The role of working memory in speech recognition by hearing-impaired older listeners: does the task matter?

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (Supp 2), SS53–SS71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. 2012. “Working memory: theories, models, and controversies.” Annual Review of Psychology 63:1–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser, J., T. Koelewijn, A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2013. “How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise - A review.” Trends in Amplification 17 (2):75–93. doi:10.1177/1084713813495459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conway, A. R., M. J. Kane, M. F. Bunting, D. Z. Hambrick, O. Wilhelm, and R. W. Engle. 2005. “Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (5):769–786. doi:10.3758/BF03196772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, R. D., D. M. Hawkins, and S. Weisberg. 1992. “Comparison of model misspecification diagnostics using residuals from least mean of squares and least median of squares fits.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87 (418):419–424. doi:10.1080/01621459.1992.10475221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. 1998. “Attention and memory: An integrated framework.” Oxford Psychology Series, No. 26. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. 2017. “The many faces of working memory and short-term storage.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 24 (4):1158–1170. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1191-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N., N. M. Fristoe, E. M. Elliott, R. P. Brunner, and J. S. Saults. 2006. “Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults.” Memory & Cognition 34 (8):1754–1768. doi:10.3758/BF03195936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M, and P. A. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual differences in working memory and reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19 (4):450–466. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90312-6.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L, and K. A. Doherty. 2014. “The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults.” Ear & Hearing 35 (6):600–610. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C, and S. Rosen. 2016. “On the (un) importance of working memory in speech-in-noise processing for listeners with normal hearing thresholds.” Frontiers in Psychology 7:1268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallun, F. J, and K. M. Jakien. 2019. “The ability to allocate attentional resources to a memory task predicts speech-on-speech masking for older listeners.” In Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress on Acoustics, Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F. J., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, F. E. 2001. Regression modeling strategies: With applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P, and E. M. Ronchetti. 2009. Robust Statistics. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley,
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., M. K. Bleckley, A. R. A. Conway, and R. W. Engle. 2001. “A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2):169–183. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, M. C., P. A. Niquette, G. I. Gudmundsen, L. J. Revit, and S. Banerjee. 2004. “Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4):2395–2405. doi:10.1121/1.1784440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luis, C. A., A. P. Keegan, and M. Mullan. 2009. “Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 24 (2):197–201. doi:10.1002/gps.2101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MATLAB n.d. Statistics toolbox release 2018b. Natick, MA: The MathWorks, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Meister, H., S. Schreitmüller, L. Grugel, M. Ortmann, D. Beutner, M. Walger, and I. G. Meister. 2013. “Cognitive resources related to speech recognition with a competing talker in young and older listeners.” Neuroscience 232:74–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaraj, N. K. 2017. “Working Memory and Speech Comprehension in Older Adults With Hearing Impairment.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 60 (10):2949–2964. doi:10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine, Z. S., N. A. Phillips, V. Bédirian, S. Charbonneau, V. Whitehead, I. Collin, J. L. Cummings, and H. Chertkow. 2005. “The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 53 (4):695–699. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N, and J. Rönnberg. 2020. “Hearing aid experience and background noise affect the robust relationship between working memory and speech recognition in noise.” International Journal of Audiology 59 (3):208–218. doi:10.1080/14992027.2019.1677951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, M. S. Pedersen, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7):433–441. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.776181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K. 2019. “Working memory and attention - A conceptual analysis and review.” Journal of Cognition 2 (1):36. doi:10.5334/joc.58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing,” Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell, Ö. Dahlström, C. Signoret, S. Stenfelt, M. K. Pichora-Fuller, et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7:31. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider, W, and R. M. Shiffrin. 1977. “Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.” Psychological Review 84 (1):1–66. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., M. Sherman, and P. E. Souza. 2020. “Test administration methods and cognitive test scores in older adults with hearing loss.” Gerontology 66 (1):24–32. doi:10.1159/000500777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiffrin, R. M, and W. Schneider. 1977. “Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.” Psychological Review 84 (2):127–190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P, and K. H. Arehart. 2015. “Robust relationship between reading span and speech recognition in noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (10):705–713. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1043062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. H. Arehart, and T. Neher. 2015. “Working memory and hearing aid processing: Literature findings, future directions, and clinical applications.” Frontiers in Psychology 6:1894. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strori, D., A. R. Bradlow, and P. E. Souza. 2021. “Recognizing foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity: Insights from older listeners with or without hearing loss.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (2):140–150. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1814431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickens, C. D. 1980. “The structure of attentional resources.” In Attention & Performance, Vol. VIII, edited by R. S. Nickerson, 239–257. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, I. S. Johnsrude, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “The effects of working memory capacity and semantic cues on the intelligibility of speech in noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (3):2225–2234. doi:10.1121/1.4817926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar