A National Survey of United States Sexually Violent Person Legislation: Policy, Procedures, and Practice

REFERENCES

• 18 U.S.C. § 4247–4248 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• 42 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 6401–6402 ( West, Westlaw through Regular Session Act 2013-72).
   Google Scholar
• Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19. doi: 10.1037/a0029889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 36–3701 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Beasley v. Molett, 95 S.W.3d 590 (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Blacher, R. (1995). Historical perspective of the “Sex Psychopath” statute: From the revolutionary era to the present federal crime bill. Mercer Law Review, 46, 889–920.
   Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Murrie, D. C., Caperton, J. D., & Hawes, S. W. (2009). Field validity of the Static-99 and MnSOST-R among sex offenders evaluated for civil commitment as sexually violent predators. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 278–314. doi:10.1037/a0017232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., & Murrie, D. C. (2008). Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL-R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14, 262–283. doi: 10.1037/a0014523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., Murrie, D. C., Henderson, C. E., & Chevalier, C. (2013). Do scores from risk measures matter to jurors? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 259–269. doi: 10.1037/a0031354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada Criminal Code, §753(1) & (2) (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Com. v. Boucher, 780 N.E.2d 47 (Mass. 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Com. v. Dengler, 890 A.2d 372 ( Pa. 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Community Protection Act, Wash. Rev. Code Ann. § 71.09.010 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Crimes (Serious Sex Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW).
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, M. D., & Reidy, T. J. (1998). Antisocial personality disorder and psychopathy: Diagnostic dilemmas in classifying patterns of antisocial behavior in sentencing evaluations. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 333–351. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099–0798(199822)16:33.0.CO;2-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daley, M. V. (2008). Flawed solution to the sex offender situation in the United States: The legality of chemical castration for sex offenders. Indiana Health Law Review, 5, 87–122.
   Google Scholar
• Dangerous Prisoners (Sexual Offenders) Act 2003 (DPSOA) (Qld 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Dangerous Sexual Offenders Act 2006 (WA).
   Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• DeMatteo, D., Edens, J. F., Galloway, M., Cox, J., Smith, S. T., & Formon, D. (2014). The role and reliability of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in U.S. sexually violent predator evaluations: A case law survey. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 248–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doren, D. M. (1998). Recidivism base rates, predictions of sex offender recidivism, and the “sexual predator” commitment laws. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 16, 97–114. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199824)16:1<97::AID-BSL295>3.0.CO;2-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doren, D. M., & Epperson, D. L. (2001). Great analysis, but problematic assumptions: A critique of Janus and Meehl (1997). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 45–51. doi: 10.1023/A:1009514429496
   Google Scholar
• DSPD Programme, Department of Health, Home Office and HM Prison Service (2006). Dangerous and Severe/Complex Personality Disorder High Secure Services Planning and Delivery Guide for Women's DSPD Services (Primrose Programme). London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• DSPD Programme, Department of Health, Home Office, HM Prison Service (2005). Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) High Secure Services for Men: Planning and Delivery Guide. London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• DSPD Programme, Department of Health, Ministry of Justice and HM Prison Service (2008). Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) High Secure Services for Men: Planning and Delivery Guide. London, UK: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Desforges, D. M., Fernandez, K., & Palac, C. A. (2004). Effects of psychopathy and violence risk testimony on mock juror perceptions of dangerousness in a capital murder trial. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 393–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, C. P. (2011). Justice perverted: Sex offense law, psychology, and public policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fazel, S., & Danesh, J. (2002). Serious mental disorder in 23 000 prisoners: A systematic review of 62 surveys. The Lancet, 359, 545–550. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07740-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitch, W. L. & Hammen, D. A. (2003). The new generation of sex offender commitment laws: Which states have them and how do they work? In B. J. Winick & J. Q. LaFond (Eds.), Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 27–39). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fla. Stat. Ann. § 394.910 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gookin, K. (2007). Comparison of state laws authorizing involuntary commitment of sexually violent predators: 2006 update, revised. (Document No. 07-08-1101). Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, S. D., & Gottfredson, D. M. (1986). Accuracy of prediction models. In A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth, & C. A. Visher (Eds.), Criminal careers and “career criminals” ( Vol. 2, pp. 212–290). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments. New York, NY: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-5046-8
   Google Scholar
• Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd. ed.) New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. K., Harris, A. J., Helmus, L., & Thornton, D. (2014). High-risk sex offenders may not be high risk forever. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2792–2813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, S. M., Boccaccini, M. T., & Murrie, D. C. (2013). Psychopathy and the combination of psychopathy and sexual deviance as predictors of sexual recidivism: Meta-analytic findings using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Psychological Assessment, 25, 233–243. doi: 10.1037/a0030391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Ogloff, J.R.P., & Picarello, K. (1999). Dangerous offender statutes in the United States and Canada: Implications for risk assessment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 393–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• In re A.M., 787 N.W.2d 752 (N.D. 2010).
   Google Scholar
• In re Civil Commitment of W.X.C., 972 A.2d 462 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 2009), aff'd 8 A.3d 174 (N.J. 2010), cert. denied 562 U.S. 1297 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• In re Commitment of Adams, 588 N.W.2d 336, 340 ( Wis. Ct. App. 1998).
   Google Scholar
• In re Commitment of Bohannan, 388 S.W.3d 296 ( Tex. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• In re Commitment of Day, 342 S.W.3d 193, 200 ( Tex. Ct. App. 2011).
   Google Scholar
• In re Commitment of Evers, 420 S.W.3d 81 ( Tex. Ct. App. 2012).
   Google Scholar
• In re Det. of Hodges, 689 N.W.2d 467, 470 ( Iowa 2004).
   Google Scholar
• In re Commitment of W.Z., 801 A.2d 205 ( N.J. 2002).
   Google Scholar
• In re Det. of Thorell, 72 P.3d 708, ( Wash. 2003), cert. denied 541 U.S. 990 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• In re Leon G., 59 P.3d 779 ( Ariz. 2002).
   Google Scholar
• In re R.Y., Jr., 957 A.2d 780 ( Pa. Super. Ct. 2008).
   Google Scholar
• James, N., Thomas, K. R., & Foley, C. (2007, July). Civil commitment of sexually dangerous persons. (Order Code RL34068). Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://research.policyarchive.org/18628.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Janus, E. S. (2013). Preventive detention of sex offenders: The American experience versus international human rights norms. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 328–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kan. Stat. Ann. § 59–29a02 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Kansas v. Crane, 534 U.S. 407 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Karsjens v. Jesson, No. CIV. 11-3659 DWF/JJK, 2015 WL 3755870 ( D. Minn. June 17, 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. (2007). Lock them up-and throw away the key: The preventive detention of sex offenders in the United States and Germany. Georgia Journal of International Law, 39, 551–572.
   Google Scholar
• Keyzer, P. (2010). The United Nations Human Rights Committee's views about the legitimate parameters of the preventive detention of serious sex offenders. Criminal Law Journal, 24, 283–291.
   Google Scholar
• Keyzer, P., & McSherry, B. (2013). The preventive detention of “dangerous” sex offenders in Australia: Perspectives at the coalface. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 2, 296–305. doi: 10.6000/1929-4409.2013.02.29
   Google Scholar
• Krauss, D. A., McCabe, J. G., & Lieberman, J. D. (2012). Dangerously misunderstood: Representative jurors' reaction to expert testimony on future dangerousness in a sexually violent predator trial. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 18–49. doi:10.1037/a0024550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, D. A., & Scurich, N. (2013). Risk assessment in the law: Legal admissibility, scientific validity, and some disparities between research and practice. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31, 215–229. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, D. A. & Scurich, N. (2014). The Impact of case factors on jurors' decisions in a sexual violent predator hearing. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 135–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 15:540 ( West 1997, Westlaw through current through the 2013 Regular Session).
   Google Scholar
• LaFond, J. Q. (2005). Preventing sexual violence: How society should cope with sex offenders. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, T. R. (2008). Only yesterday: The rise and fall of twentieth century sexual psychopath laws. La. L. Rev., 69, 549–591.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2011). Sexually violent predators denied equal protection of the laws by indefinite civil commitment: People v. McKee. Western State University Law Review, 39, 80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Lieb, R. (2003). State policy perspectives on sexual predator laws. In B. J. Winick & J. Q. LaFond (Eds.). Protecting society from sexually dangerous offenders: Law, justice, and therapy (pp. 41–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/10492-002
   Google Scholar
• M. v. Germany, App. No, 19359/04, Eur. Ct. H.R. (2010). Retrieved from http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action = html&documentId = 860012&portal = hbkm&source = externalbydocnumber&table = F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649
   Google Scholar
• Maleng, N. (1991). Community Protection Act and the Sexually Violent Predators Statute. University of Puget Sound Law Review, 15, 821–826.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 499–511. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(88)90146-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercado, C. C. (2006). Preventive detention of sex offenders: A comparative law perspective. Pensamiento psicológico, 7, 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H. A., Amenta, A. E., & Conroy, M. A. (2005). Sexually violent predator evaluations: Empirical evidence, strategies for professionals, and research directions. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 29–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. (2002). Sex-crime panic: A journey to the paranoid heart of the 1950s. New York, NY: Alyson Books.
   Google Scholar
• Minow, N. (1949). The Illinois proposal to confine sexually dangerous persons. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 40, 186–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrell v. State, 215 S.W.3d 96, 107 ( Mo. 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Johnson, J. T., & Janke, C. (2008). Does interrater (dis)agreement on psychopathy checklist scores in sexually violent predator trials suggest partisan allegiance in forensic evaluations? Law and Human Behavior, 32, 352–362. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9097-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. V., Meeks, M., Woods, C. & Tussey, C. (2009). Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 15, 19–53. doi:10.1037/a0014897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrie, D. C., Cornell, D. G., & McCoy, W. K. (2005). Psychopathy, conduct disorder, and stigma: Does diagnostic labeling influence juvenile probation officer recommendations? Law and Human Behavior, 29, 323–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.D. Cent. Code Ann. § 25-03.3-01 ( West, Westlaw through the 2013 Regular Session of the 63rd Legislative Assembly).
   Google Scholar
• N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 135-E (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Neb. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 71-1201-1209 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2971.01 (West 2013, Westlaw through 2013 Files 24 and 26 to 38 of the 130th GA) (2013-2014).
   Google Scholar
• People v. Superior Court (George), 164 Cal. App. 4th 183, 78 Cal. Rptr. 3d 711 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M. G. (2002). Managing unacceptable risk: Sex offenders, community response, and social policy in the United States and Canada. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 46, 483–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrunik, M. (2003). The hare and the tortoise: Dangerousness and sex offender policy in the United States and Canada. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale, 45, 43–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1997). Cross-validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231–241. doi: 10.1023/A:1024882430242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond v. Lewis, 113 S. Ct. 528 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Rockett, J. L., Murrie, D. C., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2007). Diagnostic labeling in juvenile justice settings: Do psychopathy and conduct disorder findings influence clinicians? Psychological Services, 4, 107–122.
   Google Scholar
• Seling v. Young, 531 U.S. 250 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Serious Sex Offenders (Detention and Supervision) Act 2009 (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Serious Sex Offenders Act 2013 (NT).
   Google Scholar
• Sexual Psychopaths, D.C. Code § 22–3803 ( West, Westlaw through July 29, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Fazel, S., Gueorguieva, R., & Buchanan, A. (2012). Rates of sexual recidivism in high risk sex offenders: A meta-analysis of 10,422 participants. Sex Offender Treatment, 7, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelley, B. (2011). Sex offender assessment panels: A failed attempt to protect the public from Louisiana's most violent predators. Louisiana Law Review, 72, 287–324.
   Google Scholar
• State v. Maurice G., 4 N.Y.S.3d 860 ( N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2015).
   Google Scholar
• State v. Raul. L., 988 N.Y.S.2d 190 ( N.Y. App. Div. 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan v. United States. (2012). EWHC (Admin) 1680, [36](Eng.). Retrieved from http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2012/1680.html
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E. H. (1950). The sexual psychopath laws. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 40, 543–554.
   Google Scholar
• Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 841.023 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Tillman v. Australia (2010). Retrieved on January 21, 2015 from http://hrlc.org.au/tillman-v-australia-un-doc-ccprc98d16352007-12-april-2010/
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Comstock, 560 U.S. 126 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Va. Code Ann. § 37.2-903 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Vognsen, J., & Phenix, A. (2004). Antisocial personality disorder is not enough: A reply to Sreenivasan, Weinberger, and Garrick. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 32, 440–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wash. Rev. Code § 71.09 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Weinrath, M. (2004). Dangerous offender FAQ. Available online at http://www.cbc.ca/news/ viewpoint/vp_weinrath/
   Google Scholar
• Witt, P. H., & Conroy, M. A. (2009). Evaluation of sexually violent predators. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wollert, R. (2006). Low base rates limit expert certainty when current actuarials are used to identify sexually violent predators: An application of Bayes's theorem. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 56–85. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.12.1.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodworth, G. G., & Kadane, J. B. (2004). Expert testimony supporting post-sentence civil incarceration of violent sexual offenders. Law, Probability and Risk, 3(3-4), 221–241. doi:10.1093/lawprj/3.3-4.221
   Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., & Greene, E. (2012). Jurors' use of standards of proof in decisions about punitive damages. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 30, 856–872. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar