4,944
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Predicting Post-Discharge Community Violence in England and Wales Using the HCR-20V3

, , , , &

REFERENCES

  • Coid, J., Hickey, N., Kahtan, N., Zhang, T., & Yang M. (2009). Patients discharged from medium secure forensic psychiatry services: reconvictions and risk factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, 223–229. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.018788
  • Coid, J., Ullrich, S., & Kallis, C. (2013). Predicting future violence among individuals with psychopathy. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 387–388. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.118471.
  • Cooke, D., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive validity in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 259–274. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9176-x
  • Department of Health and Social Security (1975). Report of the Committee on Mentally Abnormal Offenders (Butler Report). CMMD 624: London, UK: HMSO.
  • Department of Health (2007). Best practice in managing risk: Principles and evidence for best practice in the assessment and management of risk to self and others. Document prepared for Care Services Improvement Partnership and the National Mental Health Risk Management Programme. London, UK: Department of Health.
  • Dolan, M., & Khawaja, A. (2004). The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UK. Aggressive Behavior, 30, 469–483. doi: 10.1002/ab.20044
  • Douglas, K., Cox, D., & Webster, C. (1999). Violence risk assessment: science and practice. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 184–194. doi: 10.1348/135532599167824
  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
  • Douglas, K., Hart, S., Webster, C., Belfrage, H., & Eaves, D. (2008). Historical, Clinical and Risk Management (Version 3 Draft version). Simon Fraser University, BC, Canada.
  • Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A. J. E., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #1. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
  • Doyle, M. (2011). Risk research. In K. Sheldon, J. Davies, & K. Howells (Eds.), Research practice for forensic professionals (pp. 37–59). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Doyle, M., Dolan, M. C., & McGovern, J. (2002). The validity of North American risk assessment tools in predicting inpatient violent behaviour in England. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 7, 141–154.
  • Doyle, M., Carter, S., Shaw, J., & Dolan, M. (2012). Predicting community violence from patients discharged from acute mental health units in England. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 47, 627–637. doi: 10.1007/s00127-011-0366-8.
  • Doyle, M., & Dolan, M. (2006). Predicting community violence from patients discharged from mental health services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 189, 520–526. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.021204
  • Doyle, M., & Dolan, M. (2008). Understanding and managing risk. In K. Soothill, P. Rogers, & M. Dolan (Eds.). Handbook of forensic mental health. Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
  • Eidhammer, G., Selmer, L. Bjorkly, S., & the SAFE Pilot Project Group (2013). A brief report of a comparison of the HCR-20 (Version 2) and HCR-20 (Version 3) concerning internal consistency and clinical utility. Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hosptal, Norway.
  • Gray, N. S., Taylor, J., Snowden, R. J. (2008). Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 192, 384–387. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.044065.
  • Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. (2007). Empirical Support for the HCR-20: A Critical Analysis of the Violence Literature. Center for Mental Health Services Research Publications and Presentations. Paper 334. Retrieved from http://escholarship.umassmed.edu/psych_cmhsr/334, January 30, 2013
  • Hart, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the `margins of error’ of group v. individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190, s60–s65. doi: 10.1192/bjp.190.s60
  • Hickey, N., Yang, M., & Coid, J. (2009). The development of the Medium Security Recidivism Assessment Guide (MSRAG): an actuarial risk prediction instrument. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 202–224.
  • Lewis, G., & Doyle, M. (2009). Risk Formulation: What are we doing and why? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 286–292. doi: 10.1080/14999011003635696.
  • Maden, A., Rutter, T., McClintock, C. Friendship, C., & Gunn, J. (1999). Outcome of admissions to a secure psychiatric unit. I. Short and long term outcome. British Journal of Psychiatry, 175, 313–316. doi: 10.1192/bjp.175.4.313.
  • Maden, A., Skapinakis, P., Lewis, G., Scott, F., Burnett, R., & Jamieson, E. (2006). Gender differences in reoffending after discharge from medium secure units. British Journal of Psychiatry. 189, 168–172. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.014613.
  • Ministry of Justice (2010). Statistics of mentally disordered offenders 2008 England and Wales. Retrieved from http: //www.justice.gov.uk/publications/mentallydisorderedoffenders.htm, January 29, 2010.
  • Monahan, J. (1988). Risk assessment of violence among the mentally disordered: Generating useful knowledge. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 11, 249–257. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(88)90012-X.
  • Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., et al. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Mulvey, E. P., Shaw, E., & Lidz, C. W. (1994). Why use multiple sources in research on patient violence in the community? Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 4, 253–258.
  • Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health (2007). Forensic mental health services: Facts and figures on current provision. London, UK: SCMH.
  • Skeem, J. L., Monahan, J. (2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 38–42. doi: 10.1177/0963721410397271
  • Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997) HCR 20 - Version 2. Assessing Risk for Violence. Burnaby, BC, Canada: Simon Fraser University.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.