References
- Fazel, S., & Bjorkly, S. (2016). Methodological considerations in risk assessment research In S. Singh, S. Bjorkly, & S. Fazel (Eds.), International Perspectives on Violence Risk Assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Fazel, S., Chang, Z., Fanshawe, T., Långström, N., Lichtenstein, P., Larsson, H., & Mallett, S. (2016). Prediction of violent reoffending on release from prison: derivation and external validation of a scalable tool. Lancet Psychiatry, 3(6), 535–543. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)00103-6
- Fazel, S., Singh, J. P., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345, e4692.
- Mallett, S., Halligan, S., Thompson, M., Collins, G. S., & Altman, D. G. (2012). Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 345, e3999.
- Pepe, M. S., Kerr, K. F., Longton, G., & Wang, Z. (2013). Testing for improvement in prediction model performance. Statistics in Medicine, 32(9), 1467–1482.
- Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513.
- Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2013). Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e72484. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072484
- Yang, M., Wong, S. C., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: a meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 740–767.