Personal assistance in a Scandinavian context: similarities, differences and developmental traits

References

• Askheim, O. P. 2001. Personlig assistanse for funksjonshemmede i Norden. Forskningsrapport nr. 61 [Personal Assistance for Disabled People in the Nordic Countries]. Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Lillehammer.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. 2002. “Personlig assistanse for funksjonshemmede – en nyskapning i den nordiske velferdsstaten [Personal Assistance for Disabled People – An Innovation in the Nordic Welfare State].” Tidsskrift for Velferdsforskning 5 (1): 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Askheim, O. P. 2005. “Personal Assistance – Direct Payments or Alternative Public Service. Does It Matter for the Promotion of User Control?” Disability & Society 5 (2): 122–139.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., and G. Mercer. 2006. Independent Futures. Creating User-Led Disability Services in a Disabling Society. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, C., G. Mercer, and T. Shakespeare. 1999. Exploring Disability. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, K., D. Michailakis, and M. Söder. 2000. “Funktionshindrade och den offentliga hjälpapparaten [Disabled People and the Public Services].” In Välfärd, vård och omsorg [Welfare and Care], edited by I. M. Szebehely, 38. Stockholm: SOU.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, H. 2004. “Vägen til personlig assistans [The Road to Personal Assistance].” In Personlig assistans och medborgarskap [Personal Assistance and Citizenship], edited by I. K. Gynnerstedt, 39–71. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, H., and K. Gynnerstedt. 2003. Assistansreformen i politik och förvaltning [The Assistance Reform in Policy and Management]. Malmö: Harecpress.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2002. “Thinking of ‘Mental Health’. Towards a Social Model.” Journal of Mental Health 11 (6): 581–584. doi:10.1080/09638230020023921
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. 2005. “Social Approaches to Madness and Distress. User Perspectives and User Knowledges.” In Social Perspectives on Mental Health, edited by T. Jew, 32–52. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfils, I. S. 2008. “Handicappedes positioner i handicappolitikken – fra object til ansvarlig samfundsborger [The Positions of Handicapped in Handicap Policy – from Object to Responsible Citizen].” In Rehabilitering for sundhedsprofessionelle [Rehabilitation for Health Professionals], edited by C. V. Nielsen, 125–135. København: Gade forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brattström, M. 1998. Likestilling for funksjonshemmede [Equality for Disabled People]. Oslo: Rådet for funksjonshemmede.
   Google Scholar
• Braye, S. 2000. “Participation and Involvement in Social Care: An Overview.” In User Involvement and Participation in Social Care, edited by H. Kemshall and R. Littlechild, 9–28. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, G. 1983. “Defining and Implementing the Independent Living Concept.” In Independent Living for Physically Disabled People, edited by N. M. Crewe and I. K. Zola, 4–27. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Edelbalk, P. G., and M. Svensson. 2005. Kundval för eldre och funktionshindrade i Norden. TemaNord [Customer Choice for Elderly and Disabled People in the Nordic Countries]. 207. Stockholm: Nordisk Ministerråd.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Försäkringskassan. 2011. Socialförsäkringen siffror 2011 [Social Insurance: Statistics 2011]. Stockholm: Försäkringskassan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen, B., B. Otnes, and B. Sundby. 2012. Pleie- og omsorgstjenesten 2012. Statistikk. [Care Services 2012: Statistics about Services and Service Users]. Rapport 43/2012, Oslo-Kongsvinger: Statistisk sentralbyrå [Statistics Norway]: Harecpress.
   Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., and R. Littlechild. 2009. Direct Payments and Personal Budgets. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glendinning, C., and P. A. Kemp. 2006. Cash and Care: Policy Changes in the Welfare State. Bristol: The Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helsedirektoratet. 2011. Brukerstyrt personlig assistanse – utredning av kriterier for en rettighetsfesting [User Controlled Personal Assistance – Report about Criteria for Statutory Rights]. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 2005. Brukerstyrt personlig assistanse (BPA) – utvidelse av målgruppen. Rundskriv I-15/2005 [User Controlled Personal Assistance – Extension of the Target Group]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Care Services.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 2007. Høringsnotat om sterkere rettighetsfesting av brukerstyrt personlig assistanse (BPA) [Consultation Paper About Statutory Rights of User Controlled Personal Assistance]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Care Services.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 2010. Lov om kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester m.m. (helse- og omsorgstjenesteloven). Prop. 1 L [Act About Municipal Health and Care Services]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Care Services.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 2011. Prop. 1 S [Proposition 1 S]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Care Services.
   Google Scholar
• Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. 2013. Endring i pasient- og brukerrettighetsloven – rett til BPA [Changes in the Act of Patient- and Service User Rights – the Right to User Controlled Personal Assistance]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Care Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hugemark, A., and K. Wahlström. 2002. Personlig assistans i olika former – mål, resurser och organisatoriska gränser. [Different Kinds of Personal Assistance – Goals, Resources and Organizational Limits]. Stockholm: Stockholm stad FoU-rapport 2002: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B. B., and N. Evans. 2005. Hjælpeordningen – en brugerundersøgelse [The Helping Arrangement – A Survey of the Users]. Århus: Videnscenter for BevægelseshandicapL.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, V., O. P. Askheim, J. Andersen, and I. Guldvik. 2010. Stabilitet og endring – Utviklingen av brukerstyrt personlig assistanse [Stability and Change – the Development of User Controlled Personal Assistance]. Forskningsrapport 143, Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Lillehammer.
   Google Scholar
• Klausen, K. K., and K. Ståhlberg, eds. 1998. New Public Management i Norden [New Public Management in the Nordic Countries]. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhnle, S. 2001. “The Scandinavian Welfare State in the 1990s: Challenged but Viable.” West European Politics 23 (2): 209–228. doi:10.1080/01402380008425373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenger, J. 2011. “Hjælpeordningen blev skabt ved et tilfælde [The Helping Arrangement Was Created by Accident]” i Muskelkraft 4/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Nordiska Nämden för Handikappfrågor. 1997. Handikappolitik i NORDEN [Handicap Policy in the Nordic Countries]. Kristianstad, NHH 4/97.
   Google Scholar
• Norges Handikapforbund. 1994. Brukerstyrt personlig assistanse. Erfaringer fra et forsøksprosjekt [User Controlled Personal Assistance. Experiences from a Pilot Project]. Oslo: Norges Handikapforbund.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2001. Fra bruker til borger [From Service User to Citizen]. Oslo: Official Norwegian Report.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 1998. Disabled People and Social Policy. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ot.prp. nr. 8. 1999–2000. Om lov om endring I lov av 13. september 1991 nr. 81 om sosiale tjenester mv. (brukerstyrt personlig assistanse) [Change in the Act of 13th September 1991 No. 81 About Social Services (User Controlled Personal Assistance)]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Proposition. 1992/1993: 159. Stöd och service til vissa funktionshindrade [Support and Service for Certain Groups of Disabled People]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Proposition. 2012/2013: 1. Regeringens budgetproposition Utgiftsområde 9 Hälsovård, sjukvård och social omsorg [The Government's Budget Proposition. Expenses for Area 9, Health Services and Social Care]. Stockholm: Sveriges Riksdag.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, C. 2000. “Money Talks? Competing Discourses in the Implementation of Direct Payments.” Critical Social Policy 20 (4): 459–477. doi:10.1177/026101830002000403
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Sandø, M., J. Andersen, and B. B. Jensen. 2007. Brugerstyret Personlig Assistance: Erfaringsindsamling om personlig hjælp til mennesker med handicap i Norge og Sverige [User Controlled Personal Assistance: Experiences from the Arrangement in Sweden and Norway]. Copenhagen: Videnscenter for Bevægelseshandicap og Styrelsen for Specialrådgivning og Social Service.
   Google Scholar
• Socialministeriet. 2003. Vejledning om sociale tilbud til voksne med handicap [Guidance About Social Services for Handicapped Adults]. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Social Affairs. www.social.dk.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen & Deloitte. 2012. Borgerstyret Personlig Assistance. Afsluttende evalueringsrapport [Citizen Controlled Personal Assistance. Final Evaluation Report]. København: The National Board of Health and Welfare and Deloitte.
   Google Scholar
• Sosial- og helsedepartementet. 1999. Høringsnotat. Utkast til endring i lov om sosiale tjenester – om brukerstyrt personlig assistanse [Consultation Paper. Draft to Change in Act of Social Services – About User Controlled Personal Assistance]. Oslo: The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Socialstyrelsen. 1997. Slutrapport [Final Report]. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 1995: 126. Kostnader för den statliga assistansersättningen [Costs for the State Funded Personal Assistance]. Stockholm: Official Swedish Report.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2001: 79. Välfärdsbokslut för 1990-talet. Slutbetänkandet/Komittén Välfärdsbokslut [Welfare Decisions for the 1990ies. The Final Report]. Stockholm: Official Swedish Report.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2005: 100. På den assistansberättigades uppdrag [For the Mission of People Justified to Have Personal Assistance]. Stockholm: Official Swedish Report.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2008: 77. Möjlighet att leva som andra [The Possibilities to Live Like Others]. Stockholm: Official Swedish Report.
   Google Scholar
• SOU. 2012: 6. Åtgärder mot fusk och felaktigheter med assistansersättning [Measures against Cheating and Misuse of Personal Assistance]. Stockholm: Official Swedish Report.
   Google Scholar
• Spandler, H. 2004. “Friend or Foe? Towards a Critical Assessment of Direct Payments.” Critical Social Policy 24 (2): 187–209. doi:10.1177/0261018304041950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ungerson, C., and S. Yeandle, eds. 2007. Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hauwermeiren, J., and E. Decruynare. 2009. Direct Payments in the Care. Current Situation in 8 European Countries. Gentbrugge: Expert Centre Independent Living.
   Google Scholar
• Wilberforce, M., C. Glendinning, D. Challis, J.-L. Fernandez, S. Jacobs, K. Jones, M. Knapp, et al. 2011. “Implementing Consumer Choice in Long-Term Care: The Impact of Individual Budgets on Social Care Providers in England.” Social Policy & Administration 45 (5): 593–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar