804
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Integrating Neuroscience in Criminal Law: The Dutch Situation as an Example

, , &

References

  • Bijlsma, J., & Meynen, G. (2017). Heeft ons strafrecht de ‘verminderde’ toerekeningsvatbaarheid wel nodig? NJB, 262, 304–310.
  • Buckholtz, J. W., & Faigman, D. L. (2014). Promises, promises for neuroscience and law. Current Biology, 18, 861–867.
  • Buruma, Y. (2008). Over biologie, technologie en strafrecht [On biology, technology and criminal law]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 89–98.
  • Buruma, Y. (2011). Technologie en strafrecht [Technology and criminal law]. In T. I. Oei & G. Meynen (Eds.), Toerekeningsvatbaarheid. Over Vrije Wil, Wetenschap & Recht [Accountability. On Free Will, Science and Law]. Nijmegen: Wolf legal publishers, 43–56.
  • Buruma, Y. (2013). Recht en neurowetenschappen [Law and neurosciences]. NJB, 3129.
  • Brazil, I. A., van Dongen, J. D. M., Maes, J. H. R., Mars, R. B., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2016). Classification and treatment of antisocial individuals. From behavior to biocognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 259–277.
  • De Jong, F. (2013). Wilsvrijheid en strafrechtelijke verantwoordelijkheid. Een rondgang langs fysicalisme, connectionisme en belichaamde cognitie [Free will and criminal responsibility. On physicalism, connectionism and embodied cognition]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 10–39.
  • De Kogel, K., & Westgeest, L. (2015). Neuroscientific and behavioral genetic information in criminal cases in The Netherlands. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 580–605.
  • De Roos, J. R. B. (1900). De Strafmiddelen in de Nieuwere Strafrechtswetenschap [Measures of punishment in the new criminal law doctrine]. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema.
  • De Vogel, V. (2005). Structured Risk Assessment of (sexual) Violence in Forensic Clinical Practice. The HCR-20 and SVR-20 in Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
  • Edersheim, J., Brendel, R., & Price, B. (2012). Neuroimaging, diminished capacity and mitigation. In J.R. Simpson. (Ed.), Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 163–193.
  • Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2014). Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(1), 54–63.
  • Gordon, N. S., & Fondacaro, M. R. (2018). Rethinking the voluntary act requirement:Implications from neuroscience and behavioralscience research. Behav Sci Law, 36, 1–11.
  • Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775–1785.
  • Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2006). Snakes in Suits. When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Regan Books.
  • Hart, H. L. A. (2007). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Haseleger, W. F. G., Leoné, F., & Van Toor, D. A. G. (2013). Data en interpretaties in de cognitieve neurowetenschap [Data and interpretation in cognitive neuroscience]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 78–88.
  • Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (2007). Hersenscans in de rechtszaal. Oppassen geblazen! [Brain images in the courtroom. Take care!]. NJB, 44, 2794–2800.
  • Kandel, E. R. (2008). Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and the New Biology of Mind. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
  • Keiler, J., & Roef, D. (2015). Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law. Cambridge: Intersentia.
  • KNAW (2011). De Nederlandse Wetenschapsagenda 2011. Amsterdam: KNAW.
  • Koenigs, M., Baskin-Sommers, A., Zeier, J., & Newman, J. P. (2011). Investigating the neural correlates of psychopathy: a critical review. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(8), 792–799.
  • Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Control, free will and other humbug. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/record/1/306554.
  • Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566.
  • Libet, B. (1993). Neurophysiology of Consciousness. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
  • Libet, B., Gleason, C., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (Readiness-Potential). the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain A Journal of Neurology, 106(3), 623–642.
  • Mackor, A. R. (2010). Strafrecht en neurowetenschappen. Hoop, huiver of hype? [Criminal law and neurosciences. Hope, hesitance or hype?]. Rechtsfilos Rechtstheorie, 1, 3–8.
  • Meynen, G. (2014). Neurolaw: neuroscience, ethics, and law. review essay. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(4), 819–829.
  • Meynen, G. (2016). Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 41(1), 3–5.
  • Palermo, G. B. (2010). Severe Personality-Disordered Defendants and the Insanity Defense in the United States. A Proposal for Change. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
  • Pardo, M. S., & Patterson, D. (2010). Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Ill Law Review, 4, 1211–1250.
  • Ponseti, J., Granert, O., & Jansen, O. (2012). Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(2), 187–194.
  • Rassin, E. C. (2012). Hersenen in het strafrecht. Expertise en Recht, 3, 120–125.
  • Roef, D. (2013). Welke vrije wil heeft het strafrecht nodig? Over bewustzijn, brein en capaciteitsverantwoordelijkheid [What type of free will is required by the criminal law system? on consciousness, brain and capacity responsibility]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 40–53.
  • Roskies, A. (2006). Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9), 419–423.
  • Schleim, S., & Rosier, J. P. (2009). fMRI in translation: The challenges of real world applications. Front Hum Neurosci, 3, 1–7.
  • Sie, M., & Wouters, A. (2010). The BCN challenge to compatibilist free will and personal responsibility. Neuroethics, 3(2), 121–133.
  • Strawson, P. F. (2008). Freedom and resentment and other essays. London/New York: Routledge.
  • Van der Landen, D. (1992). Straf En Maatregel: Een Onderzoek Naar Het Onderscheid Tussen Straf En Maatregel in Het Strafrecht [Punishment or measure? An inquiry into the difference between punishment and measure in the criminal law system]. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.
  • Van der Meer, T. (2008). Eugenic and sexual folklores and the castration of sex offenders in the Netherlands (1938–1968). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39(2), 195–204.
  • Van der Wolf, M. J. F. (2006). Onbehandelbaar! Onbillijk? Verkenningen Omtrent “behandelbaarheid” Als Criterium Voor TBS [Untreatable, inequitable? Explorations concerning "treatability" as a criterium for the tbs-order]. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
  • Van der Wolf, M. J. F. (2012). TBS - Veroordeeld Tot Voorordeel. Een Visie Na Analyse van Historische Fundamenten van Recente Knelpunten, Het Systeem En Buitenlandse Alternatieven [TBS. Convicted to preconviction. A view after analysis of historical bases of recent issues, the system and foreign alternatives]. Nijmegen: Wolf legal publishers.
  • Van Hamel, G. A. (1906). Zijn in de Wetgeving bijzondere maatregelen te verordenen ten aanzien van personen die strafbare feiten begaan en zich bevinden op de grens van krankzinnigheid en geestelijke gezondheid (z.g.n. grensgevallen, minderwaardigen, minder toerekenbaren)? [Does the legislation provide specific measures for those who are at the interface of insanity and a sound mind?]. Handel Der Ned Juristenvereeniging, 36, 199–240.
  • Van Hamel, J. A. (1912). Het onwenschelijke van eene Psychopathen-strafwet [the undisirable of a psychopath criminal code. Tijdschrift Voor Strafrecht, 13, 149–190.
  • Van Marle, H. J. C. (2009). Het neuronaturalisme en de forensische psychiatrische rapportage [Neuronaturalism and the forensic psychiatric expert evidence]. In F. Koenraadt & I. Weijers (Eds.), Vrijheid En Verlangen. Liber Amicorum Prof. Dr. Antoine Mooij [Freedom and desire. Liber Amicorum Prof. Dr. Antoine Mooij] (pp. 257–272). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
  • Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will. Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49–54.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.