Lilliput: speech perception in speech-weighted noise and in quiet in young children

References

• Boersma, P. and D. Weenink. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. www.praat.org.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, E., L. J. Leibold, and J. W. Hall. 3rd. 2016. “Effect of Response Context and Masker Type on Word Recognition in School-age Children and Adults.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140 (2):968–977. doi:10.1121/1.4960587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, E., S. E. Hodge, L. Calandruccio, L. J. Leibold, and J. H. Grose. 2019. “Masked Sentence Recognition in Children, Young Adults, and Older Adults: Age-Dependent Effects of Semantic Context and Masker Type.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5):1117–1126. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, C. G., D. B. Pisoni, and A. T. Tierney. 2006. “Effects of Open-set and Closed-set Task Demands on Spoken Word Recognition.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 17 (5):331–349. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, N. E., A. Y. Bonino, E. Buss, and L. Leibold. 2016. “Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.” Ear and Hearing 37 (1):55–63. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubas, C., H. Porter, R. W. McCreery, E. Buss, and L. J. Leibold. 2022. “Speech-in-Speech Recognition in Preschoolers.” International Journal of Audiology 19:1–8. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35184649. doi:10.1080/14992027.2022.2035833.
   Google Scholar
• Easwar, V., J. Sanfilippo, B. Papsin, and K. Gordon. 2018. “Impact of Consistency in Daily Device Use on Speech Perception Abilities in Children with Cochlear Implants: Datalogging Evidence.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (09):835–846. PMID: 30278868. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. L., S. Connors, E. Kille, S. Levin, K. Ball, and D. Katz. 1979. “Children's Understanding of Monosyllabic Nouns in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (1):12–21. doi:10.1121/1.383065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. L. 1979. “Performance of Children Aged 9 to 17 Years on a Test of Speech Intelligibility in Noise Using Sentence Material with Controlled Word Predictability.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (3):651–653. doi:10.1121/1.383691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, L. C., and R. S. Newman. 2017. “Influences of Background Noise on Infants and Children.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 26 (5):451–457. doi:10.1177/0963721417709087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T., A. van Wieringen, and J. Wouters. 2008. “APEX 3: A Multi-Purpose Test Platform for Auditory Psychophysical Experiments.” Journal of Neuroscience Methods 172 (2):283–293. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.04.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garadat, S. N., and R. Y. Litovsky. 2007. “Speech Intelligibility in Free Field: Spatial Unmasking in Preschool Children.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (2):1047–1055. doi:10.1121/1.2409863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. W. 3rd, J. H. Grose, E. Buss, and M. B. Dev. 2002. Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shape
   Google Scholar
• Hillock-Dunn, A., C. Taylor, E. Buss, and L. J. Leibold. 2015. “Assessing Speech Perception in Children with Hearing Loss: What Conventional Clinical Tools May Miss.” Ear and Hearing 36 (2):e57–e60. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hnath-Chisolm, T. E., E. Laipply, and A. Boothroyd. 1998. “Age-Related Changes on a Children's Test of Sensory-Level Speech Perception Capacity.” J Speech Lang Hear Res 41 (1):94–106. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4101.94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM SPSS 27. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Jerger, S., and J. Jerger. 1982. “Pediatric Speech Intelligibility Test: Performance-Intensity Characteristics.” Ear and Hearing 3 (6):325–334. doi:10.1097/00003446-198211000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerger, S., J. Jerger, and S. Abrams. 1983. “Speech Audiometry in the Young Child.” Ear Hear 4 (1):56–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, P. R., D. R. Moore, and S. Amitay. 2015. “Development of Auditory Selective Attention: Why Children Struggle to Hear in Noisy Environments.” Developmental Psychology 51 (3):353–369. doi:10.1037/a0038570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, M. B., S. Kreiner, M. Soderstrom, J. Dorup, and J. Lous. 2015. “A speech Reception in Noise Test for Preschool Children (the Galker-test): Validity, Reliability and Acceptance.” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 79 (10):1694–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L. J., and E. Buss. 2013. “Children's Identification of Consonants in a Speech-Shaped Noise or a Two-Talker Masker.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56 (4):1144–1155. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L. J., A. Y. Bonino, and E. Buss. 2016. “Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.” Ear and Hearing 37 (3):345–353. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L. J., and E. Buss. 2019. “Masked Speech Recognition in School-Age Children.” Frontiers in Psychology 10:1981. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArdle, R., and R. H. Wilson. 2008. “Predicting Word-Recognition Performance in Noise by Young Listeners with Normal Hearing Using Acoustic, Phonetic, and Lexical Variables.” Journal of the Am Ac of Audiology 19 (6):507–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., M. Spratford, B. Kirby, and M. Brennan. 2017. “Individual Differences in Language and Working Memory Affect Children's Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (5):306–315. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1266703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., M. K. Miller, E. Buss, and L. J. Leibold. 2020. “Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.” J Speech Lang Hear Res 16 (63(10):3525–3538.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. 1956. “The Magical Number Seven Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review 63 (2):81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., G. A. Heise, and W. Lichten. 1951. “The Intelligibility of Speech as a Function of the Context OF THE Test Materials.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):329–335. doi:10.1037/h0062491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, G. A., and P. E. Nicely. 1955. “An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 27 (2):338–352. doi:10.1121/1.1907526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motlagh Zadeh, L., N. H. Silbert, K. Sternasty, W. Swanepoel, L. L. Hunter, and D. R. Moore. 2019. “Extended High-Frequency Hearing Enhances Speech Perception in Noise.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (47):23753–23759. doi:10.1073/pnas.1903315116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, A. C., M. Wroblewski, J. Hajicek, and A. Rubinstein. 2010. “Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-Hearing Children and Adults.” Ear & Hearing 31 (3):336–344. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d3d514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., A. Caldwell-Tarr, E. Tarr, J. H. Lowenstein, C. Rice, and A. C. Moberly. 2013. “Improving Speech-in-Noise Recognition for Children with Hearing Loss: Potential Effects of Language Abilities, Binaural Summation, and Head Shadow.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (8):513–525. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.792957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Donoghue, G. 2013. “Cochlear implants – Science, Serendipity and Success.” New England Journal of Medicine 369 (13):1190–1193. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1310111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, A. R., S. Sheppard, and D. H. Marshall. 1991. “Prediction of Hearing Thresholds in Children Using an Automated Toy Discrimination Test.” British Journal of Audiology 25 (5):351–356. doi:10.3109/03005369109076609.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schaerlakens, A. D., and Kohnstamm M. Lejaegere. 1999. Streeflijst woordenschat voor zesjarigen in Nederland en België. Lisse: Swetz & Zeitlinger Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Schirkonyer, V., A. Keilmann, C. Harmuth, B. Wachtlin, T. Rader, and A. Bohnert. 2020. “The New Mainz Speech Test for Children 3-7 years old (MATCH): Design, Standardization, and Validation.” Hno 68 (S1):43–49. doi:10.1007/s00106-019-00793-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobon, K. A., N. M. Taleb, E. Buss, J. H. Grose, and L. Calandruccio. 2019. “Psychometric Function Slope for Speech-in-Noise and Speech-in-Speech: Effects of Development and Aging.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145 (4):EL284–EL290. doi:10.1121/1.5097377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommers, M. S., K. I. Kirk, and D. B. Pisoni. 1997. “Some Considerations in Evaluating Spoken Word Recognition by Normal-Hearing, Noise-Masked Normal-Hearing, and Cochlear Implant Listeners. I: The Effects of Response Format.” Ear and Hearing 18 (2):89–99. doi:10.1097/00003446-199704000-00001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, A., G. D. Givens, L. J. Walker, and S. Elangovan. 2006. “Auditory Temporal Resolution in Normal-Hearing Preschool Children Revealed by Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (4):1946–1949. doi:10.1121/1.2178700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talarico, M., G. Abdilla, M. Aliferis, I. Balazic, I. Giaprakis, T. Stefanakis, K. Foenander, D. Grayden, and A. Paolini. 2007. “Effect of Age and Cognition on Childhood Speech in Noise Perception Abilities.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 12 (1):13–19. doi:10.1159/000096153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2005. “Normalization and Feasibility of Speech Understanding Tests for Dutch-speaking Toddlers.” Speech Communication 47 (1-2):169–181. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2005.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2008. “LIST and LINT: Sentences and Numbers for Quantifying Speech Understanding in Severely Impaired Listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6):348–355. doi:10.1080/14992020801895144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., J. Wouters, and V. Vandenbroeck. 2008. “Normering en Toepassing van Göttinger Spraakverstaantest in Ruis Bij Ernstig Slechthorende Kleuters.” Logopedie 21:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2015. “What Can We Expect of Normally-Developing Children Implanted at a Young Age with Respect to Their Auditory, Linguistic and Cognitive Skills?” Hearing Research 322:171–179. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PMID: 25219955. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2014.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., N. M. Farmer, A. Gandhi, E. Shelburne, and J. Weaver. 2010. “Normative Data for the Words-in-Noise Test for 6- to 12-year-old Children.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53 (5):1111–1121. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0270).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., W. Damman, and A. Bosman. 1994. “Vlaamse Opname Van Woordenlijsten Voor Spraakaudiometrie.” Logopedie 7:28–33.
   Google Scholar
• Zink, I., and M. Lejaegere. 2002. “N-CDIs: Lijsten Voor Communicatieve Ontwikkeling. Een Nieuw Instrument Voor Vroege Taalscreening.” Logopedie 15:23–32.
   Google Scholar