Speech discrimination and word identification with a consumer-level bone-conduction headset and remote microphone for children with normal hearing

References

• American Academy of Audiology. 2008. “American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technologies for Children and Youth from Birth to 21 Years.” https://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/HAT_Guidelines_Supplement_A.pdf_53996ef7758497.54419000.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bizley, J. K., N. Elliott, K. C. Wood, and D. A. Vickers. 2015. “Simultaneous Assessment of Speech Identification and Spatial Discrimination: A Potential Testing Approach for Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users?” Trends in Hearing 19: 233121651561957. 2331216515619573. doi:10.1177/2331216515619573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boynton, P. M., and T. Greenhalgh. 2004. “Selecting, Designing, and Developing Your Questionnaire.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 328 (7451): 1312–1315. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/328/7451/1312.abstract. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7451.1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., and M. Stevens. 2018. “Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.” Journal of Cognition 1 (1): 9. doi:10.5334/joc.10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department for Education. 2014. “Area Guidelines for Mainstream Schools.” Building Bulletin 103. Accessed October 21, 2020. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/905692/BB103_Area_Guidelines_for_Mainstream_Schools.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erldfelder, A.-G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 175–191. doi:10.3758/bf03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederichs, E., and P. Friederichs. 2005. “Electrophysiologic and Psycho-Acoustic Findings following One-Year Application of a Personal Ear-Level FM Device in Children with Attention Deficit and Suspected Central Auditory Processing Disorder.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 12: 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, A. J., K. J. Munro, and J. Heron. 2007. “Developmental Changes in Word Recognition Threshold from Two to Five Years of Age in Children with Different Middle Ear Status.” International Journal of Audiology 46 (7): 355–361. doi:10.1080/14992020701331570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, C. B., and A. M. Tharpe. 2002. “Listening Effort and Fatigue in School-Age Children with and without Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45 (3): 573–584. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2002/046).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland Brown, T. M., M. Salorio-Corbetto, R. Gray, A. James Best, and J. E. Marriage. 2019. “Using a Bone-Conduction Headset to Improve Speech Discrimination in Children with Otitis Media with Effusion.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519858303–2331216519858309. doi:10.1177/2331216519858303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland Brown, T. M., I. Fitzgerald O’Connor, J. Bewick, and C. Morley. 2021. “Bone Conduction Hearing Kit for Children with Glue Ear.” BMJ Innovations 7 (4): 600–603. doi:10.1136/bmjinnov-2021-000676.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D.G., G. Kranj, K. Yu, and W. E. Hodgetts. 2004. “Speech Intelligibility of Young School-Aged Children in the Presence of Real-Life Classroom Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 15 (7): 508–517. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15.7.5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jerger, J. 1970. “Clinical Experience with Impedance Audiometry.” Archives of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery 92 (4): 311–324. doi:10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, K. N., A. B. John, N. V. Kreisman, J. W. Hall III, and C. C. Crandell. 2009. “Multiple Benefits of Personal FM System Use by Children with Auditory Processing Disorder (APD).” International Journal of Audiology 48 (6): 371–383. doi:10.1080/14992020802687516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, W. J., and S. C. Purdy. 2014. “Assistive and Therapeutic Effects of Amplification for Auditory Processing Disorder.” Seminars in Hearing 35 (01): 027–038. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1363522.
   Google Scholar
• Letowski, T., T. Mermagen, and N. Vause. 2004. “Bone Conduction Communication in Noise: A Preliminary Study.” Proceedings of the XXI International Congress on Sound and Vibrations, 3037–3044.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. E., D. L. Valente, and J. L. Spalding. 2015. “Effect of Minimal/Mild Hearing Loss on Children’s Speech Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.” Ear & Hearing 36 (1): 136–144. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, R., Q. Summerfield, and D. Vickers. 2013. “Test-Retest Reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a Masker of Noise or Babble in Children with Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (6): 377–384. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.769064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C., T. Mermagen, and A. Scharine. 2017. “The Effect of Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Tinnitus on Speech Recognition over Air and Bone Conduction Military Communications Headsets.” Hearing Research 349: 67–75. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, B. 1977. “The Toy Discrimination Test: An Aid for Screening the Hearing of Children above a Mental Age of Two Years.” Public Health 91 (2): 67–74. doi:10.1016/s0033-3506(77)80003-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. R., N. G. Campbell, S. Rosen, et al. 2018. Position Statement and Practice Guidance: Auditory Processing Disorder (APD). British Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, G. 2016. “Theoretical Issues of Validity in the Measurement of Aided Speech Reception Threshold in Noise for Comparing Nonlinear Hearing Aid Systems.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (7): 504–514. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, P. B., and S. Soli. 2000. “Acoustical Barriers to Learning: Children at Risk in Every Classroom.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 31 (4): 356–361. doi:10.1044/0161-1461.3104.356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noh, H., and Y.-G. Park. 2012. “How Close Should a Student with Unilateral Hearing Loss Stay to a Teacher in a Noisy Classroom?” International Journal of Audiology 51 (6): 426–432. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.654855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ousey, J., S. Sheppard, T. Twomey, and A. R. Palmer. 1989. “The IHR-Mccormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test—description and Initial Evaluation.” British Journal of Audiology 23 (3): 245–249. doi:10.3109/03005368909076506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picou, E. M., L. M. Charles, and T. A. Ricketts. 2017. “Child-Adult Differences in Using Dual-Task Paradigms to Measure Listening Effort.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (2): 143–154. doi:10.1044/2016_AJA-16-0059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rance, G., D. Chisari, K. Saunders, and J.-L. Rault. 2017. “Reducing Listening-Related Stress in School-Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 47 (7): 2010–2022. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3114-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts, T. A., E. M. Picou, and J. Galster. 2017. “Directional Microphone Hearing Aids in School Environments: Working toward Optimization.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 60 (1): 263–275. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salorio-Corbetto, M., B. Williges, W. Lamping, et al. 2022. “Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 16: 1–17. Article number 787153. doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.787153
   Google Scholar
• Schafer, E. C., S. Florence, C. Anderson, J. Dyson, S. Wright, K. Sanders, and D. Bryant. 2014. “A Critical Review of Remote-Microphone Technology for Children with Normal Hearing and Auditory Differences.” Journal of Educational Audiology 20: 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M., S. C. Purdy, and A. S. Kelly. 2012. “A Randomized Control Trial of Interventions in School-Aged Children with Auditory Processing Disorders.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 506–518. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summerfield, Q., A. R. Palmer, J. R. Foster, D. H. Marshall, and T. Twomey. 1994. “Clinical Evaluation and Test-Retest Reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.” British Journal of Audiology 28 (3): 165–179. doi:10.3109/03005369409086564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharpe, A. M., T. Ricketts, and D. P. Sladen. 2003. “FM Systems for Children with Minimal to Mild Hearing Loss.” Chapter 20. ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions: 191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Thibodeau, L. 2014. “Comparison of Speech Recognition with Adaptive Digital and FM Remote Microphone Hearing Assistance Technology by Listeners Who Use Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 23 (2): 201–210. doi:10.1044/2014_AJA-13-0065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, D. A., B. C. Bradford, N. C. Macdonald, N. K. Rostamzadeh, N. K. Mason, R. Pandya, and J. E. Marriage. et al. 2013. “Using Personal Response Systems to Assess Speech Perception within the Classroom: An Approach to Determine the Efficacy of Sound Field Amplification in Primary School Classrooms.” Ear and Hearing 34 (4): 491–502. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827ad76f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. Available at: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org.
   Google Scholar