Age Differences in the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY)

References

• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartel, P. (2008). Risk for nonviolent delinquency. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Lodewijjs, H., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2010). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). In K. Douglas & R. Otto (Eds.), Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp. 63–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen and S. Long (Eds.), Structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, R. E., & Gretton, H. M. (2003). The predictive validity of risk assessment with violent young offenders a 1-year examination of criminal outcome. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 30(6), 688–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (2004). Changing relationships, changing youth interpersonal contexts of adolescent development. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(1), 55–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, M. C., & Rennie, C. E. (2008). The structured assessment of violence risk in youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder. Psychological Assessment, 20, 35–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., & Ogloff, J. R. (2003). Multiple facets of risk for violence: The impact of judgmental specificity on structured decisions about violence risk. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2, 19–34.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Yeomans, M., & Boer, D. P. (2005). Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 32, 479–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkovitch, N., Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M. J., & Ullman, D. (2008). Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessments instruments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26, 511–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, D. J., Rowe, D. C., & Gulley, B. L. (1993). Impact of pubertal status, timing, and age on adolescent sexual experience and delinquency. Journal of Adolescent Research, 8(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Forth, A. E., & Kosson, D. S. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL-YV). Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Gammelgård, M., Koivisto, A.-M., Eronen, M., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2008). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) among institutionalized adolescents. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19, 352–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 50(8), 991–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrenkohl, T. I., Maguin, E., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Abbott, R. D., & Catalano, R. F. (2000). Developmental risk factors for youth violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26(3), 176–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, R.D. and Andrews, D.A., 2002. Youth Level of Service. Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI): User's Manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. Y. (2013). Testing psychometric properties and the cross-ethnic construct validity of the Risk and Resiliency Checkup. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 11, 165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J., & Johnson, J. D. (2008). Being young and Black: What are their effects on juvenile justice decision making? Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 560–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiber, M. J., Peck, J. H., & Beaudry-Cyr, M. (2014). When does race and gender matter? The interrelationships between the gender of probation officers and juvenile court detention and intake outcomes. Justice Quarterly, (ahead-of-print), 1–28. doi:10.1080/07418825.2014.958185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijks, H. P., Doreleijers, T. A., De Ruiter, C., & Borum, R. (2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 31, 263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luong, D., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). Applying risk/need assessment to probation practice and its impact on the recidivism of young offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 38, 1177–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyle, C. G., & Graham, E. (2000). Looks can be deceiving: Using a risk assessment instrument to evaluate the outcomes of child protection services. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 935–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, M. R., Horn R. A., & Mellott, R. N. (2011). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth in secondary educational settings. Psychological Assessment, 20, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, J. R., & Schmidt, F. (2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violent Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 35, 344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36, 329–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, S. R., Lee, Z., & Moretti, M. M. (2010). Gender differences in risk factors for violence: An examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 390–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz, J., & Garelik-Wyler, R. (1999). Accuracy and confidence in clinical assessment of psychiatric inpatients risk of violence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22, 99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F., Campbell, M. A., & Houlding, C. (2010). Comparative analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV in adolescent offenders: A 10-year follow-up into adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: A meta-analysis. Law & Human Behavior, 31, 449–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S. (2008). A meta-analysis of juvenile justice risk assessment instruments predictive validity by gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(11), 1367–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F., Campbell, M. A., & Houlding, C. (2011). Comparative analyses of the YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL: YV in adolescent offenders: A 10-year follow-up into adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 9(1), 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 2(1), 55–87.
   Google Scholar
• Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Zhang, Q., Van Kammen, W., & Maguin, E. (1993). The double edge of protective and risk factors for delinquency: Interrelations and developmental patterns. Development and Psychopathology, 5(4), 683–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Scalora, M., Cuadra, L., Bader, S., Chavez, V., Ullman, D., & Lawrence, L. (2008). Assessing risk for violence in adolescents who have sexually offended: a comparison of the J-SOAP-II, J-SORRAT-II, and SAVRY. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 35, 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Elkovitch, N., Scalora, M. J., & Ullman, D. (2009). Assessment of reoffense risk in adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Predictive validity of the ERASOR, PCL: YV, YLS/CMI, and Static-99. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 36, 981–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Chapman, J., & Cook, N. E. (2011). Risk-needs assessment in juvenile justice predictive validity of the SAVRY, racial differences, and the contribution of needs factors. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 38(1), 42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012a). Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training. Law & Human Behavior, 36, 225–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Perrault, R. T., Guy, L. S., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012b). Developmental issues in risk assessment: Implications for juvenile justice. Victims & Offenders, 7, 364–384.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, J. L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L., Chattha, H. K., & Meyers, J. R. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15(1), 104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, C. Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar