Examining the Evidence Base for Forensic Case Formulation: An Integrative Review of Recent Research

References

• Baldwin, V. (2011). Yorkshire & the Humber KUF Evaluation Report. 2010–2011. Nottingham: Institute of Mental Health.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, W., Feigenbaum, J., Jones, A., Sims, A., & Woodward, C. (2010). Development of the PD-KASQ (personality disorder–knowledge, attitudes and skills questionnaire). London: Oscar Hill Service, Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., Beeley, C., Patel, G., & Völlm, B. (2018). Training probation officers in case formulation for personality disordered offenders. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 28(1), 50–60. doi:10.1002/cbm.2006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Völlm, B. (2013). Case formulation in personality disordered offenders: Views from the front line. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23(4), 263–273. doi:10.1002/cbm.1887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., & Völlm, B. (2016). The implementation of case formulation by probation officers: Service user and carer views. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 27(2), 215–231. doi:10.1080/14789949.2015.1122821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology (2011). Good Practice Guidelines on the use of psychological formulation. Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Eells, T. D. (2007). Psychotherapy case formulation: History and current status. In T. D. Eeels (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Case Formulation (2nd ed., pp. 3–32New York: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., Namey, E., & McKenna, K. (2017). How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods, 29(1), 3–22. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 118–126. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
   Google Scholar
• Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., … Vedel, I. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018. Retrieved from http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hopton, J., Cree, A., Thompson, S., Jones, R., & Jones, R. (2018). An evaluation of the quality of hcr-20 risk formulations: A comparison between hcr-20 version 2 and hcr-20 version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 195–201. doi:10.1080/14999013.2018.1460424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, N., & Benefield, N. (2012). A joint offender personality disorder pathway strategy: An outline summary. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 22(3), 210–217. doi:10.1002/cbm.1835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauer, V., Walker, J., & Roberts, A. (2017). Offender personality disorder pathway: The impact of case consultation and formulation with probation staff. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 28(6), 825–840. doi:10.1080/14789949.2017.1331370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuyken, W. (2006). Evidence-based case formulation: Is the emperor clothed? In N. Tarrier (Ed.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 12–35). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2008). The science and practice of case conceptualization. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(6), 757–768. doi:10.1017/S1352465808004815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mapplebeck, C., Ramsden, J., Lowton, M., Short, S., & Burn, F. (2017). Embedding psychological thinking: An evaluation of a regional training model for probation staff. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 19(1), 37–46. doi:10.1108/JFP-12-2015-0053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullan, E., Ramsden, J., & Lowton, M. (2014). Offender personality disorder pathway: Evaluation of team consultation. Mental Health Review Journal, 19(3), 185–195. doi:10.1108/MHRJ-12-2013-0041
   Google Scholar
• McMurran, M., & Bruford, S. (2016). Case formulation quality checklist: A revision based upon clinicians’ views. The Journal of Forensic Practice, 18(1), 31–38. doi:10.1108/JFP-05-2015-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMurran, M., Logan, C., & Hart, S. (2012). Case formulation quality checklist, unpublished checklist.
   Google Scholar
• Minoudis, P., Craissati, J., Shaw, J., McMurran, M., Freestone, M., Chuan, S. J., & Leonard, A. (2013). An evaluation of case formulation training and consultation with probation officers. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23(4), 252–262. doi:10.1002/cbm.1890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G, & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Offender Management Service & NHS England (2015a). The offender personality disorder pathway strategy 2015. Retrieved from https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/02/opd-strategy-nov-15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Offender Management Service, & NHS England (2015b). Working with offenders with personality disorder: A practitioners guide. Retrieved from https://www.england.nhs.uk/commissioning/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2015/10/work-offndrs-persnlty-disorder-oct15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, R., Pluye, P., Bartlett, G., Macaulay, A. C., Salsberg, J., Jagosh, J., & Seller, R. (2012). Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(1), 47–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persons, J. B. (1989). Cognitive Therapy in Practice: A Case Formulation Approach. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Pluye, P., Gagnon, M. P., Griffiths, F., & Johnson-Lafleur, J. (2009). A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(4), 529–546. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, K., McMullan, E., & Ramsden, J. (2018). Developing offender manager competencies in completing case formulation: An evaluation of a training and supervision model. Probation Journal, 65(1), 27–38. doi:10.1177/0264550517744272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, J., Lowton, M., & Joyes, E. (2014). The impact of case formulation focussed consultation on criminal justice staff and their attitudes to work with personality disorder. Mental Health Review Journal, 19(2), 124–130. doi:10.1108/MHRJ-12-2013-0039
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., Higgins, C., & Quartey, C. (2017). The impact of collaborative case formulation with high risk offenders with personality disorder. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 28(6), 777–789. doi:10.1080/14789949.2017.1324579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., Minoudis, P., Craissati, J., & Bannerman, A. (2012). Developing probation staff competency for working with high risk of harm offenders with personality disorder: An evaluation of the pathways project. Personality and Mental Health, 6(2), 87–96. doi:10.1002/pmh.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeem, J. L., Louden, J. E., Polaschek, D. L., & Camp, J. P. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19(4), 397–410. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto, Q. R., Khanassov, V., Pluye, P., Hong, Q. N., Bush, P., & Vedel, I. (2014). Systematic mixed studies reviews: Reliability testing of the mixed methods appraisal tool. Paper presented at the Mixed Methods International Research Association Conference (MMIRA), Boston, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (2011a). Forensic case formulation: emerging issues. In P. Sturmey & M. McMurran (Eds.), Forensic case formulation (pp. 283–304). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sturmey, P., & McMurran, M. (Eds.). (2011b). Forensic case formulation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Völlm, B. (2014). Case formulation in personality disordered offenders – a Delphi survey of professionals. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 24(1), 60–80. doi:10.1002/cbm.1884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, C., Small, M., Lyon, H., Barker, L., & Akiboh, M. (2016). The impact of case formulation meetings for teams. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 10(2), 145–157. doi:10.1108/AMHID-09-2015-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar