Do we need audiogram-based prescriptions? A systematic review

References

• Almufarrij, I., H. Dillon, and K. J. Munro. 2021a. “Does Probe-Tube Verification of Real-Ear Hearing Aid Amplification Characteristics Improve Outcomes in Adults? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Trends in Hearing 25: 2331216521999563–2331216521999563. doi:10.1177/2331216521999563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almufarrij, I., H. Dillon, and K. J. Munro. 2021b. “Is the Outcome of Fitting Hearing Aids to Adults Affected by Whether an Audiogram-Based Prescription Formula is Individually Applied? A Systematic Review Protocol.” BMJ Open 11 (8): e045899. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almufarrij, I., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, M. A. Stone, and H. Dillon. 2019. “Direct-to-Consumer Hearing Devices: Capabilities, Costs, and Cosmetics.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519858301. doi:10.1177/2331216519858301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., L. V. Hedges, J. P. Higgins, and H. R. Rothstein. 2009. Introduction to Meta-Analysis. Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., H. Dillon, T. Ching, R. Katsch, and G. Keidser. 2001. “NAL-NL1 Procedure for Fitting Nonlinear Hearing Aids: Characteristics and Comparisons with Other Procedures.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12 (1): 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 1995. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.” Ear and Hearing 16 (2): 176–186. doi:10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and C. Gilmore. 1990. “Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP).” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 33 (2): 343–357. doi:10.1044/jshr.3302.343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., P. Smith, M. Ferguson, D. Stephens, and I. Gianopoulos. 2007. “Acceptability, Benefit and Costs of Early Screening for Hearing Disability: A Study of Potential Screening Tests and Models.” Health Technology Assessment 11 (42): 1–294. doi:10.3310/hta11420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2001. The Research of Denis Byrne at NAL: Implications for Clinicians Today. https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/research-denis-byrne-at-nal-1200 (Accessed: 25/04/2020).
   Google Scholar
• Downs, S. H., and N. Black. 1998. “The Feasibility of Creating a Checklist for the Assessment of the Methodological Quality Both of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies of Health Care Interventions.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 52 (6): 377–384. doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. A., P. T. Kitterick, L. Y. Chong, M. Edmondson-Jones, F. Barker, and D. J. Hoare. 2017. “Hearing Aids for Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss in Adults.” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 9: CD012023. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012023.pub2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. P. T, and S. Green. 2008. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, P., J. W. Jutai, G. Strong, and E. Russell-Minda. 2008. “Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Low-Vision Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.” Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology. Journal Canadien D'ophtalmologie 43 (2): 180–187. doi:10.3129/i08-001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., D. L. Kinney, A. K. Main, and S. E. Rogers. 2019. “A Follow-Up Clinical Trial Evaluating the Consumer-Decides Service Delivery Model.” American Journal of Audiology 28 (1): 69–84. doi:10.1044/2018_AJA-18-0082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., S. E. Rogers, T. M. Quigley, A. K. Main, D. L. Kinney, and C. Herring. 2017. “The Effects of Service-Delivery Model and Purchase Price on Hearing-Aid Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (1): 53–79. doi:10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I. H., and V. O. Knudsen. 1938. “What Audiometry Can Now Mean in Routine Practice.” Journal of the American Medical Association 111 (7): 597–605. doi:10.1001/jama.1938.02790330017004.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G. 1995. “The Relationship between Listening Conditions and Alternative Amplification Schemes for Multiple Memory Hearing Aids.” Ear and Hearing 16 (6): 575–586. doi:10.1097/00003446-199512000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, L. Carter, and A. O'Brien. 2012. “NAL-NL2 Empirical Adjustments.” Trends in Amplification 16 (4): 211–223. doi:10.1177/1084713812468511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, M. Flax, T. Ching, and S. Brewer. 2011. “The NAL-NL2 Prescription Procedure.” Audiology Research 1 (1): e24. doi:10.4081/audiores.2011.e24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kochkin, S. 2009. “MarkeTrak VIII: 25-Year Trends in the Hearing Health Market.” Hearing Review 16 (11): 12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kyzas, P. A., D. Denaxa-Kyza, and J. P. Ioannidis. 2007. “Almost All Articles on Cancer Prognostic Markers Report Statistically Significant Results.” European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 43 (17): 2559–2579. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lybarger, S. 1944. US patent application SN543-278.
   Google Scholar
• Maidment, D. W., A. B. Barker, J. Xia, and M. A. Ferguson. 2018. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing the Effectiveness of Alternative Listening Devices to Conventional Hearing Aids in Adults with Hearing Loss.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (10): 721–729. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1493546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthew, J. P., P. T. H. Julian, and A. C. S. Jonathan. 2019. “Assessing Risk of Bias Due to Missing Results in a Synthesis.” In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions edited by, Julian, P. T. H., James, T., Jacqueline, C., Miranda, C., Tianjing, L., Matthew, J. P. & Vivian, A. W. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: The Cochrane Collaboration and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• McArdle, R., T. H. Chisolm, H. B. Abrams, R. H. Wilson, and P. J. Doyle. 2005. “The WHO-DAS II: Measuring Outcomes of Hearing Aid Intervention for Adults.” Trends in Amplification 9 (3): 127–143. doi:10.1177/108471380500900304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metselaar, M., B. Maat, P. Krijnen, H. Verschuure, W. Dreschler, and L. Feenstra. 2008. “Comparison of Speech Intelligibility in Quiet and in Noise after Hearing Aid Fitting according to a Purely Prescriptive and a Comparative Fitting Procedure.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 265 (9): 1113–1120. doi:10.1007/s00405-008-0596-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metselaar, M., B. Maat, P. Krijnen, H. Verschuure, W. A. Dreschler, and L. Feenstra. 2009. “Self-Reported Disability and Handicap after Hearing-Aid Fitting and Benefit of Hearing Aids: comparison of Fitting Procedures, Degree of Hearing Loss, Experience with Hearing Aids and Uni- and Bilateral Fittings.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: Official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 266 (6): 907–917. doi:10.1007/s00405-008-0847-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman, PRISMA Group. 2009. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement.” PLoS Medicine 6 (7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C., B. R. Glasberg, and M. A. Stone. 2010. “Development of a New Method for Deriving Initial Fittings for Hearing Aids with Multi-Channel Compression: CAMEQ2-HF.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (3): 216–227. doi:10.3109/14992020903296746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, H. G. 2005. “Fitting Hearing Aids to Adults Using Prescriptive Methods: An Evidence-Based Review of Effectiveness.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (7): 448–460. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.7.5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller, H. G. 2015. 20Q: Today's use of validated prescriptive methods for fitting hearing aids - what would Denis say?: AudiologyOnline. https://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/20q-today-s-use-14101 (Accessed: 5/11/2021).
   Google Scholar
• Munro, K, and G. H. Mueller. 2016. “Clinical Verification of Hearing Aid Performance.” In Hearing Aids, edited by Popelka, G., Moore, B. C., Fay, R. & Popper, A. Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nance, G, and D. Causey. 1968. 'Hearing-Aid Evaluation: An Examination of Two Procedures', Bulletin of Prosthetics Research – Spring.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, W., N. S. Jensen, G. Naylor, N. Bhullar, and M. A. Akeroyd. 2013. “A Short Form of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale Suitable for Clinical Use: The SSQ12.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (6): 409–412. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.781278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, N. S., A. Oliver, N. K. Srinivasan, F. R. Lin, and P. A. Korczak. 2019. “Pilot Comparison of Adjustment Protocols of Personal Sound Amplification Products.” Seminars in Hearing 40 (1): 26–36. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1676781.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richardson, W. S., M. C. Wilson, J. Nishikawa, and R. S. Hayward. 1995. “The Well-Built Clinical Question: A Key to Evidence-Based Decisions.” ACP Journal Club 123 (3): A12–A13. doi:10.7326/ACPJC-1995-123-3-A12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sabin, A. T., D. J. Van Tasell, B. Rabinowitz, and S. Dhar. 2020. “Validation of a Self-Fitting Method for over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.” Trends in Hearing 24: 2331216519900589. doi:10.1177/2331216519900589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S., T. Y. Ching, R. Seewald, H. Dillon, L. Britton, J. Steinberg, and J. Corcoran. 2010. “Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 Prescriptions for Children: Preference in Real World Use.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (Suppl. 1): S49–S63. doi:10.3109/14992020903148038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scollie, S., R. Seewald, L. Cornelisse, S. Moodie, M. Bagatto, D. Laurnagaray, S. Beaulac, and J. Pumford. 2005. “The Desired Sensation Level Multistage Input/Output Algorithm.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4): 159–197. doi:10.1177/108471380500900403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shamseer, L., D. Moher, M. Clarke, D. Ghersi, A. Liberati, M. Petticrew, P. Shekelle, and L. A. Stewart, PRISMA-P Group. 2015. “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: Elaboration and Explanation.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 350: g7647. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thyer, N. J., J. Watson, C. Jackson, L. Hickson, C. Maynard, A. Forster, L. Clark, et al. 2018. “Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of the Active Communication Education Programme plus Hearing Aid Provision versus Hearing Aid Provision Alone (ACE to HEAR): A Study Protocol.” BMJ Open 8 (7): e021502. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, E. H., A. M. Matthews, E. Linardatos, R. A. Tell, and R. Rosenthal. 2008. “Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy.” New England Journal of Medicine 358 (3): 252–260. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa065779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanski, D., H. Hernandez, J. Oleson, and Y. H. Wu. 2021. “Toward a New Evidence-Based Fitting Paradigm for over-the-Counter Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 30 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventry, I. M., and B. E. Weinstein. 1982. “The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: A New Tool.” Ear and Hearing 3 (3): 128–134. doi:10.1097/00003446-198205000-00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walravens, E., G. Keidser, and L. Hickson. 2020. “Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.” Trends in Hearing 24: 2331216520933392. doi:10.1177/2331216520933392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, X., W. Wang, J. Liu, and T. Tong. 2014. “Estimating the Sample Mean and Standard Deviation from the Sample Size, Median, Range and/or Interquartile Range.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 14 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2018. Global Health Estimates 2016: Disease burden by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000–2016. Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. 2020. Deafness and hearing loss: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss (Accessed: 06/10/2020).
   Google Scholar