Vehicle noise: comparison of loudness ratings in the field and the laboratory

References

• Anderson, S., S. Gordon-Salant, and J. R. Dubno. 2018. “Hearing and Aging Effects on Speech Understanding: Challenges and Solutions.” Acoustics Today 14 (4):10–18. doi:10.1121/AT.2018.14.4.12
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and V. Hohmann. 2002. “An Adaptive Procedure for Categorical Loudness Scaling.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 112 (4):1597–1604. doi:10.1121/1.1502902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastl, H. 2004. “Audio-visual Interactions in Loudness Evaluation.” In Proc. of Proc. Int. Congress on Acoustics ICA 2004, 18. Intern. Congress on Acoustics, Kyoto, Japan, Vol. II, 1161–1166. Acoustic Science and Technology for Quality of Life, 4.-09.04.2004. Ed.: Intern. Commission on Acoustics. https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1138383
   Google Scholar
• Fastl, H., and M. Florentine. 2011. “Loudness in Daily Environments.” In Loudness, edited by M. Florentine, A. Popper, and R. Fay, Vol. 37, 199–221. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6712-1_8.
   Google Scholar
• Heeren, W., V. Hohmann, J. E. Appell, and J. L. Verhey. 2013. “Relation between Loudness in Categorical Units and Loudness in Phons and Sones.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (4):EL314–EL319. doi:10.1121/1.4795217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I. 2011. “Speech Intelligibility in Fluctuating Maskers.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research 3: 57–64. https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2011-06.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 16832:2006. 2006. Acoustics—Loudness Scaling by Means of Categories. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. https://www.iso.org/standard/32442.html.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., G. Naylor, D. S. Brungart, A. Caduff, J. Campos, S. Carlile, M. G. Carpenter, et al. 2020. “The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It.” Ear & Hearing 41 (Supplement 1):5S–19S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000944
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keidser, G., A. O’Brien, L. Carter, M. McLelland, and I. Yeend. 2008. “Variation in Preferred Gain with Experience for Hearing-aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (10):621–635. doi:10.1080/14992020802178722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, T. M., and J. K. Kruschke. 2018. “Analyzing Ordinal Data with Metric Models: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79:328–348. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llorach, G., G. Grimm, M. M. Hendrikse, and V. Hohmann. 2018. “Towards Realistic Immersive Audiovisual Simulations for Hearing Research: Capture, Virtual Scenes and Reproduction.” In Proceedings of the 2018 Workshop on Audio-visual Scene Understanding for Immersive Multimedia, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 33–40. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/3264869.3264874
   Google Scholar
• Llorach, G., G. Grimm, M. Vormann, V. Hohmann, and M. Meis. 2020. “Vehicle Driving Actions for Loudness and Annoyance Perception.” [Dataset]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3822311.
   Google Scholar
• Llorach, G., D. Oetting, M. Vormann, C. Fitschen, M. Krüger, M. Schulte, M. Meis, and V. Hohmann. 2022. “Loudness and Annoyance Ratings of Vehicle Noise.” [Dataset]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6519277.
   Google Scholar
• Llorach, G., M. Vormann, V. Hohmann, D. Oetting, C. Fitschen, M. Meis, M. Krüger, and M. Schulte. 2019. “Vehicle Noise: Loudness Ratings, Loudness Models and Future Experiments with Audiovisual Immersive Simulations.” In INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Madrid, Spain, Vol. 259, No. 3, 6752–6759. Institute of Noise Control Engineering. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4276090
   Google Scholar
• Mershon, D. H., D. H. Desaulniers, S. A. Kiefer, T. L. Amerson Jr, and J. T. Mills. 1981. “Perceived Loudness and Visually-determined Auditory Distance.” Perception 10 (5):531–543. doi:10.1068/p100531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, R. G. 2006. “Confidence Intervals for an Effect Size Measure Based on the Mann–Whitney Statistic. Part 2: Asymptotic Methods and Evaluation.” Statistics in Medicine 25 (4):559–573. doi:10.1002/sim.2324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetting, D., J. H. Bach, M. Krueger, M. Vormann, M. Schulte, and M. Meis. 2019. “Subjective Loudness Ratings of Vehicle Noise with the Hearing Aid Fitting Methods NAL-NL2 and trueLOUDNESS.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research 7: 289–296. http://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2019-33.
   Google Scholar
• Oetting, D., V. Hohmann, J. E. Appell, B. Kollmeier, and S. D. Ewert. 2016. “Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Hearing-impaired Listeners.” Hearing Research 335:179–192. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetting, D., V. Hohmann, J. E. Appell, B. Kollmeier, and S. D. Ewert. 2018. “Restoring Perceived Loudness for Listeners with Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 39 (4):664–678. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R. I., and K. Vannest. 2009. “An Improved Effect Size for Single-case Research: Nonoverlap of All Pairs.” Behavior Therapy 40 (4):357–367. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2008.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patsouras, C. 2003. “Geräuschqualität von Fahrzeugen-: Beurteilung, Gestaltung und multimodale Einflüsse,” Dissertation, Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Smeds, K., G. Keidser, J. Zakis, H. Dillon, A. Leijon, F. Grant, E. Convery, and C. Brew. 2006. “Preferred Overall Loudness. II: Listening through Hearing Aids in Field and Laboratory Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (1):12–25. doi:10.1080/14992020500190177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Beurden, M., M. Boymans, M. van Geleuken, D. Oetting, B. Kollmeier, and W. A. Dreschler. 2018. “Potential Consequences of Spectral and Binaural Loudness Summation for Bilateral Hearing Aid Fitting.” Trends in Hearing 22:2331216518805690. doi:10.1177/2331216518805690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar