745.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, C., M. Mortz, and N. Vaughan. 1999. “Perhaps Not by Prescription, but by Perception.” High Performance Hearing Solutions 3: 58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, C., and D. A. Smith. 2003. “Reducing the Negative Effects of Reverberation in Hearing Aid Processing.” The Hearing Review 10(12): 24–31. https://www.hearingreview.com/hearing-products/accessories/components/reducing-the-negative-effects-of-reverberation-in-hearing-aid-processing.
   Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.,. R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford. 2005. “The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4): 159–197. doi:10.1177/108471380500900403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smeds, K., G. Keidser, J. Zakis, H. Dillon, A. Leijon, F. Grant, E. Convery, and C. Brew. 2006a. “Preferred Overall Loudness. I: Sound Field Presentation in the Laboratory.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (1): 2–11. doi:10.1080/14992020500190144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., G. Keidser, J. Zakis, H. Dillon, A. Leijon, F. Grant, E. Convery, and C. Brew. 2006b. “Preferred Overall Loudness. II: Listening through Hearing Aids in Field and Laboratory Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (1): 12–25. doi:10.1080/14992020500190177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., and F. Lassman. 1970. “Listener Preference for Selective vs Flat Amplification for a High-Frequency Hearing-Loss Population.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 13 (3): 670–672. doi:10.1044/jshr.1303.670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentine, S., J. A. Dundas, and K. Fitz. 2011. “Evidence for the Use of a New Patient-Centered Fitting Tool.” Hearing Review 18 (4): 28–34. http://www.hearingreview.com/2011/04/evidence-for-the-use-of-a-new-patient-centered-fitting-tool/.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, S., and A. Dundas. 2011. A Patient-Assisted Fitting: Introducing SoundPoint. Audioglogyonline. https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/patient-assisted-fitting-introducing-soundpoint-822
   Google Scholar
• Völker, C., S. M. A. Ernst, and B. Kollmeier. 2018. “Hearing Aid Fitting and Fine-Tuning Based on Estimated Individual Traits.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (sup3): S139–S145. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1257163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Test.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38 (2): 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38 (3): 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test Part I: Design of the Oldenburg Sentence Test.” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38 (1): 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wickelmaier, F., and C. Schmid. 2004. “A Matlab Function to Estimate Choice Model Parameters from Paired-Comparison Data.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers: a Journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc 36 (1): 29–40. doi:10.3758/BF03195547.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakis, J. A., H. Dillon, and H. J. McDermott. 2007. “The Design and Evaluation of a Hearing Aid with Trainable Amplification Parameters.” Ear and Hearing 28 (6): 812–830. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181576738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar