Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?Footnote^†

† Preliminary findings were presented at the 2nd international workshop in the Black Forest, 1–4 July 2014, Freiburg, Germany. Theme: “The psychology of governing sustainable tourism mobility: Bridging the science-policy gap”.

References

• Anable, J., Lane, B., & Kelay, T. (2006). An evidence base review of public attitudes to climate change and transport behaviour. London: Department for Transport. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/sustainable/climatechange/iewofpublicattitudestocl5730.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arnocky, S., Milfont, T. L., & Nicol, J. R. (2013). Time perspective and sustainable behavior: Evidence for the distinction between consideration of immediate and future consequences. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 556–582. doi: 10.1177/0013916512474987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, S., Shaw, G., Coles, T., & Prillwitz, J. (2010). “A holiday is a holiday”: Practicing sustainability, home and away. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 474–481. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin-Seers, S., & Mair, J. (2009). Emerging green tourists in Australia: Their behaviours and attitudes. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(2), 109–119. doi: 10.1057/thr.2009.5
   Google Scholar
• Biel, A., Dahlstrand, U., & Grankvist, G. (2005). Habitual and value-guided purchase behavior. Ambio, 34(4–5), 360–365. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruderer Enzler, H. (2015). Consideration of future consequences as a predictor of environmentally responsible behavior: Evidence from a general population study. Environment and Behavior, 47(6), 618–643. doi: 10.1177/0013916513512204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.-F. (2015). Self-efficacy or collective efficacy within the cognitive theory of stress model: Which more effectively explains people’s self-reported proenvironmental behavior? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cremer, D. (1999). Trust and fear of exploitation in a public goods dilemma. Current Psychology, 18(2), 153–163. doi: 10.1007/s12144-999-1024-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318–332. doi: 10.1177/0022022107300278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. doi: 10.1177/0013916506297831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: Which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368–378. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, R., Hanss, D., & Larsen, S. (2015). Attitudes, efficacy beliefs, and willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(4), 281–292. doi: 10.1177/1467358415580360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doran, R., & Larsen, S. (2016). The relative importance of social and personal norms in explaining intentions to choose eco-friendly travel options. International Journal of Tourism Research, 18(2), 159–166. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., … Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 376–391. doi: 10.1108/07363760910988201
   Google Scholar
• Hanss, D. (2012). Explaining sustainable consumption: Findings from cross-sectional and intervention approaches (Doctoral thesis). University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Retrieved from https://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/6239/Dr.thesis_DanielHanss.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2010). Can I make a difference? The role of general and domain-specific self-efficacy in sustainable consumption decisions. Umweltpsychologie, 14(2), 46–74.
   Google Scholar
• Hanss, D., Böhm, G., Doran, R., & Homburg, A. (2016). Sustainable consumption of groceries: The importance of believing that one can contribute to sustainable development. Sustainable Development. doi:10.1002/sd.1615
   Google Scholar
• Hares, A., Dickinson, J., & Wilkes, K. (2010). Climate change and the air travel decisions of UK tourists. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), 466–473. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, T. (2011). The impact of values, environmental concern, and willingness to accept economic sacrifices to protect the environment on tourists’ intentions to buy ecologically sustainable tourism alternatives. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 11(4), 278–288. doi: 10.1177/1467358411423330
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, T., Marell, A., & Gärling, T. (2012). The mediating effect of value orientation on the relationship between socio-demographic factors and environmental concern in Swedish tourists’ vacation choices. Journal of Ecotourism, 11(1), 16–33. doi: 10.1080/14724049.2011.626859
   Google Scholar
• Higham, J. E. S., Cohen, S. A., & Cavaliere, C. T. (2014). Climate change, discretionary air travel, and the “flyers’ dilemma”. Journal of Travel Research, 53(4), 462–475. doi: 10.1177/0047287513500393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J., Shaffer, M. J., Balliet, D., & Strathman, A. (2012). Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: Evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1272–1287. doi: 10.1177/0146167212449362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J. A., Lasane, T. P., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 133–155. doi: 10.1348/014466601164731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joireman, J. A., Van Lange, P. A. M., & Van Vugt, M. (2004). Who cares about the environmental impact of cars?: Those with an eye toward the future. Environment & Behavior, 36(2), 187–206. doi: 10.1177/0013916503251476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juvan, E., & Dolnicar, S. (2014). The attitude–behaviour gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 48, 76–95. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2014.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kees, J. (2010). Temporal framing in health advertising: The role of risk and future orientation. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 32(1), 33–46. doi: 10.1080/10641734.2010.10505273
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L. (1992). Efficacy as a causal and moderating variable in social dilemmas. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 59–80). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khachatryan, H., Joireman, J., & Casavant, K. (2013). Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, J. J., & Strathman, A. (1997). Predictors of recycling behavior: An application of a modified health belief model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(20), 1799–1823. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01626.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., & Gouveia, V. V. (2006). Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(1), 72–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milfont, T. L., Wilson, J., & Diniz, P. (2012). Time perspective and environmental engagement: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Psychology, 47(5), 325–334. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2011.647029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., Rathouse, K., Scarles, C., Holmes, K., & Tribe, J. (2010). Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 627–645. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passafaro, P., Cini, F., Boi, L., D’Angelo, M., Heering, M. S., Luchetti, L., … Triolo, M. (2015). The “sustainable tourist”: Values, attitudes, and personality traits. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 15(4), 225–239. doi: 10.1177/1467358415576086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuitema, G., & De Groot, J. I. M. (2015). Green consumerism: The influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 14(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1002/cb.1501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2000). The effects of goal setting and group size on performance in a social dilemma. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32(2), 104–116. doi: 10.1037/h0087105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Research in Human Ecology, 6(2), 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322–348. doi: 10.1177/0013916593255002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNWTO-UNEP. (2008). Climate change and tourism: Responding to global challenges. Madrid: UNWTO. Retrieved from http://sdt.unwto.org/sites/all/files/docpdf/climate2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Lange, P. A. M., Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1992). Introduction and literature review. In W. B. G. Liebrand, D. M. Messick, & H. A. M. Wilke (Eds.), Social dilemmas: Theoretical issues and research findings (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verplanken, B., & Holland, R. W. (2002). Motivated decision making: Effects of activation and self-centrality of values on choices and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 434–447. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar