Full-array channel discrimination in cochlear implants: validation and clinical application

References

• Baumann, U, and A. Nobbe. 2004. “Pitch Ranking with Deeply Inserted Electrode Arrays.” Ear and Hearing 25 (3):275–283. doi:10.1097/00003446-200406000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A, and L. Litvak. 2016. “Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception.” Trends in Hearing 20:233121651665338–233121651665312. doi:10.1177/2331216516653389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer, J. A, and K. F. Faulkner. 2010. “Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels with Poor Electrode-Neuron Interface: Partial Tripolar, Single-Channel Thresholds and Psychophysical Tuning Curves.” Ear and Hearing 31 (2): 247–258. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c7daf4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesheuvel, J. D., J. J. Briaire, M. A. de Jong, S. Boehringer, and J. H. Frijns. 2019. “Channel Discrimination along All Contacts of the Cochlear Implant Electrode Array and Its Relation to Speech Perception.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (5): 262–268. doi:10.1080/14992027.2019.1573384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J, and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” Audiology 34 (5): 260–284. doi:10.3109/00206099509071918.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briaire, J. J, and J. H. Frijns. 2006. “The Consequences of Neural Degeneration Regarding Optimal Cochlear Implant Position in Scala Tympani: A Model Approach.” Hearing Research 214 (1–2): 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2006.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., P. K. Dawson, and L. Z. Borden. 2011. “Within-Subjects Comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 Speech Processing Strategies: Speech Perception and Its Relation to Place-Pitch Sensitivity.” Ear and Hearing 32 (2): 238–250. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fb8390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., H. A. Kreft, and L. Litvak. 2005. “Place-Pitch Discrimination of Single- versus Dual-Electrode Stimuli by Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (2): 623–626. doi:10.1121/1.1937362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., D. B. Koch, M. Downing, and L. Litvak. 2007. “Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Otology & Neurotology 28 (5): 629–636. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns, J. H., W. Martin, C. Klop, R. M. Bonnet, and J. J. Briaire. 2003. “Optimizing the Number of Electrodes with High-Rate Stimulation of the Clarion CII Cochlear Implant.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 123 (2): 138–142. doi:10.1080/0036554021000028126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goehring, J. L., D. L. Neff, J. L. Baudhuin, and M. L. Hughes. 2014. “Pitch Ranking, Electrode Discrimination, and Physiological Spread of Excitation Using Current Steering in Cochlear Implants.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (6): 3159–3171. doi:10.1121/1.4900634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmeder, M. L., C. A. Verschuur, R. M. van Besouw, A. M. Wheatley, and T. A. Newman. 2019. “Measurement of Pitch Perception as a Function of Cochlear Implant Electrode and Its Effect on Speech Perception with Different Frequency Allocations.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (3): 158–166. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1516048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanekom, J. J, and R. V. Shannon. 1996. “Place Pitch Discrimination and Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 43 (1): 27–40. doi:10.4102/sajcd.v43i1.236.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenway, B., Y. C. Tam, Z. Vanat, F. Harris, R. Gray, J. Birchall, R. Carlyon, and P. Axon. 2015. “Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes.” Otology & Neurotology 36 (9): 1472–1479. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, D. B., M. Downing, M. J. Osberger, L. Litvak, and S. Greco. 2007. “Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users.” Ear and Hearing 28 (Suppl. 2): 38–41. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803150de.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, B. J, and C. van den Honert. 2006. “Dual-Electrode Pitch Discrimination with Sequential Interleaved Stimulation by Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (1): EL1–6. doi:10.1121/1.2208152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1971. “Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 (2B): 467–477. doi:10.1121/1.1912375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, H. J, and C. M. McKay. 1994. “Pitch Ranking with Nonsimultaneous Dual-Electrode Electrical Stimulation of the Cochlea.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96 (1): 155–162. doi:10.1121/1.410475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, C. M., H. J. McDermott, and R. P. Carlyon. 2000. “Place and Temporal Cues in Pitch Perception: Are They Truly Independent?” Acoustics Research Letters Online 1 (1): 25–30. doi:10.1121/1.1318742.
   Google Scholar
• Schütt, H. H., S. Harmeling, J. H. Macke, and F. A. Wichmann. 2016. “Painfree and Accurate Bayesian Estimation of Psychometric Functions for (Potentially) Overdispersed Data.” Vision Research 122:105–123. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2016.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V. 1983. “Multichannel Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve in Man. I. Basic Psychophysics.” Hearing Research 12 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1016/0378-5955(83)90115-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R., Q.-J. Fu, and J. Galvin Iii. 2004. “The Number of Spectral Channels Required for Speech Recognition Depends on the Difficulty of the Listening Situation.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 124 (0): 50–54. doi:10.1080/03655230410017562.
   Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers, J., J. J. Briaire, F. J. Vanpoucke, and J. H. Frijns. 2011. “Influence of Widening Electrode Separation on Current Steering Performance.” Ear and Hearing 32 (2): 221–229. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181f8c0fe.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snel-Bongers, J., J. J. Briaire, F. J. Vanpoucke, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2012. “Spread of Excitation and Channel Interaction in Single- and Dual-Electrode Cochlear Implant Stimulation.” Ear and Hearing 33 (3): 367–376. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318234efd5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, B., N. Cotter, D. Van Compernolle, and R. L. White. 1987. “Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 82 (1): 106–115. doi:10.1121/1.395554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist, B. M., R. M. Joemai, J. J. Briaire, W. M. Teeuwisse, Wouter J. H. Veldkamp, and J. H. Frijns. 2010. “Cochlear Coordinates in Regard to Cochlear Implantation: A Clinically Individually Applicable 3 Dimensional CT-BBased Method.” Otology & Neurotology 31 (5): 738–744. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d8d3c4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist, B. M., M. W. Skinner, L. T. Cohen, P. A. Leake, C. James, C. Boëx, T. A. Holden, C. C. Finley, P. S. Roland, J. T. Roland, et al. 2010. “Consensus Panel on a Cochlear Coordinate System Applicable in Histologic, Physiologic, and Radiologic Studies of the Human Cochlea.” Otology & Neurotology 31 (5): 722–730. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d279e0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbist, B. M., Johan H. M. Frijns, J. Geleijns, and M. A. V. Buchem. 2005. “Multisection CT as a Valuable Tool in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Patients Multisection CT as a Valuable Tool in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implant Patients.” AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology 26 (2): 424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwolan, T. A., L. M. Collins, and G. H. Wakefield. 1997. “Electrode Discrimination and Speech Recognition in Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Subjects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (6): 3673–3685. doi:10.1121/1.420401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar