Integrating Neuroscience in Criminal Law: The Dutch Situation as an Example

References

• Bijlsma, J., & Meynen, G. (2017). Heeft ons strafrecht de ‘verminderde’ toerekeningsvatbaarheid wel nodig? NJB, 262, 304–310.
   Google Scholar
• Buckholtz, J. W., & Faigman, D. L. (2014). Promises, promises for neuroscience and law. Current Biology, 18, 861–867.
   Google Scholar
• Buruma, Y. (2008). Over biologie, technologie en strafrecht [On biology, technology and criminal law]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Buruma, Y. (2011). Technologie en strafrecht [Technology and criminal law]. In T. I. Oei & G. Meynen (Eds.), Toerekeningsvatbaarheid. Over Vrije Wil, Wetenschap & Recht [Accountability. On Free Will, Science and Law]. Nijmegen: Wolf legal publishers, 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Buruma, Y. (2013). Recht en neurowetenschappen [Law and neurosciences]. NJB, 3129.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil, I. A., van Dongen, J. D. M., Maes, J. H. R., Mars, R. B., & Baskin-Sommers, A. R. (2016). Classification and treatment of antisocial individuals. From behavior to biocognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 91, 259–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, F. (2013). Wilsvrijheid en strafrechtelijke verantwoordelijkheid. Een rondgang langs fysicalisme, connectionisme en belichaamde cognitie [Free will and criminal responsibility. On physicalism, connectionism and embodied cognition]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 10–39.
   Google Scholar
• De Kogel, K., & Westgeest, L. (2015). Neuroscientific and behavioral genetic information in criminal cases in The Netherlands. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 580–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Roos, J. R. B. (1900). De Strafmiddelen in de Nieuwere Strafrechtswetenschap [Measures of punishment in the new criminal law doctrine]. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema.
   Google Scholar
• De Vogel, V. (2005). Structured Risk Assessment of (sexual) Violence in Forensic Clinical Practice. The HCR-20 and SVR-20 in Dutch Forensic Psychiatric Patients. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edersheim, J., Brendel, R., & Price, B. (2012). Neuroimaging, diminished capacity and mitigation. In J.R. Simpson. (Ed.), Neuroimaging in Forensic Psychiatry: From the Clinic to the Courtroom, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 163–193.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, A. L., & Raine, A. (2014). Neurocriminology: implications for the punishment, prediction and prevention of criminal behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(1), 54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, N. S., & Fondacaro, M. R. (2018). Rethinking the voluntary act requirement:Implications from neuroscience and behavioralscience research. Behav Sci Law, 36, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2004). For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1451), 1775–1785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R. D., & Babiak, P. (2006). Snakes in Suits. When Psychopaths Go to Work. New York: Regan Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L. A. (2007). Punishment and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haseleger, W. F. G., Leoné, F., & Van Toor, D. A. G. (2013). Data en interpretaties in de cognitieve neurowetenschap [Data and interpretation in cognitive neuroscience]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 78–88.
   Google Scholar
• Jelicic, M., & Merckelbach, H. L. G. J. (2007). Hersenscans in de rechtszaal. Oppassen geblazen! [Brain images in the courtroom. Take care!]. NJB, 44, 2794–2800.
   Google Scholar
• Kandel, E. R. (2008). Psychiatry, Psychoanalysis, and the New Biology of Mind. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keiler, J., & Roef, D. (2015). Comparative Concepts of Criminal Law. Cambridge: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• KNAW (2011). De Nederlandse Wetenschapsagenda 2011. Amsterdam: KNAW.
   Google Scholar
• Koenigs, M., Baskin-Sommers, A., Zeier, J., & Newman, J. P. (2011). Investigating the neural correlates of psychopathy: a critical review. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(8), 792–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamme, V. A. F. (2008). Control, free will and other humbug. Retrieved from http://dare.uva.nl/record/1/306554.
   Google Scholar
• Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(4), 529–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libet, B. (1993). Neurophysiology of Consciousness. Boston, MA: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Libet, B., Gleason, C., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (Readiness-Potential). the unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain A Journal of Neurology, 106(3), 623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackor, A. R. (2010). Strafrecht en neurowetenschappen. Hoop, huiver of hype? [Criminal law and neurosciences. Hope, hesitance or hype?]. Rechtsfilos Rechtstheorie, 1, 3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. (2014). Neurolaw: neuroscience, ethics, and law. review essay. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(4), 819–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meynen, G. (2016). Neurolaw: recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience, 41(1), 3–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo, G. B. (2010). Severe Personality-Disordered Defendants and the Insanity Defense in the United States. A Proposal for Change. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo, M. S., & Patterson, D. (2010). Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Ill Law Review, 4, 1211–1250.
   Google Scholar
• Ponseti, J., Granert, O., & Jansen, O. (2012). Assessment of pedophilia using hemodynamic brain response to sexual stimuli. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(2), 187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassin, E. C. (2012). Hersenen in het strafrecht. Expertise en Recht, 3, 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Roef, D. (2013). Welke vrije wil heeft het strafrecht nodig? Over bewustzijn, brein en capaciteitsverantwoordelijkheid [What type of free will is required by the criminal law system? on consciousness, brain and capacity responsibility]. Justitiële Verkenningen, 1, 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Roskies, A. (2006). Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9), 419–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleim, S., & Rosier, J. P. (2009). fMRI in translation: The challenges of real world applications. Front Hum Neurosci, 3, 1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sie, M., & Wouters, A. (2010). The BCN challenge to compatibilist free will and personal responsibility. Neuroethics, 3(2), 121–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strawson, P. F. (2008). Freedom and resentment and other essays. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Landen, D. (1992). Straf En Maatregel: Een Onderzoek Naar Het Onderscheid Tussen Straf En Maatregel in Het Strafrecht [Punishment or measure? An inquiry into the difference between punishment and measure in the criminal law system]. Arnhem: Gouda Quint.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, T. (2008). Eugenic and sexual folklores and the castration of sex offenders in the Netherlands (1938–1968). Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 39(2), 195–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Wolf, M. J. F. (2006). Onbehandelbaar! Onbillijk? Verkenningen Omtrent “behandelbaarheid” Als Criterium Voor TBS [Untreatable, inequitable? Explorations concerning "treatability" as a criterium for the tbs-order]. Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wolf, M. J. F. (2012). TBS - Veroordeeld Tot Voorordeel. Een Visie Na Analyse van Historische Fundamenten van Recente Knelpunten, Het Systeem En Buitenlandse Alternatieven [TBS. Convicted to preconviction. A view after analysis of historical bases of recent issues, the system and foreign alternatives]. Nijmegen: Wolf legal publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hamel, G. A. (1906). Zijn in de Wetgeving bijzondere maatregelen te verordenen ten aanzien van personen die strafbare feiten begaan en zich bevinden op de grens van krankzinnigheid en geestelijke gezondheid (z.g.n. grensgevallen, minderwaardigen, minder toerekenbaren)? [Does the legislation provide specific measures for those who are at the interface of insanity and a sound mind?]. Handel Der Ned Juristenvereeniging, 36, 199–240.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hamel, J. A. (1912). Het onwenschelijke van eene Psychopathen-strafwet [the undisirable of a psychopath criminal code. Tijdschrift Voor Strafrecht, 13, 149–190.
   Google Scholar
• Van Marle, H. J. C. (2009). Het neuronaturalisme en de forensische psychiatrische rapportage [Neuronaturalism and the forensic psychiatric expert evidence]. In F. Koenraadt & I. Weijers (Eds.), Vrijheid En Verlangen. Liber Amicorum Prof. Dr. Antoine Mooij [Freedom and desire. Liber Amicorum Prof. Dr. Antoine Mooij] (pp. 257–272). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Vohs, K. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will. Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19(1), 49–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar