Profiles of SAVRY risk and protective factors within male and female juvenile offenders: A latent class and latent transition analysis

References

• Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
   Google Scholar
• Baglivio, M. T., Jackowski, K., Greenwald, M. A., & Wolff, K. T. (2014). Comparison of multisystemic therapy and functional family therapy effectiveness: A multiyear statewide propensity score matching analysis of juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(9), 1033–1056. doi:10.1177/0093854814543272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State's research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/873
   Google Scholar
• Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48–71. doi:10.1177/1557085105282897
   Google Scholar
• Boccaccini, M. T., Turner, D. B., & Murrie, D. C. (2008). Do some evaluators report consistently higher or lower PCL-R scores than others? Findings from a statewide sample of sexually violent predator evaluations. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 14(4), 262. doi:10.1037/a0014523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2003). Manual for the structured risk assessment of violence in youth (SAVRY), version 1.1. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T. (2007). Explanatory diversity among female delinquents: examining taxonomic heterogeneity. In R. Zaplin (Ed.), Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions, 2nd Edition (pp. 197–232). Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, T., Breitenbach, M., & Dieterich, W. (2008). Towards an explanatory taxonomy of adolescent delinquents: Identifying several social-psychological profiles. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24(2), 179–203. doi:10.1007/s10940-008-9045-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Stevens, T. (2008). troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41(1), 162–189. Girls’ doi:10.1375/acri.41.1.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. G. (2014). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Fourth edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V., & Sparrow, S. (1981). Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: Applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 86, 127–137.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Veldhuizen, A., Vullings, K., Helmers, N., & van Hoof, L. (2016). Protective factors for juvenile and young adult boys and girls. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Di Mari, R., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. (2016). Bias-adjusted three-step latent Markov modeling with covariates. Structured Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(5), 649–660. doi:10.1080/10705511.2016.1191015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., & Vincent, G. M. (2008). Juvenile psychopathy: A clinical construct in need of restraint?. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(2), 186–197. doi:10.1080/15228930801964042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., Yin, Y., & Anderson, S. J. (2002). Are within-individual causes of delinquency the same as between-individual causes?. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12(1), 53–68. doi:10.1002/cbm.48610.1002/cbm.48610.1002/cbm.486
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2013). Offending from childhood to late middle age: Recent results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., Kerig, P. K., Desai, N., & Feierman, J. (2016). Psychosocial interventions for traumatized youth in the juvenile justice system: Research, evidence base, and clinical/legal challenges. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 5(1), 31–49. Retrieved from http://www.journalofjuvjustice.org/JOJJ0501/JOJJ0501.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gammelgård, M., Weizmann-Henelius, G., Koivisto, A. M., Eronen, M., & Kaltiala-Heino, R. (2012). Gender differences in violence risk profiles. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23(1), 76–94. doi:10.1080/14789949.2011.639898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatti, U., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2009). Iatrogenic effect of juvenile justice. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(8), 991–998. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02057.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haganee, Z., Peterson-Badali, M., & Skilling, T. (2014). Making “What Works” work: examining probation officers’ experiences addressing the criminogenic needs of juvenile offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54(1), 37–59. doi:10.1080/10509674.2014.980485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L. B., Bongers, I., Nicholls, T. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2016). Identifying gender specific risk/need areas for male and female juvenile offenders: Factor analyses with the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Law & Human Behavior, 40(1), 82–96. doi:10.1037/lhb0000158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L. B., Nicholls, T. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2014). Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL:YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments. Assessment. 21(3), 324–339. doi:10.1177/1073191113498113
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latessa, E. (2011). Why the risk and needs principles are relevant to correctional programs (even to employment programs). Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 973–977. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00759.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurran, M., & Bruford, S. (2016). Case formulation quality checklist: a revision based upon clinicians’ views. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(1), 31–38. doi:10.1108/JFP-05-2015-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. doi:10.1080/10705510701575396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, S. R., Lee, Z., & Moretti, M. M. (2010). Gender differences in risk factors for violence: An examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. Aggressive Behavior, 36(6), 390–404. doi:10.1002/ab.20352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson-Badali, M., Skilling, T., & Haqanee, Z. (2015). Examining implementation of risk assessment in case management for youth in the justice system. Criminal Justice and Bahavior, 42(3), 304–320. doi:10.1177/0093854814549595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. doi:10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S., Fraser, M. W., & Day, S. H. (2007). Predictive validity of the Joint Risk Matrix with juvenile offenders: A focus on gender and race/ethnicity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 348–361. doi:10.1177/0093854806292244
   Google Scholar
• Schwalbe, C. S., Macy, R. J., Day, S. H., & Fraser, M. W. (2008). Classifying offenders: An application of latent class analysis to needs assessment in juvenile justice. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 6(3), 279–294. doi:10.1177/1541204007313383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheidow, A. J., Jayawardhana, J., Bradford, W. D., Henggeler, S. W., & Shapiro, S. B. (2012). Money matters: Cost-effectiveness of juvenile drug court with and without evidence-based treatments. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 21(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/1067828X.2012.636701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Luebbers, S., Ferguson, M., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Dolan, M. (2014). The utilioty of the SAVRY across ethnicity in Australian young offenders. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 31–45. doi:10.1037/a0033972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rich, P. (2011). Forensic Case Formulation with Children and Adolescents. In P. Sturmey & M. MacMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 217–235). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119977018.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Taxman, F. S., & Caudy, M. S. (2015). Risk tells us who, but not what or how. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 71–103. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12116
   Google Scholar
• Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Comparison of self-report and official data for measuring crime. In J. V. Pepper & C. V. Petrie (Eds.), Measurement Problems in Criminal Justice Research: Workshop Summary (pp. 43–94). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vallès, L., & Hilterman, E. L. B. (2006). SAVRY: Manual para la valoración estructurada de riesgo de violencia en jóvenes, Catalán/Spanisch version. Barcelona: Centre d’Estudis Juridícs i Formació Especialitzada.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(04), 450–469. doi:10.1093/pan/mpq025
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Latent GOLD 4.0 user’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2008). LG-syntax user’s guide: Manual for Latent GOLD 4.5 syntax module. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vermunt, J. K., Tran, B., & Magidson, J. (2008). Latent class models in longitudinal research. In S. Menard (Ed.), Handbook of longitudinal research: Design, measurement, and analysis (pp. 373–385). Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Gray, A. L., Shaffer, C., Bhanwer, A., Tafreshi, D., & Douglas, K. S. (2016). Does reassessment of risk improve predictions? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI. Psychological Assessment. 29(9), 1096–1110. doi:10.1037/pas0000402
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Shaffer, C. S., Gray, A. L., & Douglas, K. S. (2017). Are adolescent risk assessment tools sensitive to change? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and the YLS/CMI. Law and Human Behavior, 41(3), 244–257. doi:10.1037/lhb0000238
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Nicholls, T. L., Cruise, K. R., Beneteau-Douglas, J., Desmarais, S. L., Barone, C. C., …., Webster, C. D. (2016). START:AV Knowledge Guide: A Research Compendium on the START:AV Strength and Vulnerability Items. Vancouver: BC Mental Health & Substance use services. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291332964_STARTAV_Knowledge_Guide-_A_research_compendium_on_the_STARTAV_strength_and_vulnerability_items
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M. (2006). Psychopathy and violence risk assessment in youth. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15(2), 407–428. doi:10.1016/j.chc.2005.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Fusco, S. L., & Gershenson, B. G. (2012). Field reliability of the SAVRY with juvenile probation officers: Implications for training. Law and Human Behavior, 36(3), 225–236. doi:10.1037/h0093974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. M., Guy, L. S., Perrault, R. T., & Gershenson, B. G. (2016). Risk assessment matters, but only when implemented well: A multisite study in juvenile probation. Law and Human Behavior, 40(6), 683–696. doi:10.1037/lhb0000214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. C., Bishop, A. S., Nurius, P. S., & Logan-Greene, P. (2016). The heterogeneity of treatment needs for justice involved girls: A typology using latent class analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 323–342. doi:10.1177/0093854815615162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2015). Detection of dynamic risk factors and correctional practice. Criminology & Public Policy, 14(1), 105–111. doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar