Reflections on collaborative research: to what extent and on whose terms?

References

• Barnes, C. 1990. ‘Cabbage Syndrome.’ The Social Construction of Dependence. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and A. Sheldon. 2007. “‘Emancipatory’ Disability Research and Special Educational Needs.” In The Sage Handbook of Special Education, edited by L. Florian, 233–243. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Barron, K. 1999. “Ethics in Qualitative Social Research on Marginalized Groups.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 1 (1): 38–49. doi:10.1080/15017419909510736.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, K. 2001. “Autonomy in Everyday Life for Whom?” Disability & Society 16 (3): 431–447. doi:10.1080/09687590120045987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, K. 2011. “Språkbruk och beslutsmakt – några reflektioner [Language and Decisional Power].” In Omsorg i förändring. En vänbok till Karl Grunewald [Care in Change. A Friend Book to Karl Grunewald], edited by M. Tideman, T. Barrow, and O. Andersson, 107–118. Stockholm: Intra
   Google Scholar
• Björnsdóttir, K., and R. Traustadóttir. 2010. “Stuck in the Land of Disability? The Intersection of Learning Difficulties, Class, Gender and Religion.” Disability & Society 25 (1): 49–62. doi:10.1080/09687590903363340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cotterill, P. 1992. “Interviewing Women. Issues of Friendship, Vulnerability, and Power.” Women's Studies International Forum 15 (5–6): 593–606. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(92)90061-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdtman, E., M. Tideman, C. Fleetwood, and K. Moller. 2012. “Research Initiation Based on Idea-circles: From Research Object to Co-actor.” Disability & Society 27 (6): 879–882. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.705055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, S., and J. Swain 1997. “Changing Disability Research: Participating and Emancipatory Research with Disabled People.” Physiotherapy 83 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66107-X.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D. 2004. “Social Model and Services: An Oxymoron?” In Disability Policy and Practice: Applying the Social Model, edited by C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 144–159. Leeds: The Disability Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. Knowledge & Human Interests. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyder, E., and C. Tissot. 2013. “‘That's Definite Discrimination’: Practice under the Umbrella of Inclusion.” Disability & Society 28 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.695579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, K. 2004. “Madness, Badness and Sadness Revisited: Ontology Control in ‘mental health land’.” In Gender and Disability Research in the Nordic Countries, edited by K. Kristiansen and R. Traustadóttir, 365–393. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, P. 2009. “Supporting People with Intellectual Disabilities to Take Part in Focus Groups: Reflections on a Research Project.” Disability & Society 24 (7): 845–856. doi:10.1080/09687590903283431.
   Google Scholar
• Lunn, M., and R. Munford. 2007. “‘She Knows Who She Is! But Can She Find Herself in the Analysis?’:Feminism, Disability and Research Practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 9 (2): 65–77. doi:10.1080/15017410601079460.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, I. 2000. “Against Normalization: Subverting Norms of Ability and Disability.” Science as Culture 9 (2): 201–240. doi:10.1080/713695234.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1992. “Changing the Social Relations of Research Production.” Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2): 101–114. doi:10.1080/02674649266780141.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 1997. “All We Are Saying is Give Disabled Researchers a Chance.” Disability & Society 12 (5): 811–814. doi:10.1080/09687599727074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, A. J. 2011. “Research with Individuals Labeled ‘Other’: Reflections on the Research Process.” Disability & Society 26 (3): 293–305. doi:10.1080/09687599.2011.560413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 1996. “Rules of Engagement: Doing Disability Research.” Disability & Society 11 (1): 115–121. doi:10.1080/09687599650023380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starring, B., and M. Söder. 2005. “Deltagarbaserad forskning [Participatory Research].” In Forskning om funktionshinder. Problem-utmaningar-möjligheter [Research on Disability. Problems-Challenges-Opportunities], edited by M. Söder, 103–123. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, E., and M. Priestley. 1996. “Parasites, Pawns and Partners: Disability Research and the Role of Non-disabled Researchers.” The British Journal of Sociology 47 (4): 699–716. doi:10.2307/591081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traustadóttir, R. 2001. “Research with Others: Reflections on Representation, Difference and Othering.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 3 (2): 9–28. doi:10.1080/15017410109510773.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2001. “Normalisation, Emancipatory Research and Inclusive Research in Learning Disability.” Disability & Society 16 (2): 187–205. doi:10.1080/09687590120035807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J. 2004. “Inclusive Learning Disability Research: The (nondisabled) Researcher's Role.” British Journal of Learning Disabilities 32 (2): 65–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3156.2004.00281.x.
   Google Scholar
• Walmsley, J., and H. Johnsson. 2003. Inclusive Research with People with Learning Disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, N. 2002. “Well, I Know This Is Going to Sound Very Strange to You, but I Don't See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and Disability.” Disability & Society 17 (5): 509–527. doi:10.1080/09687590220148496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body – Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt Höjer, M., and C. Åse. 1996. Politikens paradoxer. En introduktion till feministisk politisk teori [Policy Paradoxes. An Introduction to Feminist Political Theory]. Lund: Academia Adacta.
   Google Scholar
• Zarb, G. 1992. “On the Road to Damascus: First Steps Towards Changing the Relations of Disability Research Production.” Disability, Handicap and Society 7 (2): 125–138. doi:10.1080/02674649266780161.
   Google Scholar