The Use of the HCR-20^V3 in Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Practice

REFERENCES

• Andrews, D. A. (2012). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and treatment. In J. A. Dvoskin, J. L. Skeem, R. W. Novaco, & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Using social science to reduce violent offending (pp. 127–156). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A, & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct.5th ed. New Providence, NJ: Anderson Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, R. W. & Ireland, M. (2004). Reducing risk, increasing protective factors: Findings from the Caribbean Youth Health Survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 493–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V. (2005). Structured risk assessment of (sexual) violence in forensic clinical practice. The HCR-20 and SVR-20 in Dutch forensic psychiatric patients. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Dutch University Press. Available: http://dare.uva.nl/document/13725.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2006). Structured Professional Judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: A prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12, 321–336. doi:10.1080/10683160600569029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2009). SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. (English version). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. 2nd Edition. (English version). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2013). Working with women. Towards a more gender-sensitive violence risk assessment (pp. 224–241). In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice. London, UK: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Vries Robbé, M., Bouman, Y., Chakhssi, F., & de Ruiter, C. (2013a). HCR-20^V3: Beoordelen van het risico van geweld - Gebruikershandleiding [HCR-20^V3. Assessing risk for violence. User guide]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Vries Robbé, M., Bouman, Y.H.A., Chakhssi, F., & de Ruiter, C. (2013b). Innovatie in risicotaxatie van geweld: De HCR-20V3 [Innovation in violence risk assessment: The HCR-20V3]. Gedragstherapie, 46, 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Vries Robbé, M., van Kalmthout, W., & Place, C. (2012). Female Additional Manual (FAM). Additional guidelines to the HCR-20 for assessing risk for violence in women. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Van der Hoeven Stichting.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & de Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients. A retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 178–186. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.600232
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Douglas, K. S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24, 440–457. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H.L.I. (2014). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence correspond to long-term reductions in violent recidivism. Accepted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Wever, E. C., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H.L.I. (2014). Risk and protective factors for inpatient aggression: Differences between treatment stages and patient groups. Submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristics curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics, 44, 837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A.J.E., Guy, L. S., & Weir, J. (2010). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. Available: http://kdouglas.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/hcr-20-annotated-biblio-sept-2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. A. (2010). Historical Clinical Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) Violence risk assessment scheme: Rationale, application, and empirical overview. In R. K. Otto, & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment. International perspectives on forensic mental health (pp. 147–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Skeem, J. L., & Nicholson, E. (2011). Research methods in violence risk assessment. In B. Rosenfeld, & S. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 325–346). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Mansilla, A., Rosenfeld, B., & Nicholls, T.L. (2009). Risk assessment: Are current methods applicable to women? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 50–61. doi:10.1080/14999010903014747
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L.S., Douglas, K.S., & Hendry, M.C. (2010). The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 551–580. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (1991). Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised Second Edition. Technical Manual. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Yasuhara, K., & Shah, S. (2010). Violence risk assessment tools: Overview and critical analysis. In R.K. Otto, & K.S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment. International perspectives on forensic mental health (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kreis, M. F., & Cooke, D. J. (2012). The manifestation of psychopathic traits in women: An exploration using case examples. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health Services, 11, 267–279. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2012.746755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1999). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (Version 3). Vancouver: British Columbia Institute against Family Violence.
   Google Scholar
• McKeown, A. (2010). Female offenders: Assessment of risk in forensic settings. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 422–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, R. K., & Douglas, K. S. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of violence risk assessment. International perspectives on forensic mental health (pp. 147–185). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Philipse, M., Ruiter, C. de, Hildebrand, M., & Bouman, Y. (2000). HCR-20. Beoordelen van het risico van gewelddadig gedrag. Versie 2 [HCR-20. Assessing the risk of violence. Version 2]. Nijmegen / Utrecht: Prof. mr. W.P.J. Pompestichting / Dr. Henri van der Hoeven Stichting.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 595–605. doi:10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). The international risk survey (IRiS) project: Perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment tools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20. Assessing the risk of violence. Version 2. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Müller-Isberner, R., & Fransson, G. (2002). Violence risk assessment: Using structured clinical guidelines professionally. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 185–193. doi:10.1080/14999013.2002.10471173
   Google Scholar
• Werkgroep Risicotaxatie Forensische Psychiatrie (WRFP) (2003). Handleiding HKT-30 Versie 2002. Risicotaxatie in de forensische psychiatrie [Manual HKT-30 Version 2002. Risk assessment in forensic psychiatry]. The Hague, The Netherlands: Ministerie van Justitie, Dienst Justitiële Inrichtingen.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S.C.P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi: 10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar