Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20^V3): Development and Overview

REFERENCES

• Andrews, D. A. (2012). The risk-need-responsivity (RNR) model of correctional assessment and treatment. In J. A. Dvoskin, J. L. Skeem, R. W. Novaco, & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Using social science to reduce violent offending (pp. 127–156). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, S. J. (2010). The Level of Service (LS) assessment of adults and older adolescents. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 199–225). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. (2013). Dynamic risk factors in violence risk assessment: A multiple time-point evaluation of the HCR-20 and START. Unpublished master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A., & Douglas, K. S. (2011, March). APLS Undergraduate Paper Award (First Place): The Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-Version 3: The inclusion of idiographic relevance ratings in violence risk assessment. Invited poster presented at the annual convention of the American-Psychology Law Society, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard, A. J. E., & Douglas, K. S. (2014). Dynamic risk: A prospective repeated measures examination of the HCR-20 and START. Presentation given at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society (Division 41 of the American Psychological Association), New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Manual for the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Lodewijks, H., Bartel, P. A., & Forth, A. E. (2010). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chermack, T. J., & van der Merwe, L. (2003). The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning. Futures, 35, 445–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., Van Dorn, R. A., Johnson, K. L., Grimm, K. J., Douglas, K. S., & Swartz, M. S. (2014, February 13). Community violence and victimization among adults with mental illness. American Journal of Public Health. Advance online publication. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301680
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Douglas, K. S. (in press). A primer on violence risk assessment. Science and the Courts.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A., & Hendry, M. (2013). Violence risk assessment and management: Putting structured professional judgment into practice. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Risk assessment and management: Clinical guidelines for effective practice (pp. 29–55). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Groscup, J. L., & Litwack, T. R. (2014). Assessing violence risk. In I. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20^V3: Assessing risk for violence – User guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Nicholls, T. L., & Brink, J. (2009). Reducing the risk of violence among persons with mental illness: A critical analysis of treatment approaches. In P. M. Kleespies (Ed.), Behavioral emergencies: An evidence-based resource for evaluating and managing risk of suicide, violence, and victimization (pp. 351–376). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. (2010). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and review of the research. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #1. Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. Available at HCR-20.com.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Skeem, J. L. (2005). Violence risk assessment: Getting specific about being dynamic. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 347–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Strand, S., & Belfrage, H. (2011, June). Dynamic risk: Evaluating the nature and predictive validity of change on the Clinical and Risk Management scales of the HCR-20. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Webster, C. D., Hart, S. D., Eaves, D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (Eds.) (2001). HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345, e4692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Douglas, K. S., & Hendry, M. C. (2010). The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 551–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., Hart, S. D., & Douglas, K. S. (in press). Risk assessment and communication. In B. Cutler & P. Zapf (Eds.), APA handbook of forensic psychology. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2007). Empirical support for the HCR-20: A critical analysis of the violence literature. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #2. Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. Available at HCR-20.com.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D. (1998). The role of psychopathy in assessing risk for violence: Conceptual and methodological issues. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Douglas, K. S. (2001). Risk management using the HCR-20: A general overview focusing on historical factors. In K. S. Douglas, C. D. Webster, S. D. Hart, D. Eaves, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide (pp. 27–40). Burnaby, BC, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D. (2003). Violence risk assessment: An anchored narrative approach. In M. Vanderhallen, G. Vervaeke, P. J. Van Koppen, & J. Goethals (Eds.), Much ado about crime: Chapters on psychology and law (pp. 209–230). Brussels, Belgium: Uitgeverij Politeia NV.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgment approach. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S. D., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Yasuhara, K., & Shah, S. (2010). Violence risk assessment tools: Overview and critical analysis. In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 1–17). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C., & Murray, H. A. (1953). Personality formulation: The determinants. In C. Kluckhohn, H. Murray & D. Schneider (Eds.), Personality in nature, society and culture (pp. 53–67). New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Lyon, D. (2008). Guidelines for Stalking Assessment and Management (SAM): User manual. Vancouver, Canada: ProActive ReSolutions Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G., & Doyle, M. (2009). Risk formulation: What are we doing and why? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 286–292.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, S. F., Riaz, M., Webster, C., Hart, S. D., Levander, S., Müller-Isberner, R., … Hodgins, S. (2013). Using the HCR-20 to predict aggressive behavior among men with schizophrenia living in the community: Accuracy of prediction, general and forensic settings, and dynamic risk factors. The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 12, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, J. (1993). Limiting therapist exposure to Tarasoff liability. American Psychologist, 48, 242–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Roth, L. H., Grisso, T., & Banks, S. (2001). Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Ltd. | 2008 Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Ltd., [2008] 2 S.C.R. 114, 2008 SCC 27
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, A. A., Blanchard, A. J. E., & Douglas, K. S. (2014). Risk assessment. In Oxford bibliographies in criminology. Richard Wright (Ed.): New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• R. v. McCraw, 1991 3 SCR 72.
   Google Scholar
• Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, P. (1990). The art of the long view. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013, March). The international risk survey (IRiS) project: Perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment tools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, J. W., Swartz, M. S., Essock, S. M., Osher, F. C., Wagner, H. R., Goodman, L. A., … Meador, K. G. (2002). The social-environmental context of violent behavior in persons treated for severe mental illness. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1523–1531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, K. (1997). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• van Notten, P. W. F., Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M. B. A., & Rothman, D. S. (2003). An updated scenario typology. Futures, 35, 423–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2002). The management of risk and the design of good lives. Australian Psychologist, 37, 172–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Laws, R. (2010). Desistence from sex offending: Motivating change, enriching practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, version 2. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Haque, Q., & Hucker, S. (2014). Violence risk assessment and management: Advances through structured professional judgement and sequential redirections (2nd ed). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step towards treatment integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S. C. P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar