Investigating the Relationship Between the Contingencies That Maintain Gambling and Probability Discounting of Gains and Losses

References

• Beck, R.C., & Triplett, M.F. (2009). Test-retest reliability of a group-administered paper-pencil measure of delay discounting. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17, 345–355.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, G.B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 771–791.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M.R., & Johnson, T.E. (2007). The gambling functional assessment (GFA): An assessment device for identification of the maintaining variables of pathological gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 769–792.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, D.D., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2003). Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students. Behavioural Processes, 64, 355–367.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, G.P. (1984). A survey of some important techniques and issues in multiple regression. In D.E. Kieras & M.A. Just (Eds.), New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research (p. 13–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lesieur, H.R., & Blume, S.B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry 144, 1184–1188.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, G.J., & Bickel, W.K. (Eds). (2010). Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, G.J., Petry, N.M., & Johnson, P.S. (2009). Pathological gamblers discount probabilistic rewards less steeply than matched controls. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17, 283–290.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.C., Dixon, M.R., Parker, A., Kulland, A.M., & Weatherly, J.N. (2010). Concurrent validity of the gambling function assessment (GFA): Correlations with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) and indicators of diagnostic efficiency. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 4, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J.C., Meier, E., Muehlenkamp, J., & Weatherly, J.N. (2009). Testing the validity of Dixon & Johnson’s (2007) gambling functional assessment. Behavior Modification, 33, 156–174.
   Google Scholar
• Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 235–243.
   Google Scholar
• Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Cronce, J. M., & Larimer, M. E. (2002). Exploring college student gambling motivation. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 361–370.
   Google Scholar
• Petry, N.M., & Madden, G.J. (2010). Discounting and pathological gambling. In G.J. Madden and W.K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting (p. 273–294). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Shead, N.W., Callan, M.J., & Hodgins, D.C. (2008). Probability discounting among gamblers: Differences across problem gambling severity and affect-regulation expectancies. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 536–541.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.L., & Hantula, D.A. (2008). Methodological considerations in the study of delay discounting in intertemporal choice: A comparison of tasks and modes. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 940–953.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, R. (1981). Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency. Economics Letters, 8, 201–207.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., & Derenne, A. (2011). Comparing delay discounting rates when using the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods. Journal of General Psychology, 138, 300–318.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., & Derenne, A. (in press). Testing the reliability of paper-pencil versions of the fill-in-the-blank and multiple-choice methods of measuring probability discounting for seven different outcomes. The Psychological Record.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., & Flannery, K.A. (2008). Facing the challenge: The behavior analysis of gambling. Behavior Analyst Today, 9, 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., Miller, J.C., Montes, K.S., & Rost, C. (2012). Assessing the reliability of the Gambling Functional Assessment – Revised. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28, 217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., Miller, J.C., & Terrell, H.K. (2011). Testing the construct validity of the Gambling Functional Assessment – Revised (GFA-R). Behavior Modification, 35, 553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherly, J.N., Montes, K.S., & Christopher, D.M. (2010). Investigating the relationship between escape and gambling behavior. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 4, 79–87.
   Google Scholar