402
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

What Happens after Discharge from a Forensic Psychiatric Hospital?: An Analysis of Causally Complex Patterns of Recovery among People Found Non-criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Bonta, J., Law, M., & Hanson, K. (1998). The prediction of criminal and violent recidivism among mentally disordered offenders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.123.2.123
  • Brunette, M. F., Drake, R. E., Woods, M., & Hartnett, T. (2001). A comparison of long-term and short-term residential treatment programs for dual diagnosis patients. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 52(4), 526–528. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.52.4.526
  • Burgess, P., Pirkis, J., Coombs, T., & Rosen, A. (2011). Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 45(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048674.2010.549996
  • Carey, K. B. (1997). Reliability and validity of the time-line follow-back interview among psychiatric outpatients: A preliminary report. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 11(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.11.1.26
  • Chadwick, S. L. (2011). Investigating recovery in psychosis: A personal construct repertory grid study [Doctorate]. University of Herefordshire. https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/handle/2299/6372?show=full
  • Conrad, K. J., Yagelka, J. R., Matters, M. D., Rich, A. R., Williams, V., & Buchanan, M. (2001). Reliability and validity of a modified Colorado Symptom Index in a national homeless sample. Mental Health Services Research, 3(3), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011571531303
  • Corrigan, P. W., Giffort, D., Rashid, F., Leary, M., & Okeke, I. (1999). Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Mental Health Journal, 35(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018741302682
  • Corrigan, P. W., Salzer, M., Ralph, R. O., Sangster, Y., & Keck, L. (2004). Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 30(4), 1035–1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007118
  • Cote, G., & Hodgins, S. (2003). Les troubles mentaux et le comportement criminel. In M. Leblanc, M. Ouimet, & D. Szabo (Eds.), Traité de Criminologie (Vol. 3). Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
  • Crocker, A. G., Mueser, K. T., Drake, R. E., Clark, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Ackerson, T. H., & Alterman, A. I. (2005). Antisocial personality, psychopathy, and violence in persons with dual disorders - A longitudinal analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(4), 452–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854805276407
  • Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., & Braithwaite, E. (2011). Urbanization, substance use and management of criminal behavior: Canadian trajectory study of individuals not criminally responsible due to mental disorder. 11th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Barcelona, June 29–July 1.
  • Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., Seto, M. C., Charette, Y., Côté, G., & Caulet, M. (2015a). The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 2: The people behind the label. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 60(3), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371506000305
  • Crocker, A. G., Nicholls, T. L., Seto, M. C., Cote, G., Charette, Y., & Caulet, M. (2015b). The national trajectory project of individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in Canada. Part 1: Context and methods. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 60(3), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674371506000304
  • de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., & Douglas, K. S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 24(4), 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
  • Douglas, K. S., Ogloff, J. R. P., Nicholls, T. L., & Grant, I. (1999). Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 917–930. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.917
  • Douglas, K. S., & Webster, C. D. (1999). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme - Concurrent validity in a sample of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854899026001001
  • Drake, R. E., Xie, H. Y., McHugo, G. J., & Shumway, M. (2004). Three-year outcomes of long-term patients with co-occurring bipolar and substance use disorders. Biological Psychiatry, 56(10), 749–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosych.2004.08.020
  • Eisenberg, M. J., van Horn, J. E., Dekker, J. M., Assink, M., van der Put, C. E., Hendriks, J., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2019). Static and dynamic predictors of general and violent criminal offense recidivism in the forensic outpatient population: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(5), 732–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854819826109
  • Essock, S. M., Mueser, K. T., Drake, R. E., Covell, N. H., McHugo, G. J., Frisman, L. K., Kontos, N. J., Jackson, C. T., Townsend, F., & Swain, K. (2006). Comparison of ACT and standard case management for delivering integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 57(2), 185–196. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.57.2.185
  • Grann, M., Belfrage, H., & Tengstrom, A. (2000). Actuarial assessment of risk for violence - Predictive validity of the VRAG and the historical part of the HCR-20. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027001006
  • Haque, K., & cree, A. (2010). Implementation of the START (short-term assessment of risk and treatability) in four UK secure hospitals. 10th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Vancouver.
  • Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Quinsey, V. L. (1993). Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders - The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20(4), 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854893020004001
  • Kroner, D. G., & Mills, J. F. (2001). The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28(4), 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385480102800405
  • Livingston, J. D., Wilson, D., Tien, G., & Bond, L. (2003). A follow-up study of persons found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 48(6), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800608
  • McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., & Xie, H. Y. (1999). Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study. Psychiatric Services (Washington, DC), 50(6), 818–824. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.50.6.818
  • Melnychuk, R. M., Verdun-Jones, S. N., & Brink, J. (2009). Geographic Risk Management: A spatial study of mentally disordered offenders discharged from forensic psychiatric care. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 8(3), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999010903358755
  • Mueser, K. T., Drake, R. E., Clark, R. E., McHugo, G. J., Mercer-McFadden, C., & Ackerson, T. H. (1995). Evaluating substance abuse in persons with severe mental illness. Human Services Research Institute.
  • Nicholls, T. L., Desmarais, S., & Brink, J. (2009). The START across continuum of care: Implementation in a forensic psychiatric service. The 9th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Nicholls, T. L., Webster, C. D., Brin, K. J., & Martin, M.-L. (2008). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability. In B. Cutler & P. Zapf (Eds.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law (pp. 744–746). Sage.
  • Nonstad, K., Nesset, M. B., Kroppan, E., Pedersen, T. W., Nøttestad, J. A., Almvik, R., & Palmstierna, T. (2010). Predictive validity and other psychometric properties of the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START) in a Norwegian high secure hospital. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(4), 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.534958
  • Piat, M., Sabetti, J., & Bloom, D. (2010). The transformation of mental health services to a recovery-orientated system of care: Canadian decision maker perspectives. The International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 56(2), 168–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764008100801
  • Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (2006). Mentally disordered offenders: Appraising and managing risk. In V. L. Quinsey, G. T. Harris, M. E. Rice, & C. A. Cormier (Eds.), The law and public policy (2nd ed., pp. 61–81). American Psychological Association.
  • Ragin, C. (1997). User’s guide to fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Irvine, CA: University of California.
  • Ragin, C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ragin, C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. University of Chicago Press.
  • Ramesh, T., Igoumenou, A., Vazquez Montes, M., & Fazel, S. (2018). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry: The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 52, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007
  • Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226569
  • Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005575113507
  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2010). Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913210X12493538729793
  • Schneider, C. Q., & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139004244
  • Sheldrick, C. (1999). Practitioner review: The assessment and management of risk in adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(4), 507–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963099003972
  • Shern, D. L., Wilson, N. Z., Coen, A. S., Patrick, D. C., Foster, M., Bartsch, D. A., & Demmler, J. (1994). Client outcomes II: Longitudinal client data from the Colorado treatment outcome study. The Milbank Quarterly, 72(1), 123–148. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8164605 https://doi.org/10.2307/3350341
  • Viljoen, S., Nicholls, T. L., Greaves, C., & Brink, J. (2010). Gender comparison of resilience and community reintegration among forensic psychiatric patients: A preliminary study. 10th Annual Conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health, Vancouver.
  • Webster, C. D., Martin, M.-L., Nicholls, T. L., & Middleton, C. (2004). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). St-Joseph’s Healthcare.
  • Webster, C. D., Martin, M. L., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Manual for the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START) (revised). Version 1.1. Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission and St. Joseph’s Healthcare.
  • Webster, C. D., Nicholls, T. L., Martin, M. L., Desmarais, S. L., & Brink, J. (2006). Short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START): The case for a new structured professional judgment scheme. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 24(6), 747–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.737
  • Wilson, C. M., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., & Brink, J. (2010). The role of client strengths in assessments of violence risk using the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9(4), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2010.534694

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.