The Role Played by Theory of Mind and Empathy in the Feigning of Psychopathology

References

• Abbey, J. D., & Meloy, M. G. (2017). Attention by design: Using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. Journal of Operations Management, 53, 63–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Jabeen, S., & Alam, F. (2015). Multimodal approach to identifying malingered posttraumatic stress disorder: A review. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience, 12(1-2), 12–20. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25852974
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alliger, G. M., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Mitchell, K. E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, H. N., Sison, G., & Wester, S. (1984). Intelligence and dissimulation on the personal orientation inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40(6), 1394–1398. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198411)40:6<1394::AID-JCLP2270400620>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardolf, B. R., Denney, R. L., & Houston, C. M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(6), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825580600966391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banovic, I., Filippi, F., Viglione, D. J., Scrima, F., Zennaro, A., Zappalà, A., & Giromini, L. (2021). Detecting coached feigning of schizophrenia with the inventory of problems – 29 (IOP-29) and its memory module (IOP-M): A simulation study on a french community sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1906798
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1023035012436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, K. T., Killeen, T. K., Brewerton, T., & Lucerini, S. (2000). Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61 Suppl 7, 22. Retrieved from https:///www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10795606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology—An evidence-based approach. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bubandt, N. O., & Willerslev, R. (2015). The dark side of empathy: Mimesis, deception, and the magic of alterity. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 57(1), 5–34. doi https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417514000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., Reis, A., Colombarolli, M. S., Pasian, S. R., Miguel, F. K., Erdodi, L. A., Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2021). Discriminating feigned from credible PTSD symptoms: A validation of a Brazilian version of the inventory of problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M., & Underhill, J. (2013). Estimated costs of malingered disability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology : The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 28(7), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craparo, G., Faraci, P., Rotondo, G., & Gori, A. (2013). The impact of event scale – revised: Psychometric properties of the italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 9, 1427–1432. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S51793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creamer, M., Bell, R., & Failla, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the impact of event Scale – Revised. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(12), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. B. (2009). The age of empathy; nature’s lessons for a kinder society. Harmony Books.
   Google Scholar
• Di Girolamo, M., Giromini, L., Winters, C. L., Serie, C. M. B., & de Ruiter, C. (2019). The questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy: A comparison between paper-and-pencil versus online formats in italian samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1389745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, M., & Fullam, R. (2004). Theory of mind and mentalizing ability in antisocial personality disorders with and without psychopathy. Psychological Medicine, 34(6), 1093–1102.
   Google Scholar
• Edens, J. F., Buffington, J. K., & Tomicic, T. L. (2000). An investigation of the relationship between psychopathic traits and malingering on the psychopathic personality inventory. Assessment, 7(3), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhai, J. D., Gray, M. J., Kashdan, T. B., & Franklin, C. L. (2005). Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects?: A survey of traumatic stress professionals. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(5), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauteck, P. K. (1995). Detecting the malingering of psychosis in offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854895022001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES‐D self‐rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 249–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<249::AID-JCLP2270390218>3.0.CO;2-Y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression. (3rd ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from http://bvbrhttp://www.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=030497357&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
   Google Scholar
• Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999). Interacting minds-a biological basis. Science (New York, N.Y.), 286(5445), 1692–1695. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5445.1692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeazzi, G. M., Spiliopulos, P., & Curci, P. (2004). Eppendorf schizophrenia inventory (ESI): Presentazione della versione italiana. Italian Journal of Psychopathology, 10(3), 322–330.
   Google Scholar
• Gegner, J., Erdodi, L. A., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Bosi, J., & Brusadelli, E. (2021). An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375
   Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Barbosa, F., Coga, G., Azeredo, A., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2020). Using the inventory of problems – 29 (IOP-29) with the test of memory malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 27(6), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929
   Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Perfetti, B., di Carlo, D. A., & Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond rare-symptoms endorsement: A clinical comparison simulation study using the minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the inventory of problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 12(3-4), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Pignolo, C., Young, G., Drogin, E. Y., Zennaro, A., & Viglione, D. J. (2021). Comparability and validity of the online and in-person administrations of the inventory of problems-29. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A clinical comparison, simulation study testing the validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an italian sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2020). An inventory of problems-29 sensitivity study investigating feigning of four different symptom presentations via malingering experimental paradigm. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(4), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, C., Lough, S., Stone, V., Erzinclioglu, S., Martin, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hodges, J. R. (2002). Theory of mind in patients with frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and alzheimer’s disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain : a Journal of Neurology, 125(Pt 4), 752–764. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve, R., & Mahar, D. (2010). The role of fluid and emotional intelligence in malingering. Australian Journal of Psychology, 62(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530903032836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, H. V., & Pritchard, D. A. (1996). Detecting malingering and deception. St. Lucie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, T. A., Hargreaves-Cormany, H., Muirhead, Y. E., & Meloy, J. R. (2018). Violence in animal cruelty offenders. Springer. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91038-3
   Google Scholar
• Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., Bosi, J., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2020). A clinical comparison simulation study using the inventory of problems-29 (IOP-29) with the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale (CES-D) in lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, ), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J., & Grieve, R. (2013). Faked depression: comparing malingering via the internet, pen-and-paper, and telephone administration modes. Telemedicine and e-Health, 19(9), 714–716. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonason, P. K., & Krause, L. (2013). The emotional deficits associated with the Dark Triad traits: Cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 532–537.
   Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS, 18(4), 625–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617712000240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mass, R., Haasen, C., & Wolf, K. (2000). The Eppendorf Schizophrenia Inventory (ESI). Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for assessment of characteristic self perception of cognitive dysfunctions by schizophrenic patients. Der Nervenarzt, 71(11), 885–892. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11103363 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001150050679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mass, R., Haasen, C., & Borgart, E. (2005). Abnormal subjective experiences of schizophrenia: Evaluation of the eppendorf schizophrenia inventory. Psychiatry Research, 135(2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mersman, J. L., & Shultz, K. S. (1998). Individual differences in the ability to fake on personality measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(2), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00160-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalska, K. J., Kinzler, K. D., & Decety, J. (2013). Age-related sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses across childhood and adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 3, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2012.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12650234 https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.8.1094.8379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaro, M., Toncini, A., Ferracuti, S., Tessari, G., Vaccaro, M. G., De Fazio, P., Pigato, G., Meneghel, T., Scarpazza, C., & Sartori, G. (2018). The detection of malingering: A new tool to identify made-up depression. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, D. M., Gordon, R. M., Ward, J. T., & Burkhardt, B. B. (2006). Characteristics of successful fakers versus unsuccessful fakers: Is empathy, intelligence, or personality associated with faking PTSD on the MMPI-2? Psychological Reports, 99(3), 747–750. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.99.3.747-750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poythress, N. G., Edens, J. F., & Watkins, M. M. (2001). The relationship between psychopathic personality features and malingering symptoms of major mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 25(6), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012702223004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queirós, A., Fernandes, E., Reniers, R., Sampaio, A., Coutinho, J., & Seara-Cardoso, A. (2018). Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy in a portuguese sample. PloS One, 13(6), E0197755. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, K. P., Kramer, J. H., & Miller, B. L. (2005). Patterns of cognitive and emotional empathy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnn.0000152225.05377.ab
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, P. J., & Knoll, J. (2005). Faking it: How to detect malingered psychosis. Current Psychiatry, 4(11), 12–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2. Ed., 2. Print. Ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2018). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. The Guilford Press. Retrieved from http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=none&isbn=9781462533503&uid=none
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Velsor, S. F., & Williams, M. M. (2020). A brief commentary on SIRS versus SIRS-2 critiques. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 275–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09379-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roma, P., Giromini, L., Burla, F., Ferracuti, S., Viglione, D. J., & Mazza, C. (2020). Ecological validity of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): An Italian study of court-ordered, psychological injury evaluations using the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) as criterion variable. Psychological Injury and Law, 13(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09368-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šömen, M. M., Lesjak, S., Majaron, T., Lavopa, L., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., & Podlesek, A. (2021). Using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Inventory of Problems Memory (IOP-M) in Malingering-Related Assessments: A study with a Slovenian Sample of Experimental Feigners. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09412-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparr, L. F. (1996). Mental defenses and posttraumatic stress disorder: Assessment of criminal intent. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 405–425. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.2490090302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffan, J. S., Kroner, D. G., & Morgan, R. D. (2007). Effect of symptom information and intelligence in dissimulation: An examination of faking response styles by inmates on the Basic Personality Inventory. Assessment, 14(1), 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106295404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(5), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2020). Inventory of problems–29: Professional manual. IOP-Test, LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Giromini, L., & Landis, P. (2017). The development of the inventory of problems-29: A brief self-administered measure for discriminating bona fide from feigned psychiatric and cognitive complaints. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(5), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1233882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viglione, D. J., Wright, D. M., Dizon, N. T., Moynihan, J. E., DuPuis, S., & Pizitz, T. D. (2001). Evading detection on the MMPI-2: Does caution produce more realistic patterns of responding? Assessment, 8(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110100800301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. S. (2004). The impact of event scale – revised. In J. P. Wilson, & T. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 168–189). The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, D. S., & Marmar, C. R. (1997). The impact of event scale – revised. In J. P. Wilson, & D. M. Keane (Eds.), Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (pp. 399–411). Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, C. L., Giromini, L., Crawford, T. J., Ales, F., Viglione, D. J., & Warmelink, L. (2021). An Inventory of Problems–29 (IOP–29) study investigating feigned schizophrenia and random responding in a British community sample. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 28(2), 235–254. [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1767720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics. Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
   Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2017). PTSD in Court III: Malingering, assessment, and the law. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 52, 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S., Jacobson, R., Einzig, S., Gray, K., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (2016). Can we recognise malingerers? The association between malingering, personality traits and clinical impression among complainants in civil compensation cases. Personality and Individual Differences, 98, 235–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar