References
- Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
- Cooke, D., & Michie, C. (2013). Violence risk assessment. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing Clinical Risk: A guide to effective practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- Douglas, K. S., & Belfrage, H. (2014). Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the HCR-20 Version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 130–139. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.908429
- Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A., & Hendry, M. (2013). Violence risk assessment and management. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing Clinical Risk: A guide to effective practice. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence (3rd ed.). Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., Belfrage, H., Guy, L. S., & Wilson, C. M. (2014). Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20, Version 3 (HCR-20V3): Development and Overview. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 93–108. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906519
- Doyle, M., Archer-Power, L., Coid, J., Constantinos, K., Ullrich, S., & Shaw, J. (2014). Predicting Post-Discharge Community Violence in England and Wales using the HCR-20 V3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 140–147. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906517
- Dudley, P., Park, I., James, I., & Dodgson, G. (2010). Rate of agreement between clinicians on the content of a cognitive formulation of delusional beliefs: The effect of quantifications and experience. Behavioural and Cognitive Therapy, 38, 185–200.
- Hart, S., Kropp, P., Laws, D., Klaver, J., Logan, C., & Watt, K. (2003). The Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol: Structured professional guidelines for assessing risk of sexual violence. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute. Vancouver, Canada: Simon Fraser University.
- Hart, S., & Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: The structured professional judgement approach, In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic Case Formulation, Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
- Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic Case Formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–126. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
- Johnstone, L. (2013). Working with complex cases: Mental disorder and violence. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing Clinical Risk: A guide to effective practice, Oxford, UK: Routledge.
- Kendjelic, E., & Ells, T. (2007). Generic psychotherapy case formulation training improved formulation quality. Psychotherapy, 44, 66–77. doi:10.1037/0033-3204.44.1.66
- Kuyken, W., Fothergill, M., Musa, C., & Chadwick, P. (2005). The reliability and quality of cognitive case formulation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1187–1201. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.007
- Lewis, G., & Doyle, M. (2009). Risk Formulation: What are we doing and why? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8, 286–292. doi:10.1080/14999011003635696
- Logan, C. (2014). The HCR-20 Version 3: A Case Study in Risk Formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 172–180. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.906516
- McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1996; 1(1), 30–46. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
- McMurran, M., Logan, C., & Hart, S. (2012). Case formulation quality checklist, Unpublished checklist.
- McMurran, M., & Bruford, S. (2016). Case formulation quality checklist: A revision based upon clinicians ' views. Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(1), 31–38. doi:10.1108/JFP-05-2015-0027
- NHS Health Research Authority. (2016). Defining research. Retrieved from http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2016/06/defining-research.pdf.
- Strub, D., Douglas, K., & Nicholls, T. (2014). The Validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment Scheme Amongst Offenders and Civil Psychiatric Patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148–159. doi:10.1080/14999013.2014.911785
- Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic Case Formulation. Chichester, UK. Wiley-Blackwell.
- Weerasekera. (1996). Multiperspective case formulation: A step towards treatment integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
- Webster, C. D., Douglas, K. S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S. D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing the Risk for Violence (Version 2). Vancouver, Canada: Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.