Characterizing Contemporary Criminal Responsibility Evaluees Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF)

References

• American Law Institute (1962). Model Penal Code (proposed official draft). Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Author.
   Google Scholar
• Barendregt, M., Muller, E., Nijman, H., & de Beurs, E. (2008). Factors associated with experts’ opinions regarding criminal responsibility in The Netherlands. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 26(5), 619–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2012). Interpreting the MMPI-2-RF. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath Y. S. & Tellegen, A. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form) manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Porath, Y. S., & Tellegen, A. (2020). MMPI-3 technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boehnert, C. E. (1985). Psychological and demographic factors associated with individuals using the insanity defense. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 13, 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093185385013001-203
   Google Scholar
• Boehnert. C. E. (1987). Characteristics of those evaluated for insanity. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 15(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/009318538701500206
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R. (2003). Not guilty by reason of insanity. In T. Grisso (Ed.), Evaluating competencies (2nd ed., pp. 193–227). Plenum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., & Grisso, T. (1995). Psychological test use in criminal forensic evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26(5), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.26.5.465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, A. M., Morse, S. J., & Packer, I. K. (2013). Evaluation of criminal responsibility. In R. K. Otto & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol 11. Forensic psychology (2nd ed., pp. 440–472). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, W., Reddy, H. B., Green, D., Belfi, B., & Einzig, S. (2017). Inconsistent responding in a criminal forensic settings: An evaluation of the VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales of the MMPI-2-RF. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99, 286–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issues from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In S. Strack & M. Lorr (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291–315). Springer Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Helmes, E., & Reddon, J. R. (1993). A perspective on the developments in assessing psychopathology: A critical review of the MMPI and MMPI-2. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 453–471.
   Google Scholar
• Koi, L. E., & Chauhan, P. (2018). Criminal responsibility: Meta-analysis and study space. Behavioral Science and Law, 36(3), 276–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurlychek, R. T., & Jordan, L. (1980). MMPI profiles and code types of responsible and non-responsible criminal defendants. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(2), 590–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwok, S. C., Xu, X., Duan, W., Wang, X., Tang, Y., Allé, M. C., & Berna, F. (2021). Autobiographical and episodic memory deficits in schizophrenia: A narrative review and proposed agenda for research. Clinical Psychology Review, 83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. N. (1971). The dynamics of structured personality tests. Psychological Review, 78, 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1972). Some limitations of objective personality tests. In J. N. Butcher (Ed)., Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 45–58). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, B. E., Sellbom, M., Salekin, R. T., Toomey, J. A., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2013). An examination of the association between psychopathy and dissimulation using the MMPI-2-RF. Law and Human Behavior, 37(4), 219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. L., & Kan, L. Y. (2014). Test usage in four common types of forensic mental health assessment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(2), 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., Slobogin, C., Lyons, P. J., & Otto, R. K. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, H. Y., & Sumiyoshi, T. (2008). Does stimulation of 5-HT1A receptors improve cognition in schizophrenia? Behavioural Brain Research, 195(1), 98–102.
   Google Scholar
• M’Naghten’s Case (1843). 10 Clark & Finn, 200, 8 Eng. Rep. 788.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, W. (1972). Psychometric considerations for a revision of the MMPI. In J. N. Butcher (Ed.), Objective personality assessment: Changing perspectives (pp. 59–83). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, I. K. (1987). Homicide and the insanity defense: A comparison of sane and insane murders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 5(1), 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Pasewark, R. A., Jeffrey, R., & Bieber, S. (1987). Differentiating successful and unsuccessful insanity plea defendants in Colorado. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 15(1), 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Petrilia, J. (1982). The insanity defense and other mental health dispositions in Missouri. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 81–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice M. E., & Harris, G. T. (1990). The predictors of insanity acquittal. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13, 217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2016). An introduction to insanity evaluations. In R. Jackson & R. Roesch (Eds.), Learning forensic assessment: Research and practice (2nd ed., pp. 97–115). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & McKee, G. R. (1995). Use of the MMPI-2 in the assessment of criminal responsibility. In Y. S. Ben-Porath, J. R. Graham, G. C. N. Hall, R. D. Hirshman, & M. S. Zaragoza (Eds.), Forensic applications of the MMPI-2 (pp. 103–126). Sage Publishing
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Seman, W. (1983). Murder and criminal responsibility: An examination of MMPI profiles. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1(2), 89–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Seman, W., & Stampley, J. (1984). A study of socio-demographic characteristics of individuals evaluated for insanity. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 28(1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M. (2017). Using the MMPI-2-RF to characterize defendants evaluated for competency to stand trial and criminal responsibility. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1371259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M. (2019). The MMPI-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF): Assessment of personality and psychopathology in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15, 149–177. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., Toomey, A., Wygant, D. B., Kucharski, L. T., & Duncan, S. (2010). Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Validity Scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: A known-groups design. Psychological Assessment, 22, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellbom, M., & Wygant, D. B. (2018). Forensic applications of the MMPI-2-RF: A casebook. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steadman, H. J., Keitner, L., Braff, J., & Arvanites, T. M. (1983). Factors associated with a successful insanity plea. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140(4), 401–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarescavage, A. M., Alosco, M. L., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Wood, A. & Luna-Jones, L. (2015). Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) scores generated from the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF test booklets: Internal structure comparability in a sample of criminal defendants. Assessment, 22(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191114537347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellegen, A., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2008/2011). MMPI-2-RF (Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form): Technical manual. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau ( V2019). QuickFacts Table – [Michigan]; [Ohio]. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/MI,OH
   Google Scholar
• Wall, T. D., Wygant, D. B., & Gallagher, R. W. (2015). Identifying overreporting in a correctional setting: Utility of the MMPI-2 Restructured Form Validity Scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 610–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. S. (1999) Wide range achievement test-III. Wide Range, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wygant, D. B., Sellbom, M., Gervais, R. O., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Stafford, K. P., Freeman, D. B., & Heilbronner, R. L. (2010). Further validation of the MMPI-2 and MMPI-2-RF Response Bias Scale: Findings from disability and criminal forensic settings. Psychological Assessment, 22(4), 7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar