From semantic to syntactic repertoires: the significance of three-term contingencies

References

• Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and subsequent performance on tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 437–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47(2), 309–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, I 4, 531–558.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & McIlvane, W. J. (2002). Generalized identity matching-to-sample in cebus apella. The Psychological Record, 52(4), 441–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Fraser, C. (1963). The acquisition of syntax. In C. N. Cofer & B. S. Musgrave (Eds.), Verbal behavior and learning: Problems and processes (pp. 158–209). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, M., & McGonigle, B. (1984). Are children any more logical than monkeys on the five-term series problem? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 37, 355–377. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(84)90009-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chater, N., & Christiansen, M. H. (2010). Language acquisition meets language evolution. Cognitive Science, 34, 1131–1157. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01049.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1975). Reflections on Language. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Couvillon, P. A., & Bitterman, M. E. (1992). A conventional conditioning analysis of “transitive inference” in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 308–310. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.18.3.308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching to sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus Generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, H. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.106.4.342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Rose, J., de Souza, D. G., & Hanna, E. S. (1996). Teaching reading and spelling: Exclusion and stimulus equivalence. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 451–469. doi:10.1901/jaba.1996.29-451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Mackay, H. A., & Stoddard, L. T. (1987). Stimulus class membership established via stimulus-reinforcer relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 159–175. doi:10.1901/jeab.1987.47-159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Travis, R., Roy, D., Yadlovker, E., De Aguiar-Rocha, L., & Sturmey, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: A method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 575–593. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain–behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 19–33. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillan, D. J. (1981). Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 150–164. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.7.2.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, G., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Relational learning in stimulus sequences. The Psychological Record, 43, 599–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, A. J., Spellman, B. A., Levy, W. B., Dusek, J. A., & Eichenbaum, H. B. (2001). Relational learning with and without awareness: Transitive inference using nonverbal stimuli in humans. Memory & Cognition, 29, 893–902. doi:10.3758/BF03196418 [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffee, K., & Dougher, M. J. (2002). Contextual control of stimulus generalization and stimulus equivalence in hierarchical categorization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 433–447. doi:10.1901/jeab.2002.78-433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groskreutz, N. C., Karsina, A., Miguel, C. F., & Groskreutz, M. P. (2010). Using complex auditory-visual samples to produce emergent relations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 131–136. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, W. L., Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1997). Transitivity and emergent sequence performances in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 96–124. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.2360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, I. (2006). Contingencies of reinforcement in stimulus control. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 7, 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., Meleshkevich, O., & Dube, W. V. (2014). Merging separately established stimulus classes with outcome-specific reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 38–50. doi:10.1002/jeab.61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., & Sidman, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333–347. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyce, B. G., & Joyce, J. H. (1993). Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach relationships between English and Spanish words. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California Sea Lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131–158. doi:10.1901/jeab.2001.76-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumaran, D., & Ludwig, H. (2013). Transitivity performance, relational hierarchy knowledge and awareness: Results of an instructional framing manipulation. Hippocampus, 23, 1259–1268. doi:10.1002/hipo.22163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionallo-DeNolf, K. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning & Behavior, 37, 188–203. doi:10.3758/LB.37.2.188 [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCorquodale, K. (1970). On Chomsky’s review of skinner’s verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 83–99. doi:10.1901/jeab.1970.13-83
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A. (1985). Stimulus equivalence in rudimentary reading and spelling. Analysis and Intervention Indevelopmental Disabilities, 5, 373–387. doi:10.1016/0270-4684(85)90006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A. (1991). Conditional stimulus control. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 301–350). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A. (2012). Categories of relations between stimuli: Foundations for transitive inference and other emergent behavior. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 111–121. doi:10.1080/15021149.2012.11434411
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A. (2013). Developing syntactic repertoires: Syntheses of stimulus classes, sequences, and contextual control. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 14, 69–85. doi:10.1080/15021149.2013.11434446
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A., & Fields, L. (2009). Syntax, grammatical transformation, and productivity: A synthesis of stimulus sequences, equivalence classes and contextual control. In R. A. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A., Kotlarchyk, B. J., & Stromer, R. (1997). Stimulus classes, stimulus sequences, and generative behavior. In E. M. Pinkston & D. M. Baer (Eds.), Environment and behavior (pp. 124-137)). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A., & Sidman, M. (1984). Teaching new behavior via equivalence relations. In P. H. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McAuley (Eds.), Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 493–513). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay, H. A., Wilkinson, K., Farrell, C., & Serna, R. (2011). Evaluating merger and intersection of equivalence classes with one member in common. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 87–105. doi:10.1901/jeab.2011.96-87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, R. W., Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., & Demis, C. A. (1994). Matching to complex samples and stimulus class formation in adults with autism and young children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 753–772. doi:10.1007/BF02172284 [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, M. R., & Dougher, M. J. (1993). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542. doi:10.1901/jeab1993.60-529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydak, M., Stromer, R., Mackay, H. A., & Stoddard, L. T. (1995). Stimulus classes in matching to sample and sequence production: The emergence of numeric relations. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 16, 179–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGonigle, B. O., & Chalmers, M. (1977). Are monkeys logical? Nature, 267, 694–696. doi:10.1038/267694a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlvane, W. J., Dube, W. V., Kledaras, J. B., Iennaco, F. M., & Stoddard, L. T. (1990). Teaching relational discrimination to individuals with mental retardation: Some problems and possible solutions. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 283–296. [PubMed]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moerk, E. L. (1990). Three-term contingency patterns in mother–child verbal interactions during first-language acquisition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 293–305. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.54-293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, S. N., Ostreicher, M. L., & Ryan, J. D. (2010). Relational framework improves transitive inference across age groups. Psychological Research, 74, 207–218. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0244-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnelly, A., & Dymond, S. (2014). Relational memory generalization and integration in a transitive inference task with and without instructed awareness. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 109, 169–177. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2014.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnelly, A., Dymond, S., & Hinton, E. C. (2010). Relational reasoning with derived comparative relations: A novel model of transitive inference. Behavioural Processes, 85, 8–17. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2010.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nartey, R. K., Arntzen, E., & Fields, L. (2014). Two discriminative functions of meaningful stimuli that enhance equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 64, 777–789. doi:10.1007/s40732-014-0072-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nartey, R. K., Arntzen, E., & Fields, L. (2015). Enhancement of equivalence class formation by pretraining discriminative functions. Learning & Behavior, 43, 20–31. doi:10.3758/s13420-014-0158-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A. M., Payne, R., … Elliott, M. P. (2006). Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 299–321. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.139-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions: A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, B. A. (1969). Selective attention: The effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 539–550. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, G. S. (1968). A primer of operant conditioning. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Schenk, J. J. (1994). Emergent relations of equivalence generated by outcome-specific consequences in conditional discrimination. The Psychological Record, 44, 537–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. Psychological Record, 43, 823–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13. doi:10.1044/jshr.1401.05
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thomson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 215–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Authors Collaborative.
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidman, M., Wynne, C. K., Maguire, R. W., & Barnes, T. (1989). Functional classes and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 261–274. doi:10.1901/jeab.1989.52-261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdardottir, Z. G., Green, G., & Mackay, H. A. (2012). Stimulus equivalence, generalization, and contextual ctimulus control in verbal classes. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 28, 3–29. PMCID: PMC3363409.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sigurdardottir, Z. G., Green, G., & Saunders, R. R. (1990). Equivalence classes generated by sequence training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 47–63. doi:10.1901/jeab.1990.53-47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Sloutsky, V. M. (2010). From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops? Cognitive Science, 34, 1244–1286. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01129.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555. doi:10.1901/jeab.1991.56-519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. S. (1951). Mathematics, measurement and psychophysics. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer, R., & Mackay, H. A. (1993). Human sequential behavior: Relations among stimuli, class formation, and derived stimulus sequences. Psychological Record, 43, 107–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tomonaga, M. (1999). Establishing functional classes in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) with a two-item sequential-responding procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 57–79. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touchette, P. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15, 347–354. doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.15-347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T., & Riley, C. A. (1975). On the construction and use of representations involving linear order. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 381–410). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, R. W., Fields, L., & Arntzen, E. (2014). Discriminative functions and over-training as class-enhancing determinants of meaningful stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102, 47–65. doi:10.1002/jeab.91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treichler, F. R., & Raghanti, M. A. (2010). Serial list combination by monkeys (Macaca mulatta): Test cues and linking. Animal Cognition, 13, 121–131. doi:10.1007/s10071-009-0251-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treichler, F. R., & Van Tilburg, D. (1996). Concurrent conditional discrimination tests of transitive inference by macaque monkeys: List linking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 105–117. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varella, A., & deSouza, D. (2015). Using class-specific compound consequences to teach dictated and printed letter relations to a child with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 675–679. doi:10.1002/jaba.224 [PubMed]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.14.1.36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigo, R., & Allen, C. (2009). How to reason without words: Inference as categorization. Cognitive Processing, 10, 77–88. doi:10.1007/s10339-008-0220-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Fersen, L., Wynne, C. D. L., Delius, J. D., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.17.3.334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfert, E., & Hayes, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.50-125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne, C. D. L., von Fersen, L., & Staddon, J. E. (1992). Pigeons’ inferences are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior processes, 18, 313–315. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.18.3.313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonkers, K. (2012). Simple discrimination training in studying stimulus equivalence and math skills acquisition in developmentally delayed children ( Unpublished master’s thesis). University of North Carolina, Wilmington. Retrieved from http://dl.uncw.edu/etd/2012-3/yonkersk/kristinyonkers.pdf
   Google Scholar