Effects of explicit permissive rules on behavior patterns in a common resources situation

References

• Anderson, D. C., & Whitman, T. L. (1972). Control of behavior through law: Theory and practice. Notre Dame Law Review, 47, 815–852. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol47/iss4/2
   Google Scholar
• Ayllon, T., & Azrin, N. (1968). The token economy: A motivational system for therapy and rehabilitation. Appleton Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Bentham, J. (1894/1914). Theory of legislation. Principles of the civil and penal code. Humpher Milford-Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. (1997). Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brechner, K. C. (1976). An experimental analysis of social traps. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(6), 552–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90054-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camargo, J., & Haydu, V. B. (2016). Fostering the sustainable use of common-pool resources through behavioral interventions: An experimental approach. Behavior & Social Issues, 25(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6328
   Google Scholar
• Cardenas, J. C., Janssen, M., & Bousquet, F. (2013). Dynamics of rules and resources: Three new field experiments on water, forest and fisheries. In J. A. List & M. K. Price (Eds.), Handbook on experimental economics and the environment (pp. 319–345). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cass, R. C., & Edney, J. J. (1978). The commons dilemma. A simulation testing the effects of resource visibility and territorial division. Human Ecology, 6(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, K., & Wright, G. (2005). Order without law? Property rights during the California gold rush. Exploration in Economic History, 42(2), 155–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., Hardin, R., & Levi, M. (2005). Cooperation without trust?. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. S., & Heal, M. (1979). Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edney, J. J., & Harper, C. S. (1978). The commons dilemma. A review of contributions from psychology. Environmental Management, 2(6), 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–182. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2646924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gërxhani, K., & Van Breemen, J. (2019). Social values and institutional change: An experimental study. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(2), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137418000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2019). Moral sentiments and material interests: Origins, evidence, and consequences. In H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests (pp. 3–39). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, U., Niederle, M., & Rustichini, A. (2003). Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 1049–1074. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360698496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Gender and competition at a young age. The American Economic Review, 94(2), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Nava, M. F., & Santoyo, C. (2012). Efectos de la probabilidad de cooperación de los otros sobre el consumo en dilemas de recurso [Effects of the probability of cooperation of others on consumption in resource dilemmas]. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 38(2), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v38.i2.63787
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, H. S. (1954). The economic theory of a common-property resource: The fishery. Journal of Political Economy, 62(2), 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1086/257497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., & Maley, R. F. (1977). Coercion: Legal and behavioral issues. Behaviorism, 5, 87–95. http://www.jstor.com/stable/27758895
   Google Scholar
• Henrich, J. (2000). Does culture matter in economic behavior? Ultimatum game bargaining among the machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon. The American Economic Review, 90, 973–979. http://www.jstor.org/stable/117318(4)10.1257/aer.90.4.973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review, 91, 73–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2677736(2)10.1257/aer.91.2.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., McElreath, R., Alvard, M., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Henrich, N. S., Hill, K., Gil-White, F., Gurven, M., Marlowe, F. W., Patton, J. Q., & Tracer, D. (2005). “Economic man” in cross-cultural perspective: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(6), 795–815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05000142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, J., & Henrich, N. (2006). Culture, evolution and the puzzle of human cooperation. Cognitive Systems Research, 7(2–3), 220–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlocker, C. E., Allison, S. T., Foubert, J. D., & Beggan, J. K. (1997). Intended and unintended overconsumption of physical, spatial, and temporal resources. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(5), 992–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, G. (1998). Properties of property: Conceptual issues. In R. C. Hunt & A. Gilman (Eds.), Property in economic context. Monographs in economic anthropology (pp. 7–22). University Press of America, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A. (2010). Introducing ecological dynamics into common-pool resource experiments. Ecology and Society, 15(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26268126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., Goldstone, R. L., Menczer, F., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Effect of rule choice in dynamic interactive spatial commons. International Journal of the Commons, 2(2), 288–312. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.67
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A., & Ostrom, E. (2010). Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science, 328(5978), 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2008). TURFs in the lab: Institutional innovation in real-time dynamic spatial commons. Rationality and Society, 20(4), 371–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108096786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, M. A., Tyson, M., & Lee, A. (2014). The effect of constrained communication and limited information in governing a common resource. International Journal of the Commons, 8(2), 617–635. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26523179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1975). Cooperation: An experimental analysis. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mérida, F. Y., & Pulido, L. (2023). Relaciones interindividuales de sanción en la apropiación de recursos comunes [Interindividual relationships of sanction in the appropriation of common resources]. Acta Comportamentalia, 31(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.32870/ac.v31i2.85832
   Google Scholar
• Messick, D. M., & McClelland, C. L. (1983). Social traps and temporal traps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9(1), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283091015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. E., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social learning and imitation. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Policies that crowd out reciprocity and collective action. In H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests. The foundations of cooperation in economic life (pp. 253–275). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (1973). Social traps. American Psychologist, 28(8), 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. (2016). Análisis de las relaciones interindividuales de intercambio. In E. Ribes, L. Pulido, N. Rangel, & E. Sánchez-Gatell (Eds.), Sociopsicología. Instituciones y relaciones interindividuales [Sociopsychology. Institutions and interindividual relationships] (pp. 214–244). Catarata.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L., & Ribes, E. (2023). Effects of individual or common resources availability in choosing individual or shared contingencies. Behavioural Processes, 205, 104805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, L., Ribes, E., Ortiz, I., Marinero, G., & Hernández, I. (2019). Effects of reciprocity induction on partial-altruistic and unequal-asymmetric labor exchange interactions. The Psychological Record, 69(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0319-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangel, N., Pulido, L., Ávila, A., Ordóñez, S., & Ribes, E. (2015). Partial-altruistic interactions as a function of reciprocity induction and written declarations. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 16(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2015.1065639
   Google Scholar
• Reuben, E., & Riedl, A. (2013). Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations. Games and Economic Behavior, 77(1), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribes, E. (2001). Functional dimensions of social behavior: Theoretical considerations and some preliminary data. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 27, 285–306. https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v27.i2.23578
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, E. (2016). Análisis de las relaciones interindividuales de sanción. In E. Ribes, L. Pulido, N. Rangel, & E. Sánchez-Gatell (Eds.), Sociopsicología. Instituciones y relaciones interindividuales [Sociopsychology. Institutions and interindividual relationships] (pp. 271–302). Catarata.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, E., & Pulido, L. (2015). Reciprocidad, tipos de contingencias sociales sistémicas y lenguaje: investigación de las interacciones interindividuales [Reciprocity, types of systemic social contingencies and language: Investigation of interindividual interactions]. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 32(1), 81–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ribes, E., Pulido, L., Rangel, N., & Sánchez-Gatell, E. (2016). Sociopsicología. Instituciones y relaciones interindividuales [Sociopsychology. Institutions and interindividual relationships]. Catarata.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, D. A., Jensen, T. D., Reed, A. J., Sullivan, D. K., & Schwab, M. (1983). The actions of others as determinants of behavior in social trap situations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(6), 522–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, R., & Perelberg, A. (2004). Why cooperate? An economic perspective is not enough. Behavioural Processes, 66(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D. (2011). The future of prior appropriation in the New West. Natural Resources Journal, 41, 769–793. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24888845
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. (1987). The possibility of cooperation. University Press.
   Google Scholar