Comparing the stimulus-pairing yes/no procedure to match-to-sample to establish equivalence classes with adults

References

• Arntzen, E. (2004). Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and subsequent performance on tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 437–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodsky, J., & Fienup, D. M. (2018). Sidman goes to college: A meta-analysis of equivalence-based instruction in higher education. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-0150-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, H. C., Debert, P., Lionello DeNolf, K., & McIlvane, W. J. (2015). Stimulus control in a go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli with pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 115, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colasurdo, C. R., Reeve, K. F., Jennings, A. M., Vladescu, J. C., Albright, L. K., & Reeve, S. A. (2023). Comparing compound pairs and single stimuli during match-to-sample to establish arbitrary stimulus classes with adults of typical development. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 24(1–2), 2–25. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2022.2164828
   Google Scholar
• Debert, P., Matos, M. A., & McIlvane, W. (2007). Conditional relations with compound abstract stimuli using a go/no‐go procedure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.46-05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeseth, S., Rosales-Ruiz, J., Duarte, A., & Baer, D. M. (1997). The quick development of equivalence classes in a paper-and-pencil format through written instructions. The Psychological Record, 47(2), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03395225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferman, D. M., Reeve, K. F., Vladescu, J. C., Albright, L. K., Jennings, A. M., & Domanski, C. (2020). Comparing stimulus equivalence-based instruction to a video lecture to increase religious literacy in middle-school children. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 13(2), 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-019-00355-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Arntzen, E., & Doran, E. (2020). Yield as an essential measure of equivalence class formation, other measures, and new determinants. The Psychological Record, 70(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00377-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful, a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2012.97-163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Rosen, D., Varelas, A., Adams, B. J., Belanich, J., & Hobbie, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67(3), 367–389. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1997.67-367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Varelas, A., Rosen, D., & Belanich, J. (1997). Equivalence class formation using stimulus-pairing and yes-no responding. The Psychological Record, 47(4), 661–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L., & Verhave, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1987.48-317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienup, D. M., Wright, N. A., & Fields, L. (2015). Optimizing equivalence‐based instruction: Effects of training protocols on equivalence class formation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48(3), 613–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant, E. E., Reeve, K. F., Reeve, S. A., Vladescu, J. C., & Kisamore, A. N. (2021). Comparing two equivalence‐based instruction protocols and self‐study for teaching logical fallacies to college students. Behavioral Interventions, 36(2), 434–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisante, P. C., Galesi, F. L., Sabino, N. M., Debert, P., Arntzen, E., & McIlvane, W. J. (2013). Go/no-go procedure with compound stimuli: Effects of training structure on the emergence of equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 63(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.1.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, G. P., Tiger, J. H., Ingvarsson, E. T., & Cammilleri, A. P. (2009). Influencing preschoolers’ free-play activity preferences: An evaluation of satiation and embedded reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heal, N. A., Hanley, G. P., & Layer, S. A. (2009). An evaluation of the relative efficacy of and children’s preferences for teaching strategies that differ in amount of teacher directedness. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marano-Frezza, K. F., Vladescu, J. C., Reeve, K. F., Sidener, T. M., & Cox, D. J. (2022). Training staff to create equivalence-based instruction materials in qualtrics. The Psychological Record, 72(2), 647–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-021-00497-4
   Google Scholar
• Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, K. (2011). An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(1), 8–11. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.82352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar