Permit Trading and Stability of International Climate Agreements

References

• Babiker, Mustafa H., John M. Reilly, Monika Mayer, Richard S. Eckaus, Ian S. Wing, and Robert C. Hyman (2001), “The MIT emissions prediction and policy analysis (EPPA) model: Revisions, sensitivities and comparisons results”, MIT Report No. 41, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, Scott (1994), “Self-enforcing international environmental agreements”, Oxford Economic Papers 46: 804–78.
   Google Scholar
• Böhringer, Christoph, Glenn W. Harrison and Thomas F. Rutherford (2002), “Sharing the burden of carbon abatement in the European Union”, in C. Böhringer and A. Löschel, eds., Empirical Modelling of the Economy and the Environment, Heidelberg, ZEW.
   Google Scholar
• Bosello, Francesco, Barbara Buchner, and Carlo Carraro (2003), “Equity, development, and climate change control”, Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 601–11.
   Google Scholar
• Botteon, Michele, and Carlo Carraro (1997), “Burden-sharing and coalition stability in environmental negotiations with asymmetric countries”, in C. Carraro, ed., International Environmental Negotiations: Strategic Policy Issues, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Carraro, Carlo, and Domenico Siniscalco (1993), “Strategies for the international protection of the environment”, Journal of Public Economics 52: 309–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazorla, Marina V., and Michael A. Toman (2000), “International equity and climate change policy”, Resources for the Future-Climate Issue Brief No. 27, Washington, D.C., RFF.
   Google Scholar
• Chander, Parkash, and Henry Tulkens (1997), “The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities”, International Journal of Game Theory 26: 379–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerman, A. Denny, and Annelène Decaux (1998), “Analysis of post-Kyoto CO2 emissions trading using marginal abatement curves”, MIT Report No. 40, Cambridge, MA, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Eyckmans, Johan, and Henry Tulkens (2003), “Simulating coalitionally stable burden sharing agreements for the climate change problem”, Resource and Energy Economics 25: 299–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyckmans, Johan, and Michael Finus (2003), “Coalition formation in a global warming game: how the design of protocols affects the success of environmental treaty-making”, CLIMNEG Working Papers No. 56, Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. Forthcoming in: Natural Resource Modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Eyckmans, Johan, Stef Proost, and Erik Schokkaert (1994), “A comparison of three international agreements on carbon emission abatement”, in: E.C. van Ierland, ed., International Environmental Economics. Theories, Models and Applications to Climate Change, International Trade and Acidification, Amsterdam, Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fankhauser, Sam (1995), Valuing Climate Change, London, Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Finus, Michael (2003), “Stability and design of international environmental agreements: the case of transboundary pollution”, in H. Folmer & T. Tietenberg eds., International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 2003/4, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Finus, Michael, and Bianca Rundshagen (1998), “Toward a positive theory of coalition formation and endogenous instrumental choice in global pollution control”, Public Choice 96: 145–86.
   Google Scholar
• Finus, Michael, Juan-Carlos Altamirano-Cabrera, and Ekko van Ierland (2004), “The effect of membership rules and voting schemes on the success of international climate agreements”, Public Choice 125: 95–127.
   Google Scholar
• Germain, Marc, and Vincent van Steenberghe (2003), “Constraining equitable allocations of tradable CO2 emission quotas by acceptability”, Environmental and Resource Economics 26: 469–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoel, Michael (1992), “International environment conventions: The case of uniform reductions of emissions”, Environmental and Resource Economics 2: 141–59.
   Google Scholar
• Kverndokk, Snorre (1995) “Tradable CO2 emission permits: Initial distribution as a justice problem”, Environmental Values 4: 129–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, William D. (1994), Managing the Global Commons, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plambeck, Erica L., and Chris Hope (1996), “An updated valuation of the impacts of global warming”, Energy Policy 24: 783–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, Adam, Brandt Stevens, Jae Edmonds, and Marshal Wise (1998), “International equity and differentiation in global warming policy”, Environmental and Resource Economics 12: 25–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, Santiago and Alistair Ulph (2003), “An infinite-horizon model of dynamic membership of international environmental agreements”, Working Paper No. 57.2003, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Tol, Richard S. J. (1997), “A decision-analytic treatise of the enhanced greenhouse effect”, Ph. D. Thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Weikard, Hans-Peter, Michael Finus, and Juan-Carlos Altamirano-Cabrera (2004), “The impact of surplus sharing on the stability of international climate agreements”, Working Paper No. 99.2004, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan. Forthcoming in Oxford Economic Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, Martin L. (2001), “Gamma discounting”, American Economic Review 91: 260–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar