Comparison of three calibration procedures for free-field reference speech audiometry

References

• Amlani, A. M., J. L. Punch, and T. Y. C. Ching. 2002. “Methods and Applications of the Audibility Index in Hearing Aid Selection and Fitting.” Trends in Amplification 6 (3):81–129. doi:10.1177/108471380200600302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 1997. Methods for calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI S3.5-1997.
   Google Scholar
• ANSI (American National Standards Institute). 2018. Specification for audiometers. ANSI S3.6-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Baljić, I., A. Winkler, T. Schmidt, and I. Holube. 2016. “Untersuchungen zur perzeptiven Äquivalenz der Testlisten im Freiburger Einsilbertest” [Evaluation of the perceptual equivalence of test lists in the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test].” Hno 64 (8):572–583. doi:10.1007/s00106-016-0192-0.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2008. “The Performance/Intensity Function: An Underused Resource.” Ear and Hearing 29 (4):479–491. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174f067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J. 1989. “Speech perception by the hearing impaired”. PhD diss., University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1992. “Word lists for speech audiometry”. Dutch Association of Audiology (NVA). CD-ROM.
   Google Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1995. “Intelligibility of Dutch CVC Syllables and Sentences for Listeners with Normal Hearing and with Three Types of Hearing Impairment.” Audiology: official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 34 (5):260–284. doi:10.3109/00206099509071918.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bosman, A. J., J. Wouters, and W. Damman. 1995. “Realisatie van een CD voor spraakaudiometrie in Vlaanderen” [Realisation of a Compact Disc for speech audiometry in Flanders].” Logopedie en Foniatrie 9:218–225.
   Google Scholar
• Breakey, M. R., and H. Davis. 1949. “Comparisons of Thresholds for Speech; Word and Sentence Tests; Receiver vs Field and Monaural vs Binaural Listening.” Laryngoscope 59:236–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K. 1974a. “The New Recording of ‘Words for Testing Hearing with Speech.” Journal of Audiological Technique 13:12–41.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K. 1974b. “The New Recording of the MARBURG Sentence Intelligibility Test.” Journal of Audiological Technique 13:190–207.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K., and H. G. Diestel. 1970. “Tests with the Speech Audiometer. Part III: The Result of Hearing Tests.” Journal of Audiological Technique 9:114–127.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K., and U. Richter. 1989. “Free-Field Sensitivity Level of Audiometric Earphones to be Used for Speech Audiometer Calibration.” Scandinavian Audiology 18 (2):75–81. doi:10.3109/01050398909070726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K., and U. Richter. 1997. “Ensuring Reliability and Comparability of Speech Audiometry in Germany.” In Speech audiometry, edited by M. Martin, Chapter 6: 106–131. 2nd ed. London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, K., H. G. Diestel, and H. Mrass. 1969. “Tests with the Speech Audiometer. Part II: Electric-Acoustical Transmission Properties.” Journal of Audiological Technique 8: 126–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W., A. J. Bosman, and G. F. Smoorenburg. 1993. “A Model for Context Effects in Speech Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93 (1):499–509. doi:10.1121/1.406844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bug, M. U., and T. Fedtke. 2022. “Free-Field Correction Values for RadioEar DD65v2 Circumaural Audiometric Headphones.” International Journal of Audiology 61 (7):615–620. doi:10.1080/14992027.2021.1998678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, D. D., R. W. Stream, and R. H. Wilson. 1972. “Speech Audiometry: Earphone And Sound Field.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 37 (2):162–176. doi:10.1044/jshd.3702.176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fastl, H. 1979. “Comparison of DT 48, TDH 49, and TDH 39 earphones.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (3):702–703. doi:10.1121/1.383219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastl, H., and E. Zwicker. 1983. “A Free-Field Equalizer for TDH 39 Earphones.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73 (1):312–314. doi:10.1121/1.388811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastl, H., and H. Fleischer. 1978. “Freifeldübertragungsmasse Verschiedener Elektrodynamischer Und Elektrostatischer Kopfhörer” [Freefield response of different electrodynamic and electrostatic earphones].” Acustica 39:182–188.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, H. 1950. “A Method of Calculating Hearing Loss for Speech from an Audiogram.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22 (1):1–5. doi:10.1121/1.1906567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, N. R., and J. C. Steinberg. 1947. “Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 19 (1):90–119. doi:10.1121/1.1916407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2009. Electroacoustics - Simulators of human head and ear - Part 1: Ear simulator for the measurement of supra-aural and circumaural earphones. IEC 60318-1:2009.
   Google Scholar
• IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2010. Sound system equipment - Part 7: Headphones and earphones. IEC 60268-7:2010.
   Google Scholar
• IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2011. Sound system equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index. IEC 60268-16:2011.
   Google Scholar
• IEC (International Electrotechnical Commission). 2017. Electroacoustics - Audiometric equipment - Part 1: Equipment for pure-tone and speech audiometry. IEC 60645-1:2017.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2010. Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 1: Pure-tone air and bone conduction audiometry. ISO 8253-1:2010.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2012. Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 3: Speech audiometry. ISO 8253-3:2012.
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2017. Acoustics - Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment - Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. ISO 389-1:2017.
   Google Scholar
• Killion, M. C. 1978. “Revised Estimate of Minimum Audible Pressure: Where is the “Missing 6 dB”?” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (5):1501–1508. doi:10.1121/1.381844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulsen, T. 2011. “Free-Field Correction Values for Interacoustics DD 45 Supra-Aural Audiometric Earphones.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (6):361–366. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.551787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PTB (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt). 1992. Characteristic data of sound transducers used in audiometry. PTB-Bericht MA-27.
   Google Scholar
• Thiele, C., N. Wardenga, T. Lenarz, and A. Büchner. 2014. “Überprüfung der Vergleichbarkeit von Freifeld- und HDA200-Kopfhörermessungen für den Freiburger Sprachtest” [Testing the comparability of free-field and HDA200 headphone measurements for the Freiburg speech test]. Zeitschrift.” Hno 62 (2):115–120. doi:10.1007/s00106-013-2789-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., R. M. Johnson, and W. O. Olsen. 1966. “Earphone Versus Sound-field Threshold Sound-Pressure Levels for Spondee Words.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39 (1):125–133. doi:10.1121/1.1909860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, F. M., and D. A. Ross. 1946. “The Pressure Distribution in the Auditory Canal in a Progressive Sound Field.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 18 (2):401–408. doi:10.1121/1.1916378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, R., and D. Pecher. 2015. “A Method for Simultaneously Counterbalancing Condition Order and Assignment of Stimulus Materials to Conditions.” Behavior Research Methods 47 (1):127–133. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0476-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E., and D. Maiwald. 1963. “Über das Freifeldübertragungsmass des Kopfhörers DT 48” [On the free field response of the earphone DT 48].” Acustica 13:181–183.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker, E., and R. Feldtkeller. 1967. Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfanger [The human ear as a receiver of information], 2nd ed. Stuttgart: S. Hirzel Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Zychaluk, K., and D. H. Foster. 2009. “Model-Free Estimation of the Psychometric Function.” Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 71 (6):1414–1425. doi:10.3758/APP.71.6.1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar