Development of Custom Sound® Pro software utilising big data and its clinical evaluation

References

• Athalye, S., S. Archbold, I. Mulla, M. Lutman, and T. Nokolopoulous. 2015. “Exploring views on current and future cochlear implant service delivery: the perspectives of users, parents and professionals at cochlear implant centres and in the community.” Cochlear Implants International 16 (5):241–253. doi:10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Botros, A., R. Banna, and S. Maruthurkkara. 2013. “The next generation of Nucleus(®) fitting: A multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7):485–494. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.781277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botros, A., and C. Psarros. 2010. “Neural response telemetry reconsidered: I. The relevance of ECAP threshold profiles and scaled profiles to cochlear implant fitting.” Ear and Hearing 31 (3):367–379. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c9fd86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, L. M., Y. Nie, A. Rout, and M. Heiner. 2020. “Audiologists’ preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report.” Cochlear Implants International 21 (4):179–191. doi:10.1080/14670100.2019.1708553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, P. A., and K. Arora. 2015. “Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing; 37 (3):303–311. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constand, M. K., J. C. MacDermid, V. Dal Bello-Haas, and M. Law. 2014. “Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare.” BMC Health Services Research 14 (1):271–279. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., A. James, and J. Ginis. 1997. “Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and Its Relationship to Several Other Measures of Benefit and Satisfaction Provided by Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 8 (1):27–43. http://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/journal/JAAA_08_01_04.pdf.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, R. S. 2016. “Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.” Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 25 (S 01): S48–S61. doi:10.15265/IYS-2016-s006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garaycochea, O., R. Manrique-Huarte, C. Lazaro, A. Huarte, C. Prieto, M. Alvarez de Linera Alperi, and M. Manrique. 2020. “Comparative study of two different perimodiolar and a straight cochlear implant electrode array: surgical and audiological outcomes.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 277 (1):69–76. doi:10.1007/s00405-019-05680-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govaerts, P. J., B. Vaerenberg, G. De Ceulaer, K. Daemers, C. De Beukelaer, and K. Schauwers. 2010. “Development of a software tool using deterministic logic for the optimization of cochlear implant processor programming.” Otology & Neurotology 31 (6):908–918. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181dd160b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hales, B., M. Terblanche, R. Fowler, and W. Sibbald. 2008. “Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care.” International Journal for Quality in Health Care 20 (1):22–30. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, J. R., M. J. G. Harrison, J. R. A. Mitchell, J. S. Prichard, and C. Seymour. 1975. “Medical Education Relative Contributions of History-taking, Physical Examination, and Laboratory Investigation to Diagnosis and Management of Medical Outpatients,” British Medical Journal. 2 (5969):486–489. doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5969.486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemmingson, C., and J. J. Messersmith. 2018. “Cochlear Implant Practice Patterns: The U.S. Trends with Pediatric Patients.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (8):722–733. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17011.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henkin, Y., R. Kaplan-Neeman, C. Muchnik, J. Kronenberg, and M. Hildesheimer. 2003. “Changes over time in the psycho-electric parameters in children with cochlear implants.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (5):274–278. doi:10.3109/14992020309078346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, M. L., K. R. Vander Werff, C. J. Brown, P. J. Abbas, D. M. Kelsay, H. F. Teagle, and M. W. Lowder. 2001. “A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.” Ear and Hearing 22 (6):471–486. doi:10.1097/00003446-200112000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDA Institute. n.d. Understanding the Elements of person-centered care. https://learninghall.idainstitute.com/content
   Google Scholar
• Incerti, P. V., T. Y. C. Ching, S. Hou, P. Van Buynder, C. Flynn, and R. Cowan. 2018. “Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (Sup2):S27–S40. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1370139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddle, K., R. Beswick, E. J. Fitzgibbons, and C. Driscoll. 2022. “Aetiology of permanent childhood hearing loss at a population level.” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 58 (3):440–447. doi:10.1111/jpc.15738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J. 2009. Verfahren zur Anpassung und Evaluation von Cochlear Implant Sprachprozessoren (1st ed.). Heidelberg, Germany: Median Verlag von Killisch-Horn GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Deile, J., N. Neben, N. Dillier, A. Büchner, A. Mewes, F. Junge, W. Lai, M. Schuessler, and M. Hey. 2021. “Comparisons of electrophysiological and psychophysical fitting methods for cochlear implants.” International Journal of Audiology 1–11. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.2015543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. 1994. “Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, 152–158. Boston, MA: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/191666.191729.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, P. J. 1990. “Normative data: their definition, interpretation, and importance for primary care physicians.” Family Medicine 22 (4):307–311. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2200734.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saunders, E., L. Cohen, A. Aschendorff, W. Shapiro, M. Knight, M. Stecker, B. Richter, S. Waltzman, M. Tykocinski, T. Roland, et al. 2002. “Threshold, comfortable level and impedance changes as a function of electrode-modiolar distance.” Ear and Hearing 23 (1 Suppl):28–40. doi:10.1097/00003446-200202001-00004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, C., M. Mortz, and N. Vaughan. 1999. “Perhaps not by prescription, but by perception.” Hearing Journal 3:58–62.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. W., L. K. Holden, T. A. Holden, and M. E. Demorest. 2000. “Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant recipients’ thresholds and maximum acceptable loudness levels.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 11 (4):203–213. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10783923. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1748046.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., P. J. Govaerts, T. Stainsby, P. Nopp, A. Gault, and D. Gnansia. 2014. “A Uniform Graphical Representation of Intensity Coding in Current-Generation Cochlear Implant Systems.” Ear and Hearing 3:1. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000039.
   Google Scholar
• Vaerenberg, B., C. Smits, G. De Ceulaer, E. Zir, S. Harman, N. Jaspers, Y. Tam, M. Dillon, T. Wesarg, D. Martin-Bonniot, et al. 2014. “Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art.” TheScientificWorldJournal 2014:501738. 2014(August 2013), doi:10.1155/2014/501738.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Beek, F. B., J. J. Briaire, and J. H. M. Frijns. 2015. “Population-Based Prediction of Fitting Levels for Individual Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 20 (1):1–16. doi:10.1159/000362779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathour, J., P. J. Govaerts, and N. Deggouj. 2021. “Variability of fitting parameters across cochlear implant centres.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 278 (12):4671–4679. doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06572-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesarg, T., R. Battmer, L. Cavall, N. Dillier, L. Garcia-Ib, M. Hey, A. H. Irujo, A. Morsnowski, F. Erwin, and F. Guido. 2010. Effect of changing pulse rate on profile parameters of perceptual thresholds and loudness comfort levels and relation to ECAP thresholds in recipients of the Nucleus CI24RE device. 775–787. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.4924.
   Google Scholar
• Willeboer, C. 2008. Simplifying cochlear implant speech processor fitting. Veenendaal, Netherlands: Universal Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services (US HHS). Guidance regarding methods for de-identification of protected health information in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/special-topics/de-identification/index.html
   Google Scholar
• WHO 2021. World report on hearing. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/world-report-on-hearing
   Google Scholar