Interviewing in Criminal and Intelligence-Gathering Contexts: Applying Science

References

• Abbe, A., & Brandon, S. E. (2014). Building and maintaining rapport in investigative interviews. Police Practice and Research, 15(3), 207–220. doi:10.1080/15614263.2013.827835
   Google Scholar
• Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., & Christiansen, P. (2013). Why tough tactics fail and rapport gets results: Observing rapport-based interpersonal techniques (ORBIT) to generate useful information from terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 19(4), 411–431. doi:10.1037/a0034564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., Waring, S., & Christiansen, P. (2014a). The efficacy of rapport-based techniques for minimizing counter-interrogation tactics amongst a field sample of terrorists. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20(4), 421–430. doi:10.1037/law0000021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alison, L. J., Alison, E., Noone, G., Elntib, S., Waring, S., & Christiansen, P. (2014b). Whatever you say, say nothing: Individual differences in counterinterrogaton tactics amongst a field sample of right wing, AQ inspired and paramilitary terrorists. Personality and Individual Differences, 68, 170–175. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgmental accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 201–271. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(00)80006-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(2), 181–256. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aune, R. K., & Waters, L. L. (1994). Cultural differences in deception: Motivations to deceive in Samoans and North Americans. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(2), 159–172. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgements. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 214–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, S., Arthur, J., Ray, D., Meissner, C., Russano, M., Wells, S. & Kleinman, S. (2018). Enhancing Practise Through Science. Manuscript submitted for Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, S. E., Wells, S., & Seale, C. (2017). Science-based interviewing: Information elicitation. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15, 133–148. doi:10.1002/jip.1496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R., & Milne, B. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In G. D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 181–196). Medford MA: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. L., Arkowitz, H., & Menchola, M. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(5), 843–861. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., & Griffitt, W. (1966). Similarity versus liking: A clarification. Psychonomic Science, 6(6), 295–296.
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, J. (2014). Priming, replication, and the hardest science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 40–48. doi:10.1177/1745691613513470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaikin, A. L., Derlega, V. J., & Miller, S. J. (1976). Effects of room environment on self-disclosure in a counseling analogue. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23(5), 479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2007). The Psychology of Persuasion. New York: Collins Business Essentials.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2016). Pre-suasion: A revolutionary way to influence and persuade. New York, NK: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harvard Business Review, 79, 72–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. B. (2004). The science of persuasion. Scientific American Mind, 14, 70–77. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24939368
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., Ginet, M., Wright, D., Demarchi, S., & Sadler, C. (2013). Back to the real: Efficacy and perception of a modified cognitive interview in the field. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 574–583. doi:10.1002/acp.2942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dando, C., Wilcock, R., Milne, R., & Henry, L. (2009). A modified cognitive interview protocol for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 698–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. R., McMahon, M., & Greenwood, K. M. (2005). The efficacy of mnemonic components of the cognitive interview: Towards a shortened variant for time‐critical investigations. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 75–93. doi:10.1002/acp.1048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D., Villalobos, J. G., Soref, A., & Mikulincer, M. (2016). Priming states of mind can affect disclosure of threatening self-information: Effects of self-affirmation, mortality salience, and attachment orientations. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 351–361. doi:10.1037/lhb0000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., & Brimbal, L. (2015). Interviewing to elicit information: Using priming to promote disclosure. Law and Human Behavior, 39(5), 443–450. doi:10.1037/lhb0000136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, E., Hartwig, M., Brimbal, L., & Denisenkov, P. (2017). A room with a view: Setting influences information disclosure in investigative interviews. Law and Human Behavior, 41(4), 333. doi:10.1037/lhb0000244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1251829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A., & Roberto, A. J. (1996). An empirical examination of three models of integrative and distributive bargaining. International Journal of Conflict Management, 7(3), 209–229. doi:10.1108/eb022782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagley, A., & Chaikin, S. (1975). An attributional analysis of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 136–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3), 288–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-Enhancing Techniques in Investigative Interviewing: The Cognitive Interview. Springfield IL: C.C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., & Geiselman, R. E. (2010). The cognitive interview method of conducting police interviews: Eliciting extensive information and promoting therapeutic jurisprudence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(5–6), 321–328. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Geiselman, R. E., Raymond, D. S., & Jurkevich, L. M. (1987). Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview. Journal of Police Science & Administration, 15, 291–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R. P., Milne, R., & Bull, R. (2011). Interviewing cooperative witnesses. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 16–19. doi:10.1177/0963721410396826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social Beings. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Geiselman, R. E. (2012). The cognitive interview for suspects (CIS). American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 30, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Geraerts, E., Bernstein, D. M., Merckelbach, H., Linders, C., Raymaekers, L., & Loftus, E. F. (2008). Lasting beliefs and their behavioral consequences. Psychological Science, 19(8), 749–753. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02151.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giebels, E., & Taylor, P. J. (2009). Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations: Persuasive arguments and cultural differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 5–19. doi:10.1111/j.1571-9979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332–346. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1261–1267. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.8.1261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Martschuk, N., & Dhami, M. K. (2014). Interviewing high values detainees: Securing cooperation and reliable disclosures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 883–897. doi:10.1002/acp.3087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhag, P. A., Clemens, F., & Strömwall, L. A. (2009). The usual and the unusual suspects: Level of suspicion and counter-interrogation tactics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 6(2), 129–137. doi:10.1002/jip.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grecco, E., Robbins, S. J., Bartoli, E., & Wolff, E. F. (2013). Use of nonconscious priming to promote self-disclosure. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(3), 311–315. doi:10.1177/2167702612472176
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of Interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., & Petursson, H. (1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality? Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 295–306. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(91)90116-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J., & Einarsson, E. (2004). The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10(2), 125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., & Strömwall, L. A. (2007). Guilty and innocent suspects’ strategies during police interrogations. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13(2), 213–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Doering, N. (2010). Impression and information management: On the strategic self-regulation of innocent and guilty suspects. The Open Criminology Journal, 3(1), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Luke, T., & Skerker, M. (2015). Ethical perspectives on interrogation: An analysis of contemporary techniques. In J. Jacobs & J. Jackson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of criminal justice ethics (pp. 326–347). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M., Meissner, C. A., & Semel, M. D. (2014). Human intelligence interviewing and interrogation: Assessing the challenges of developing an ethical, evidence-based approach. In R. Bull (Ed.), Investigative Interviewing (pp. 209–228). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–135. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, R. J. (1999). Psychology of intelligence analysis. Center for the Study of Intelligence. Berkshire, UK: Books Express Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• HIG Report (2016). Interrogation: A review of the science. High-value detainee interrogation group, Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/file-repository/hig-report-interrogation-a-review-of-the-science-september-2016.pdf/view,
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. doi:10.1007/s10608-013-9595-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg, U., & Christianson, S. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20(1–2), 31–45. doi:10.1002/bsl.470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(5), 799–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.3.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M. (2006). A critical appraisal of modern police interrogations. Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 207–227). Collompton Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, M., Appleby, S. C., & Perillo, J. T. (2010). Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(1), 39–55. doi:10.1348/135532509X449361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassin, S. M., & Norwick, R. J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 211–221. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022323.74584.f5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M., Hurren, E. J., & Mazerolle, P. (2006). Sex offenders’ perceptions of how they were interviewed. Canadian Journal of Police & Security Services, 4, 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., & Redlich, D. (2016). The dynamic nature of interrogations. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 295–309. doi:10.1037/lhb0000172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatzky, R. L., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). An intersensory interaction account of priming effects – and their absence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 49–58. doi:10.1177/1745691613513468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1999). The cognitive interview: A meta-analysis. Psychology, Crime & Law, 5(1–2), 3–27. doi:10.1080/10683169908414991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowles, E. S., & Linn, J. A. (Eds.). (2004). Resistance and persuasion. Psychology Press: Church Rd, Hove, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A. (1992). From coercion to deception: The changing nature of police interrogation in America. Crime, Law and Social Change, 18, 35–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leo, R. A., & Ofshe, R. J. (1998). Consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 88(2), 429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Palmer, J. C. (1974). Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13(5), 585–589.
   Google Scholar
• Logan, C. (2013). Risk assessment: Specialist interviewing skills for forensic practitioners. In C. Logan and L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk:A guide to effective practice. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, T. C., & Ferguson, M. J. (2015). Can we undo our first impressions? The role of reinterpretation in reversing implicit evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 823–849. doi:10.1037/pspa0000021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, S., Vrij, A., Shaw, D., Leal, S., Ewen, S., Hillman, J., Granhag, P. & Fisher, R. (2013). Two heads are better than one? How to effectively use two interviewers to elicit cues to deception. Legal & Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 324–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meissner, C., Russano, M., & Narchet, F. (2010). The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence. Police interrogations and false confessions (pp. 111–126). Washington DC: American Psychological Association. 10.1037/12085-007.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, C. A., Surmon-Böhr, F., Oleszkiewicz, S., & Alison, L. J. (2017). Developing an evidence-based perspective on interrogation: A review of the US government’s high-value detainee interrogation group research program. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(4), 438. 10.1037/law0000136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Reppucci, N. (2007). Police practices and perceptions regarding juvenile interrogation and interrogative suggestibility. Behavioural Science and The Law, 25(6), 757–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, B. & Bull, R. (Eds.) (1999). Investigative interviewing: Psychology and practice. Wiley series in psychology of crime, policing & law. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2011). Intelligence analysis for tomorrow: Advances from the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contribution of majority and minority influence processes. Psychological Review, 93(1), 20–23. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.1.23
   Google Scholar
• Ofshe, R. J., & Leo, R. A. (1997). The social psychology of police interrogation: The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law Politics and Society, 16, 189–254.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, T. C., Barrett, E. C., & Taylor, P. J. (2005). Investigative sense-making in criminal contexts. In J.M. Schraagen, L.G. Militello, T. Ormerod, and R. Lipshitz (Eds.), Naturalistic decision making and macrocognition (pp. 81–102). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, T. C., & Dando, C. J. (2015). Finding a needle in a haystack: Toward a psychologically informed method for aviation security screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 76–84. doi:10.1037/xge0000030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxburgh, G., & Ost, J. (2011). The use and efficacy of empathy in police interviews with suspects of sexual offences. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 8(2), 178–188. doi:10.1002/jip.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palena, N., Caso, L., Vrij, A., & Orthey, R. (2018). Detecting deception through small talk and comparable truth baselines. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 15(2), 124–132. doi:10.1002/jip.1495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo, R. M., Albuquerque, P. B., & Bull, R. (2013). The enhanced cognitive interview: Towards a better use and understanding of this procedure. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 15(3), 190–199.
   Google Scholar
• Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Rutter, S. (1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, B. J., McMillen, J. C., Proctor, E. K., Carpenter, C. R., Griffey, R. T., Bunger, A. C., … York, J. L. (2012). A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Medical Care Research and Review, 69(2), 123–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Jones, T. S. (1982). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monographs, 49(3), 171–191. doi:10.1080/03637758209376080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. H., Taylor, P. J., Snook, B., Conchie, S. M., & Bennell, C. (2014). Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. doi:10.1037/lhb0000077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Meissner, C. A., & Atkinson, D. (2017). Training state and local law enforcement on science-based interrogation approaches: A training assessment and field validation study. HIG Researcher Day, Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Russano, M., Meissner, C., & Atkinson, D. (2018). Training science-based methods of interrogation to state and local law enforcement officers: A training evaluation and field validation study. Paper presented at the American Psychology Law Society, Atlanta GA.
   Google Scholar
• Russano, M. B., Narchet, F. M., Kleinman, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Structured interviews of experienced HUMINT interrogators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(6), 847–859. doi:10.1002/acp.3069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiter, J. S., & Bruschke, J. (2007). Deception and emotion: The effects of motivation, relationship type, and sex on expected feelings of guilt and shame following acts of deception in United States and Chinese samples. Communication Studies, 58(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/10510970601168624
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, E., & Griffiths, A. (2013). Investigative interviewing: The conversation management approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skerker, M. (2010). An ethics of interrogation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 203–220. doi:10.3758/BF03196157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano-Flores, G., & Li, M. (2009). Generalizability of cognitive interview‐based measures across cultural groups. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28, 9–18. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00143.x
   Google Scholar
• SSCI Report (2014). Senate select committee on intelligence, committee study of the central intelligence agency’s interrogation and detention program. Retrieved from http://www.intelligence.senate.cog/study2014/sscistudy1.pdf, accessed 29 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stearns, G., & Marcia, T. (2014). personal communication). Tape-recorded interview of Gabriel Campos-Martinez. Los Angeles Police Department, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime and Law, 9(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/10683160308138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Yves, M., & Meissner, C. A. (2014). Interviewing suspects. In M. St-Yves (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: The essentials (pp. 145–190). Toronto CA: Thomson Reuters Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Swenson, R. (2006). Educing information: Interrogation: Science and art, intelligence science board, phase 1 report. Washington DC: National Intelligence University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. (2002). A cylindrical model of communication behavior in crisis negotiations. Human Communication Research, 28(1), 7–48. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J. (2014). The role of language in conflict and conflict resolution. In T. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 459–470). Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., & Donohue, W. A. (2006). Hostage negotiation opens up. In P. J. Taylor & W. A. Donohue (Eds.), The negotiator’s handbook (pp. 667–674). Chicago: American Bar Association.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. J., Larner, S., Conchie, S. M., & Menacere, T. (2017). Culture moderates changes in linguistic self-presentation and detail provision when deceiving others. Royal Society Open Science, 4(6), 170128. doi:10.1098/rsos.170128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallano, J. P., Evans, J. R., Schreiber-Compo, N. S., & Kieckhaefer, J. M. (2015). Rapport-building during witness and suspect interviews: A survey of law enforcement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(3), 369–380. doi:10.1002/acp.3115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting Lies and Deceit. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A. (2016). Baselining as a lie detection method. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 1112–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Leal, S., Mann, S., Dalton, G., Jo, E., Shaboltas, A., … Houston, K. (2017). Using the model statement to elicit information and cues to deceit in interpreter-based interviews. Acta Psychologica, 177, 44–53. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.04.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Mann, S. (2001). Telling and detecting lies in a high-stake situation: The case of a convicted murderer. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(2), 187–203. doi:10.1002/1099-0720(200103/04)15:2<187::AID-ACP696 > 3.0.CO;2-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Meissner, C. A., Fisher, R. P., Kassin, S. M., Morgan, C. A., III., & Kleinman, S. M. (2017). Psychological perspectives on interrogation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 927–955. doi:10.1177/1745691617706515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D., & Dubitsky, T. M. (1994). Why liking matters. Journal of Advertising Research, 34, 9–19. Retrieved from http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A16408474/AONE?u=wash41258&sid=AONE&xid=cc00fb66. Accessed 27 December 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, W. D., & Bull, R. (2012). How do interviewers attempt to overcome suspects’ denials?. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 19(2), 151–168. doi:10.1080/13218719.2010.543756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Granhag, P. A. (2013). Spatial and temporal details in intentions: A cue to detecting deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 101–106. doi:10.1002/acp.2878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, S. (2014). Negotiating in a Terrorist Environment. In J. Pearce, (Ed.), Terrorism Case Studies (pp. 144–167). Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, S. (2015). What Communication Skills Are Effective In Dealing With Antagonistic Situations: A Tale of Two Halves? Unpublished Thesis, Lancaster University, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). Good, you identified the suspect: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 360–376. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, S., Taylor, P., & Giebels, E. (2013). Crisis Negotiation: From Suicide to Terrorism Intervention. In M. Olekalns & W. Adair (Eds.), Handbook of Negotiation Research (pp.473–498). Melbourne AU: Elgar, Edwards Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Winton, R. (2015). Man gets 25 to life in Hollywood Sign Body parts murder. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-life-in-hollywood-body-parts-case-20151116-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA, 299(2), 211–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyer, N. A. (2010). You never get a second chance to make a first (implicit) impression: The role of elaboration in the formation and revision of implicit impressions. Social Cognition, 28(1), 1–19. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar