Overcoming Resistance in Clinical and Forensic Interviews

References

• Adams, R. B., Gordon, H. L., Baird, A. A., Ambady, N., & Kleck, R. E. (2003). Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science, 300, 1536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. (1991). Meta-analysis comparing the persuasiveness of one-sided and two-sided messages. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55, 390–404.
   Google Scholar
• Apotheloz, D., & Nowakowska, M. (2011). Deja en emploi justificatif. In G. Corminboeuf & M. J. Beguelin (Eds.), Du système linguistique aux actions langagières (pp. 249–261). Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck-Duculot.
   Google Scholar
• Arkowitz, H. (2002). Toward an integrative perspective on resistance to change. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 219–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S. (2004). Advertising and the science of persuasion. Unpublished manuscript, Wharton School of Business, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, T. H., Yoon, S., & Kim, S. (2015). When environmental messages should be assertive: Examining the moderating role of effort investment. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 135–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutler, L. E., Moleiro, C., & Talebi, H. (2002). Resistance in psychotherapy: What conclusions are supported by research? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(2), 207–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigi, S. (2016). Communication skills for patient engagement: Argumentation competencies as means to prevent or limit reactance arousal, with an example from the Italian healthcare system. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 10.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, J. W. S., & Nott, H. M. R. (1995). Social and communication behaviour of companion dogs. In Serpell, J. (Ed.), The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour, and interactions with people (pp. 115–130). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, L. J. (2001). From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2(2), 177–199.
   Google Scholar
• Brockner, J., Guzzi, B., Kane, J., Levine, E., & Shaplen, K. (1984). Organizational fundraising: Further evidence on the effect of legitimizing small donations. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 611–614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., Borland, R., & Burgoon, M. (1998). Impact of behavioral intention on effectiveness of message features: Evidence from the family sun safety project. Human Communication Research, 24, 433–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J. M. (1986). Increasing compliance by improving the deal: The that's-not-all technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 277–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, B. J. (1998). Effects of warning and information labels on consumption of full-fat, reduced-fat, and no-fat products. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, B. (2006). Effects of warning and information labels on attraction to television violence in viewers of different ages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 2073–2078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catrambone, R., Beike, D., & Niedenthal, P. (1996). Is the self-concept a habitual referent in judgments of similarity? Psychological Science, 7(3), 158–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T. L., Dalton, A. N., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2007). Nonconscious relationship reactance: When significant others prime opposing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 719–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. S., Minson, J. A., Schone, M., & Heinrichs, M. (2013). In the eye of the beholder: Eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2254–2261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. J., Thrasher, J. F., Swayampakala, K., Yong, H.-H., McKeever, R., Hammond, D., … Borland, R. (2016). Does reactance against cigarette warning labels matter? Warning label responses and downstream smoking cessation amongst adult smokers in Australia, Canada, Mexico and the United States. PLoS One, 11(7).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2000). Influence: Science and practice. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., & Schroeder, D. (1976). Increasing compliance by legitimizing paltry contributions: When even a penny helps. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 599–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31(2), 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. S., Mills, J., & Corcoran, D. M. (1989). Keeping track of needs and inputs of friends and strangers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 533–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline, F. W., & Fay, J. (1990). Parenting with love and logic: Teaching children responsibility. Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress.
   Google Scholar
• Coppola, V., & Girandola, F. (2017). When increasing the strength of the argument becomes counterproductive: The role of argumentative markers in the arousal of the psychological reactance. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 1, 22.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B. P., & Knowles, E. S. (1999). A disrupt-then-reframe technique of social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 192–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., & O’Donohue, W. T. (2004). The road to perdition: “Extreme influence” tactics in the interrogation room. In W. T. O’Donohue & E. Levensky (Eds.) Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 897–996). New York: Elsevier Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1991). The current status of research on sequential-request compliance techniques. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(3), 283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (2014). Language, style, and persuasion. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 177–187). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnell, A. J., Thomas, A., & Buboltz, W. C. Jr. (2001). Psychological reactance: Factor structure and internal consistency of the questionnaire for the measurement of psychological reactance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(5), 679–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowd, T. (2002). Resistance in cognitive therapy. In T. Scrimali, & L. Grimaldi (Eds.), Cognitive psychotherapy toward a new millennium: Scientific foundations and clinical practice (pp. 187–189). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, E. T., Wallbrown, F., Sanders, D., & Yesenosky, J. M. (1994). Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 18, 601–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmundson, M. (2010). The death of Sigmund Freud: The legacy of his last days. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, M. H., & Rossi, E. L. (1975). Varieties of double bind. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 17(3), 143–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erickson, M. H., Rossi, E. L., & Rossi, S. (1976). Hypnotic realities: The induction of clinical hypnosis and forums of indirect suggestion. New York: Irvington.
   Google Scholar
• Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15, 330–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fennis, B. M., Das, E. H. H. J., & Pruyn, A. T.H. (2004). If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with nonsense: Extending the impact of the disrupt-then-reframe technique of social influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransen, M. L., Smit, E. G., & Verlegh, P. W. (2015). Strategies and motives for resistance to persuasion: An integrative framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 12.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. (1990). An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 383–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. L. & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1955). Studies on hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 2, pp. 1893–1895, 135–181). London: Hogarth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Furko, P. (2017). Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications, 3, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., Fujita, K., & Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the implementation of goals. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory and application (pp. 211–228). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandpre, J. R., Alvaro, E. M., Burgoon, M., Miller, C. H., & Hall, J. R. (2003). Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication, 15, 349–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, B. (2002). Get with the program: Getting real about your weight, health, and emotional well-being. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Strange, J. J., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.). (2002). Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gueguen, N., & Pascual, A. (2000). Evocation of freedom and compliance: The but you are free of … technique. Current Research in Social Psychology, 5(18), 264–269.
   Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(2), 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and prevention as a motivational duality: Implications for evaluative processes. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 503–525). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• HimmatPatil, V. (2006). Appeals with negative emotions and strategies to reduce resistance to persuasion: An application in the context of charitable solicitations (Ph.D.). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Global. (305319480).
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M., & Faedda, S. (1996). Refinement of the Hong psychological reactance scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56(1), 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S.-M., & Ostini, R. (1989). Further evaluation of Merz's psychological reactance scale. Psychological Reports, 64, 707–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacks, J. Z., & O'Brien, M. E. (2004). Decreasing resistance by affirming the self. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 235–257). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvella, R. J., & Lundquist, R. (1994). Scales in the interpretation of words, sentences, and texts. Journal of Semantics, 11, 171–198.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvella, R. J., & Mathieu, S. (2000). On judging quantities in text without expert knowledge. In R. Lundquist & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), Language, text and knowledge (pp. 261–284). New York, NY: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Jolson, M. A. (1997). Broadening the scope of relationship selling. Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, 17, 75–88
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, E., Graupmann, V. N., Kayser, D., Zanna, M., Traut-Mattausch, E., & Frey, D. (2009). Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a “universal” freedom? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(5), 1068–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalski, J., Lentz, L., Sanders, T., & Zwaan, R., A. (2008). The forewarning effect of coherence markers in persuasive discourse: Evidence from persuasion and processing. Discourse Processes, 45(6), 545–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, S. J., Byrne, S., & Kent, A. I. (2016). Mitigating the perception of threat to freedom through abstraction and distance. Communications Research, 1, 24.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, E., & Creyer, E. H. (2007). Increasing persuasion, reducing resistance: Maximizing the efficacy of persuasive appeals for aesthetic product consumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 337–339.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Levine, T., & Allen, M. (2013). Comparing separate process and intertwined models for reactance. Communication Studies, 64(3), 273.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 78–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (2004). Approach-avoidance model of persuasion: Alpha and omega strategies for change. In E. S. Knowles, & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and Persuasion (pp. 117–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. S., & Riner, D. D. (2007). Omega approaches to persuasion: Overcoming resistance. In A. R. Pratkanis (Ed.), The science of social influence (pp. 83–114). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76, 95–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVoie, N. R., Quick, B. L., Riles, J. M., & Lambert, N. J. (2015). Are graphic cigarette warning labels an effective message strategy? A test of psychological reactance theory and source appraisal. Communication Research, 1, 21.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988). How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 374–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey, L. L. M. (2005). Anticipated guilt as behavioral motivation: An examination of appeals to help unknown others through bone marrow donation. Human Communication Research, 31, 453–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, J. A., & Knowles, E. S. (2002, May). Acknowledging target resistance in persuasive messages. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, N., & Haworth, K. (2016). Developing a linguistically informed approach to police interviewing. In R. Lawson, & D. Sayers (Eds.), Sociolinguistic research: Application and impact (pp. 151–170). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merz, J. (1983). Fragebogen zur Messung der Psychologischen Reaktanz [Questionnaire for Measuring Psychological Reactance. ]. Diagonistica, 29, 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, S. B. (2002). A psychodynamic perspective on resistance in psychotherapy: Viva la resistance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, L. A. (1996). On the use and meaning of already. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 477–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H. (2015). Persuasion and psychological reactance: The effects of explicit, high-controlling language. In: Schulze R., Pishwa H. (eds). The exercise of power in communication (p. 269–286). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miron, A. M., & Brehm, J. W. (2006). Reactance theory – 40 years later. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 37, 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mussweiler, T. (2002). The malleability of anchoring effects. Experimental Psychology, 49(1), 67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro, J. (2008). What every body is saying. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, C. A. (2002). A cognitive perspective on resistance in psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesterkin, D. A. (2013). Organizational change and psychological reactance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(3), 573–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perls, F., Hefferline, R., & Goodman, P. (1951). Gestalt therapy: Excitement and growth in the human personality. New York: Julian.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 37-72). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27, 1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., & Considine, J. R. (2008). Examining the use of forceful language when designing exercise persuasive messages for adults: A test of conceptualizing reactance arousal as a two-step process. Health Communication, 23, 483–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2013). Reactance theory and persuasion. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 167–183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modeled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2008). Examining the role of trait reactance and sensation seeking on perceived threat, state reactance, and reactance restoration. Human Communication Research, 34, 448–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, C. E. (1996). The concept of resistance in self psychology. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 50(1), 66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagarin, B. J., Britt, M. A., Heider, J. D., Wood, S. E., & Lynch, J. E. (2003). Bartering Our Attention: The Distraction and Persuasion Effects of On-Line Advertisements. Cognitive Technology, 8(2), 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, M. D., Leve, C., & Pratkanis, A. R. (1994). Hey buddy, can you spare seventeen cents? Mindful persuasion and the pique technique. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24(9), 755–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel, J., Arndt, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2001). Being accepted for who we are: Evidence that social validation of the intrinsic self reduces general defensiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 35–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segrin, C. (1993). The effects of nonverbal behavior on outcomes of compliance gaining attempts. Communication Studies, 44, 169–187.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L. (2014). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and choice. Health Communication, 30, 975–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Bigsby, E. (2013). The effects of message features: Content, structure and style. In J. P. Dillard, & L. Shen (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 20–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, S. J., Crawford, M. T., & McConnell, A. R. (2004). Looking ahead as a technique to reduce resistance to persuasive attempts. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 149–174). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shoham, V., Trost, S. E., & Rohrbaugh, M. J. (2004). From state to trait and back again: Reactance theory goes clinical. In R. A. Wright, J. Greenberg, and S. S. Brehm (Eds.), Motivational analyses of social behavior: Building on Jack Brehm's contributions to psychology (pp. 167–185). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Seibel, C. A., & Dowd, E. T. (2001). Personality characteristics associated with psychological reactance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 963–969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sittenthaler, S., Jonas, E., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2016). Explaining self and vicarious reactance: A process model approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(4), 458–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sittenthaler, S., Traut-Mattausch, E., Steindl, C., & Jonas, E. (2015). Salzburger State Reactance Scale (SSR Scale): Validation of a scale measuring state reactance. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 223(4), 257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoeck-Henkemans, F. (2010). “Anyway”. And “Even” as indicators of complex argumentation. Cogency: Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, 2, 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. K., & Byers, P. Y. (1987). Factorial validity of Merz's psychological reactance scale. Psychological Reports, 61, 811–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gerrevink, R., & de Hoop, H. (2007). On the optimal use of almost and barely in argumentation. In M. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 229–235). Amsterdam, Netherlands: ILLC, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., Fisher, R. P., Kassin, S. M., Morgan, C. A. III, & Kleinman, S. M. (2017). Psychological perspectives on interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 927–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton, S. (1992). Sam Walton: Made in America. New York: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H. S., Howland, M., & Mann, T. (2015). Effects of subtle and explicit health messages on food choice. Health Psychology, 34, 79–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D. M. (1989). White bears and other unwanted thoughts: Suppression, obsession and the psychology of mental control. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman, J. A., & Geers, A. L. (2009). Rebel without a (conscious) cause: Priming a nonconscious goal for psychological reactance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, C. M., Stoll, R., Birch, P., & White, P. H. (2002). Clinical validation and cognitive elaboration: Signs that encourage sustained recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(3), 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicklund, R. A. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. D., & Dolnik, L. (2001). Revealing the worst first: Stealing thunder as a social influence strategy. In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 213–231). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, P. L., Sagarin, B. J., Rhoads, K., Barrett, D. W., & Cialdini, R. B. (2000). Choosing to encourage or discourage: Perceived effectiveness of prescriptive versus proscriptive messages. Environmental Management, 26(6), 589–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterstein, G., & Schaden, G. (2011). Relevance and utility in an argumentative framework: An application to the accommodation of discourse topics. In A. Lecomte & S. Troncon (Eds.), Ludics, dialogue and interactions (pp. 134–146). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S., & Montgomery, D. A. (1977). Effects of inadmissible evidence and level of judicial admonishment to disregard on the judgments of mock juries. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7, 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perceptions of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar