Protective Factors in Violence Risk Assessment: Predictive Validity of the SAPROF and HCR-20^V3

References

• Abidin, Z., Davoren, M., Naughton, L., Gibbons, O., Nulty, A., & Kennedy, H. G. (2013). Susceptibility (risk and protective factors) for in-patient violence and self-harm: Prospective study of structured professional judgment instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. BioMed Central Psychiatry, 13, 197. Retrieved from http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/197
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Belfrage, H., Fransson, R., & Strand, S. (2000). Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: A prospective study in two maximum-security correctional institutions. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11(1), 167–175. doi: 10.1080/095851800362445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2002). Structured assessment of violence risk in youth. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, E., Charette, Y., Crocker, A. G., & Reyes, A. (2010). The predictive validity of clinical ratings of the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(4), 271–281. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2010.534378
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. A., French, S., & Gendreau, P. (2009). The prediction of violence in adult offenders: A meta-analytic comparison of instruments and methods of assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(6), 567–590. doi: 10.1177/0093854809333610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavance, M. (2004). Handling missing items in quality of life studies. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 33(6), 1371–1383. doi: 10.1081/STA-120030155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., & de Ruiter, C. (2004). Differences between clinicians and researchers in assessing risk of violence in forensic psychiatric patients. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(1), 145–164. doi: 10.1080/14788940410001655916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2012). SAPROF guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• de Vogel, V., de Vries Robbé, M., de Ruiter, C., & Bouman, Y. H. A. (2011). Assessing protective factors in forensic psychiatric practice: Introducing the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 171–177. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2011.600230
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). Protective factors: Validation of the structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatry. Doctoral Thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & de Spa, E. (2011). Protective factors for violence risk in forensic psychiatric patients: A retrospective validation study of the SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(3), 178–186. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2011.600232
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Douglas, K. S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 440–457. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2015). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 53–61. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Koster, K., & Bogaerts, S. (2015). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 51–70. doi: 10.1177/1079063214550168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M., Stapel, M., Hilterman, E., & de Vogel, V. (2015). SAPROF youth version: structured assessment of protective factors for violence risk – youth version. Van der Hoeven Kliniek.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries Robbé, M., & Willis, G. M. (2017). Assessment of protective factors in clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., Wilson, C. M., & Brink, J. (2012). Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: Reliability and validity of START assessments. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 685–700. doi: 10.1037/a0026668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, M. C., & Rennie, C. E. (2008). The structured assessment of violence risk in youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with Conduct Disorder. Psychological Assessment, 20(1), 35–46. doi: 10.1037/1040-359020.1.35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Blanchard, A. J. E., & Hendry, M. C. (2013). Violence risk assessment and management: Putting structured professional judgment into practice. In C. Logan & L. Johnstone (Eds.), Managing clinical risk: A guide to effective practice (pp. 29–55). London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3 assessing risk for violence, version 3 user guide. Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Hart, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Services, 54(10), 1372–1379. Retrieved from http://ps.psychiatryonline.org doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.54.10.1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M., Power, L. A., Coid, J., Kallis, C., Ullrich, S., & Shaw, J. (2014). Predicting post-discharge community violence in England and Wales using the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 140–147. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2014.906517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P. (2007). Advancing knowledge about desistance. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(1), 125–134. doi: 10.1177/1043986206298954
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune, C., & Ward, T. (2017). Problems in protective factor research and practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox-Wasylyshyn, S. M., & El-Masri, M. M. (2005). Handling missing data in self-report measures. Research in Nursing & Health, 28(6), 488–495. doi: 10.1002/nur.20100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadon, L., Johnstone, L., & Cooke, D. (2006). Situational variables and institutional violence: A systematic review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(5), 515–534. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2006.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B., Carroll, A., & Brett, A. (2010). Structured risk assessment in community forensic mental health practice. Australasian Psychiatry, 18(6), 538–541. doi: 10.3109/10398562.2010.498513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L. S. (2008). Performance indicators of the structured professional judgment approach for assessing risk for violence to others: A meta-analytic survey. Unpublished thesis, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hurducas, C. C., Singh, J. P., de Ruiter, C., & Petrila, J. (2014). Violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review of surveys. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 181–192. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2014.942923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansman-Hart, E. M., Seto, M. C., Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., & Côté, G. (2011). International trends in demand for forensic mental health services. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(4), 326–336. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2011.625591
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, L., & Cooke, D. J. (2008). PRISM: Promoting Risk Intervention by Situational Management. Structured Professional Guidelines for Assessing Situational Risk Factors for Violence in Institutional Settings.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N. J., & Brown, S. L. (2008). Positive reframing: The benefits of incorporating protective factors into risk assessment protocols. Crime Scene, 15(1), 22–24. Retrieved from http://www.cpa.ca/cpasite/UserFiles/Documents/Criminal%20Justice/Crime%20Scene%202008-04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, H. G., O’Neill, C., Flynn, G., & Gill, P. (2010). The dundrum toolkit. Dangerousness understanding, recovery and urgency manual (The DUNDRUM Quartet). Four structured professional judgement instruments for admission triage, urgency, treatment completion and recovery assessment. Dublin, Ireland, Trinity College Dublin. Retrieved from: http://www.tara.tcd.ie/handle/2262/39131
   Google Scholar
• Klein, V., Rettenberger, M., Yoon, D., Köhler, N., & Briken, P. (2015). Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 71–90. doi: 10.1177/1079063214554958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepfisz, G., Daffern, M., & Day, A. (2017). Understanding protective factors for violent reoffending in adults. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijks, H. P. B., de Ruiter, C., & Doreleijers, T. A. H. (2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending. A study in three samples of adolescent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 568–587. doi: 10.1177/0886260509334403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S8–S23. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, D. (1994). Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(4), 783–792. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. E., Mitchell, A. E., Picchioni, M. M., & Dickens, G. L. (2013). Moderators of the predictive efficacy of the historical, clinical and risk management-20 for aggression in psychiatric facilities: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 255–270. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. E., & Dickens, G. L. (2016). Performance of protective factors assessment in risk prediction for adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 23(2), 126–138. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, M., Belfrage, H., Fredriksson, B., & Kristiansson, M. (2017). Violence during imprisonment, forensic psychiatric care, and probation: Correlations and predictive validity of the risk assessment instruments COVR, LSI-R, HCR-20V3, and SAPROF. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(2), 117–129. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2016.1266420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, M. E., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law and Human Behavior, 29(5), 615–620. doi: 10.1007/s10979-005-9832-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risk Management Authority. (2007). Review of current arrangements for risk assessment and management for restricted patients. Retrieved from http://www.rmascotland.gov.uk/files/8012/7263/5802/Review%20Of%20Current%20Arrangements%20for%20Risk%20Assessment%20and%20Management%20for%20Restircted%20Patients%20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. doi: 10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryba, N. L. (2008). The other side of the equation: Considering risk state and protective factors in violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 8(4), 413–423. doi: 10.1080/15228930802199382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P. (2013). Predictive validity performance indicators in violence risk assessment: A methodological primer. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 8–22. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., Hurducas, C., Arbach-Lucioni, K., Condemarin, C., Dean, K., … Otto, R. K. (2014). International perspectives on the practical application of violence risk assessment: A global survey of 44 Countries. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(3), 193–206. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Desmarais, S. L., & Van Dorn, R. A. (2013). Measurement of predictive validity in violence risk assessment studies: A second-order systematic review. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 31(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 499–513. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2013). Authorship bias in violence risk assessment? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 8(9), e72484. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, S., Belfrage, H., Fransson, G., & Levander, S. (1999). Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders – more important than historical data? A retrospective study of 40 mentally disordered offenders assessed with the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4(1), 67–76. doi: 10.1348/135532599167798
   Google Scholar
• Strub, D. S., Douglas, K. S., & Nicholls, T. L. (2014). The validity of version 3 of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme amongst offenders and civil psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148–159. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2014.911785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The State Hospitals Board for Scotland. (2014). Annual Report 2013/2014. Retrieved from http://www.tsh.scot.nhs.uk/Board/Docs/TSH%20Annual%20Report%20-%20main/TSH%20Annual%20Report%202013-14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich, S., & Coid, J. (2011). Protective factors for violence among released prisoners – effects over time and interactions with static risk. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(3), 381–390. doi: 10.1037/a0023613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojt, G., Slesser, M., Marshall, L., & Thomson, L. (2011). The clinical reality of implementing formal risk assessment and management measures within high secure forensic care. Medicine, Science and the Law, 51(4), 220–227. doi: 10.1258/msl.2011.010149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vojt, G., Thomson, L. D. G., & Marshall, L. A. (2013). The predictive validity of the HCR-20 following clinical implementation: Does it work in practice?. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 24(3), 371–385. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2013.800894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Martin, M., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Middleton, C. (2004). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START): An evaluation and planning guide. Ontario: St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton and British Columbia, Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Welsh, E., Bader, S., & Evans, S. E. (2013). Situational variables related to aggression in institutional settings. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(6), 792–796. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2013.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., Desmarais, S., Nicholls, T. L., & Brink, J. (2010). The role of client strengths in assessments of violence risk using the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(4), 282–293. doi: 10.1080/14999013.2010.534694
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., Geddes, J. R., & Fazel, S. (2012). Personality disorders, violence, and antisocial behaviour: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26(5), 775–792. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, G., Chu, C. M., & Lee, Y. (2015). Assessing protective factors of youth who sexually offended in Singapore: Preliminary evidence on the utility of the DASH-13 and the SAPROF. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 91–108. doi: 10.1177/1079063214561684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar