The market of personal assistance in Scandinavia: hybridization and provider efforts to achieve legitimacy and customers

References

• Andersen, J., O. P. Askheim, I. S. Begg, and I. Guldvik. 2006. Brukerstyrt personlig assistanse. Kunnskap og praksis [User Controlled Personal Assistance. Knowledge and Practice]. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Andreassen, T. A. 2004. Brukermedvirkning, politikk og velferdsstat [User Involvement, Politics and Welfare State]. Dr. polit-avhandling avgitt ved Institutt for sosiologi og samfunnsgeografi, Universitetet i Oslo. Arbeidsforskningsinstituttets skriftserie 13. Oslo: Arbeidsforskningsinstituttet.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., J. Andersen, I. Guldvik, and V. Johansen. 2012. “Personal Assistance: What Happens to the Arrangement When the Number of Users Increases and New User Groups Are Included?” Disability and Society 28 (3): 353–366. 10.1080/09687599.2012.710013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P., H. Bengtsson, and B. Richter Bjelke. 2014. “Personal Assistance in a Scandinavian Context: Similarities, Differences and Developmental Traits.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research (forthcoming).
   Google Scholar
• Assistanskoll. 2011. Interview with Kristina Söderborg. http://assistanskoll.se/20111213-Socialstyrelsens-tillstandsenhet-avslag-beror-brist-pa-kompetens.html.
   Google Scholar
• Assistanskoll. 2012. Socialstyrelsen har nu tillståndsprövat alle anordnare med pågående verksamhet [The National Board of Health and Welfare Has Now Ended the Authorization Process of All the Providers That Are in Function]. http://assistanskoll.se/20121220-ocialstyrelsen-tillstndsprvat-alla-med-pgende-verksamhet.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., W. van de Donk, and K. Putters. 2005. “Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third Sector.” International Journal of Public Administration 28 (9–10): 749–765. 10.1081/PAD-200067320.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. 2012. Borgerstyret Personlig Assistance – afsluttende evalueringsrapport [Citizen Controlled Personal Assistance. Final Evaluation Report]. København: Socialstyrelsen.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. 2005. “Mixed Welfare Systems and Hybrid Organizations: Changes in the Governance and Provision of Social Services.” International Journal of Public Administration 28 (9–10): 737–748. 10.1081/PAD-200067318.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, A. 2008. “Hybrid Organisations: Background, Concept, Challenges.” In The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges, edited by S. P. Osborne, 279–292. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guldvik, I. 2003. Selvstyrt og velstyrt? Brukernes erfaringer med brukerstyrt personlig assistanse [Self-Governed and Well-Governed? The Users' Experiences with User Controlled Personal Assistance]. ØF-rapport nr. 03. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Guldvik, I., and J. Andersen. 2013. BPA – trekk ved kommunal saksbehandling, arbeidsgivernes tilrettelegging og assistentenes arbeidsbetingelser [User Controlled Personal Assistance – Features of Municipal Casework, the Employers' Adaptations and the Assistants' Working Conditions]. Forskningsrapport nr. 156. Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Lillehammer.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, A. O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hugemark, A. 2006. “Åter i stöpsleven: Personlig assistans mellan marknad och reglering [In the Melting Pot Again: Personal Assistance between Market and Regulation].” Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 13 (4): 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, M. 2008. “Conclusions: The State of Our Knowledge and Future Challenges.” In The Third Sector in Europe: Prospects and Challenges, edited by S. P. Osborne, 357–370. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. 2010. “Social Movement Service Organizations: The Challenges and Consequences of Combining Service Provision and Political Advocacy.” In Human Services as Complex Organizations. 2nd ed., edited by Y. Hasenfeld, 533–550. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, D. C. 2002. “The Emergence of Hybrid Organizational Forms: Combining Identity-Based Service Provision and Political Action.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31 (3): 377–401. 10.1177/0899764002313004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. E. 2010. “The Policy Advocacy Role of Human Service Nonprofits: Incentives, Involvement, and Impact.” In Human Services as Complex Organizations. 2nd ed., edited by Y. Hasenfeld, 505–531. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Board of Health and Welfare. 2011. Tillståndsplikt för privat verksamhet [Authorization of Private Providers]. http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/tillstand/tillstandsplikt-for-privat-verksamhet.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. 2010. “Conclusions. Public Governance and Public Services Delivery: A Research Agenda for the Future.” In The New Public Governance? edited by S. P. Osborne, 413–428. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., and T. Brandsen. 2010. “Public Governance and the Third Sector: Opportunities for Co-Production and Innovation?” In The New Public Governance? edited by S. P. Osborne, 223–236. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., and B. G. Peters. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. 1993. “Disabled People's Self-Organisation: A New Social Movement?” Disability, Handicap and Society 8 (3): 249–264. 10.1080/02674649366780261.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50 (155): 17–28. 10.1111/1468-2451.00106.
   Google Scholar