7,589
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the HCR-20 Version 3

&

REFERENCES

  • Belfrage, H. (1998). Implementing the HCR-20 scheme for risk assessment in a forensic psychiatric hospital: Integrating research and clinical practice. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 328–338. doi: 10.1080/09585189808402200
  • Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 567–590. doi: 10.1177/0093854809333610
  • Dernevik, M. (1998). Preliminary findings on reliability and validity of the Historical-Clinical-Risk Assessment in a forensic psychiatric setting. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 4, 127–137. doi: 10.1080/10683169808401753
  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Groscup, J. L., & Litwack, T. R. (2014). Assessing violence risk. In I. Weiner & R. K. Otto (Eds.), The handbook of forensic psychology, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk for violence – User guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
  • Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. (2010). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and review of the research. In R. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 147–185). Oxford, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.
  • Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #1. Mental Health, Law, & Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada. Available at HCR-20.com.
  • Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345, e4692.
  • Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
  • Guy, L. S., Douglas, K. S., & Hendry, M. C. (2010). The role of psychopathic personality disorder in violence risk assessments using the HCR-20. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 551–580. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2010.24.5.551
  • Hart, S. D., & Boer, D. P. (2010). Structured professional judgment guidelines for sexual violence risk assessment: The Sexual Violence Risk–20 (SVR-20) and Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP). In R. K. Otto & K. S. Douglas (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment. New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Hart, S. D., Kropp, P. R., Laws, D. R., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. A. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP): Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
  • Kropp, R. P., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Eaves, D. (1994). Manual for the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment guide. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: The British Columbia Institute Against Family Violence.
  • Landis, J., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • Singh, J. P. (2013, March). The international risk survey (IRiS) project: Perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment tools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Portland, OR.
  • Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
  • Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence, version 2. Burnaby, British Columbia: Simon Fraser University.
  • Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Burnaby, Canada: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission of British Columbia.
  • Yang, M., Wong, S. C. P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi: 10.1037/a0020473

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.