A framework for Military Bioethics

REFERENCES

• ACHRE (Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments). (1995) Final Report (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Arthur O. (n.d.) A Brief History of Military Contributions to Ethical Standards for Research Involving Human Subjects, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://artnscience.us/Med_Ethics/index.html; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, Tom L. & Childress, James F. (2013) Principles of Biomedical Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Belihar, General Robert. (1996) Testimony before the Presidential Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses, 12 January, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/gwvi/0112gulf.html; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Benatar, Solomon R. & Upshur, Ross E. G. (2008) Dual Loyalty of Physicians in the Military and in Civilian Life, American Journal of Public Health, 98(12), pp. 2161–2167.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzell, Emily & Preston, Samuel H. (2007) Mortality of American Troops in the Iraq War, Population and Development Review, 33(3), pp. 555–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CGR (Committee on Government Reform). (2000) The Department of Defense Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program: Unproven Force Protection, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CRPT-106hrpt556/html/CRPT-106hrpt556.htm; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Chomeau, John B. & Rudolph, Anne C. (1993) Intelligence Collection and Analysis: Dilemmas and Decisions, in: James C. Gaston & Janis Bren Hietala (Eds), Ethics & National Defense, pp. 112–132 (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Peter A. (2006) Medical Ethics at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib: The Problem of Dual Loyalty, Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 34(3), pp. 570–580.
   Google Scholar
• Enemark, Christian. (2008) Triage, Treatment, and Torture: Ethical Challenges for US Military Medicine in Iraq, Journal of Military Ethics, 7(3), pp. 186–201.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, William J. & Zwanziger, Lee L. (2003) Defending against Biochemical Warfare: Ethical Issues Involving the Coercive Use of Investigational Drugs and Biologics in the Military, Journal of Philosophy, Science, and Law, 3, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://jpsl.org/archives/defending-against-biochemical-warfare-ethical-issues-involving-coercive-use-investigational-drugs-and-biologics-military/; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Frisina, Michael E. (2003) Medical Ethics in Military Biomedical Research, in: Thomas E. Beam & Linette R. Sparacino (Eds), Military Medical Ethics, pp. 533–561 (Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Gostin, Lawrence O. (2000) Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).
   Google Scholar
• Graham, David E. (2010) Cyber Threats and the Law of War, Journal of National Security Law and Policy, 4(1), pp. 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Michael L. (2006) Bioethics and Armed Conflict: Moral Dilemmas of Medicine and War (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hartle, Anthony E. (2004) Moral Issues in Military Decision Making (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas).
   Google Scholar
• Howe, Edmund G. (2003a) Dilemmas in Military Medical Ethics Since 9/11, Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 13(2), pp. 175–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe, Edmund G. (2003b) Mixed Agency in Military Medicine: Ethical Roles in Conflict, in: Thomas E. Beam & Linette R. Sparacino (Eds), Military Medical Ethics, pp. 331–365 (Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Howe, Edmund G. (2003c) Point/Counterpoint: A Response to Drs. Sidel and Levy, in Thomas E. Beam & Linette R. Sparacino (Eds), Military Medical Ethics, pp. 312–320 (Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. (1957) The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil–Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Hilary F. (2007) A Glance at the Tip of a Big Iceberg: Commentary on ‘Recommendations for the Ethical Use of Pharmacological Fatigue Countermeasures in the US Military’, Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine, 78(1), pp. B128–B130(3).
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, Faris R. (2003) Honor, Combat Ethics, and Military Culture, in: Thomas E. Beam & Linette R. Sparacino (Eds), Military Medical Ethics, pp. 157–197 (Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Lifton, Robert J. (2004) Doctors and Torture, The New England Journal of Medicine, 351(5), pp. 415–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• London, Leslie, Rubenstein, Leonard S., Baldwin-Ragaven, Laurel & Van Es, Adriaan (2006) Dual Loyalty among Military Health Professionals: Human Rights and Ethics in Times of Armed Conflict, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 15(4), pp. 381–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, Kenneth D. & Hall-Boyer, Kathryn L. (2012) Military Objectives versus Patient Interests, in: John Jesus, Shamai A. Grossman, Arthur R. Derse, James G. Adams, Richard Wolfe & Peter Rosen (Eds), Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review, pp. 247–258 (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons).
   Google Scholar
• PACGWVI (Presidential Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans’ Illnesses). (1997) Final Report, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/gwvi/; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• Parasidis, Efthimios. (2012) Justice and Beneficence in Military Medicine and Research, Ohio State Law Journal, 73(4), pp. 723–793.
   Google Scholar
• Pleeter, Saul, Gallo, Alexander O., Gould, Brandon R., Li, Maggie X., Liu, Shirley H., Simon, Curtis J., Witschonke, Carl F. & Horowitz, Stanley A. (2012) Risk and Combat Compensation, Report of the Eleventh Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation, Supporting Research Papers, pp. 359–411 (Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense).
   Google Scholar
• Post, Stephen G. (2004). Encyclopedia of Bioethics (New York: Macmillan Reference USA).
   Google Scholar
• Radley, David C., Finkelstein, Stan N. & Stafford, Randall S. (2006) Off-Label Prescribing among Office-Based Physicians, Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(9), pp. 1021–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettig, Richard. (1990) Military Use of Drugs Not Yet Approved by the FDA for CW/BW Defense: Lessons from the Gulf War (Santa Monica, CA: Rand Publishing).
   Google Scholar
• Schaefer, Owen G., Emanuel, Ezekiel J., & Wertheimer, Alan. (2009) The Obligation to Participate in Biomedical Research, The Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(1), pp. 67–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalala, Donna. (2000) Protecting Research Subjects: What Must Be Done, The New England Journal of Medicine, 343(11), pp. 808–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, Norain A., Civaner, Murat & Elci, Omur Cinar. (2013) Physician Involvement in Torture: An Ethical Perspective, Journal of Medical Humanities, 34(1), pp. 59–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidel, Victor W. & Levy, Barry S. (2003) Physician-Soldier: A Moral Dilemma?, in: Thomas E. Beam & Linette R. Sparacino (Eds), Military Medical Ethics, pp. 293–312 (Washington, DC: Office of The Surgeon General, Department of the Army, USA).
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Jennifer. (2012) Advancing Ethical Research Practices in the Military, The Health Lawyer, 24(4), pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Somerson, Mark D. (2001) Church Blessed Germ Experiments: Army's Biological Warfare Research Used Seventh-Day Adventist Volunteers, Columbus Dispatch, p. 1A, November 8.
   Google Scholar
• SSCVA (Staff of Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs). (1994) 103rd Congress. Is Military Research Hazardous to Veterans' Health? Lessons Spanning Half a Century (Committee Print 103-97, 1994), 5, 36, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.gulfweb.org/bigdoc/rockrep.cfm; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Health & Human Services. (1979) The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of the Army. (2006) US Army Field Manual FM 5-19 (Fort Belvoir, VA: Army Publishing Directorate).
   Google Scholar
• US Navy. (2000) Performance Maintenance during Continuous Flight Operations, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/navy/misc/NAVMEDP-6410.pdf; Internet.
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. (1990) Informed Consent for Human Drugs and Biologics; Determination that Informed Consent is Not Feasible, 55 Federal Register 52814, December 21 (Washington, DC: G.P.O).
   Google Scholar
• US Government Printing Office. (1949) Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremburg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).
   Google Scholar
• Williams, John R. (2008) The Declaration of Helsinki and Public Health, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 86(8), pp 650–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfendale, Jessica & Clarke, Steve. (2008) Paternalism, Consent, and the Use of Experimental Drugs in the Military, Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33(4), pp. 337–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wykoff, Randolph E. (1998) Medical, Chemical, and Biological Warfare Preparedness, Statement before the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, accessed 4 December 2014, available at: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Testimony/ucm115125.htm; Internet.
   Google Scholar