114
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research article

Local governments competing for the environment and green innovation-evidence from China

ORCID Icon
Article: 2358723 | Received 08 Sep 2023, Accepted 16 May 2024, Published online: 24 May 2024

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hemous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131–20. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
  • Acemoglu, D., Moscona, J., & Robinson, J. A. (2016). State capacity and American technology: Evidence from the nineteenth century. American Economic Review, 106(5), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161071
  • Alder, S., Shao, L., & Zilibotti, F. (2016). Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(4), 305–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-016-9131-x
  • Böcher, M. (2012). A theoretical framework for explaining the choice of instruments in environmental policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 16, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.03.012
  • Chen, W., Zhu, Y., He, Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). The effect of local government debt on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 73, 101760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2022.101760
  • Czarnitzki, D., Hanel, P., & Rosa, J. M. (2011). Evaluating the impact of R&D tax credits on innovation: A microeconometric study on Canadian firms. Research Policy, 40(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.017
  • Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roy, S., & Wheeler, D. (2001). Environmental regulation and development: A cross-country empirical analysis. Oxford Development Studies, 29(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810125568
  • Deng, Y., You, D., & Wang, J. (2019). Optimal strategy for enterprises’ green technology innovation from the perspective of political competition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.248
  • DiLiddo, G., Magazzino, C., & Porcelli, F. (2018). Government size, decentralization and growth: Empirical evidence from Italian regions. Applied Economics, 50(25), 2777–2791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1409417
  • Frondel, M., Horbach, J., & Rennings, K. (2007). End‐of‐pipe or cleaner production? An empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(8), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.496
  • Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403–1448. http://doi.org/10.3386/w13290
  • Jiang, Z., Xu, C., & Zhou, J. (2023). Government environmental protection subsidies, environmental tax collection, and green innovation: Evidence from listed enterprises in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 4627–4641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22538-3
  • Kis-Katos, K., & Sjahrir, B. S. (2017). The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(2), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2017.03.003
  • Konisky, D. M. (2007). Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: Is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00285.x
  • Kunce, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2008). Efficient decentralized fiscal and environmental policy: A dual purpose Henry George tax. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.08.004
  • Li, G., Li, X., & Huo, L. (2023). Digital economy, spatial spillover and industrial green innovation efficiency: Empirical evidence from China. Heliyon, 9(1), e12875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12875
  • Liu, C. Y., Xin, L., & Li, J. Y. (2022). Environmental regulation and manufacturing carbon emissions in China: A new perspective on local government competition. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(24), 36351–36375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18041-w
  • Liu, L., Zhao, Z., Su, B., Ng, T. S., Zhang, M., & Qi, L. (2021). Structural breakpoints in the relationship between outward foreign direct investment and green innovation: An empirical study in China. Energy Economics, 103, 105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105578
  • Lo Re, M., Veglianti, E., Parente, F., Monarca, U., & Magazzino, C. (2023). Economic network dynamics: A structural analysis of the international connectivity of Chinese manufacturing firms. Journal of Economic Studies, 50(8), 1585–1600. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-10-2022-0531
  • Magazzino, C. (2023). Ecological footprint, electricity consumption, and economic growth in China: Geopolitical risk and natural resources governance. Empirical Economics, 66(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-023-02460-4
  • Magazzino, C., Toma, P., Fusco, G., Valente, D., & Petrosillo, I. (2022). Renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth: The greener the richer? Ecological Indicators, 139, 108912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108912
  • Mele, M., & Magazzino, C. (2020). A machine learning analysis of the relationship among iron and steel industries, air pollution, and economic growth in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123293
  • Nie, Y., Wan, K., Wu, F., Zou, W., & Chang, T. (2022). Local government competition, development zones and urban green innovation: An empirical study of Chinese cities. Applied Economics Letters, 29(16), 1509–1514. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2021.1942426
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Breitenbach, M. C. (2021). Estimating the trade-environmental quality relationship in SADC with a dynamic heterogeneous panel model. African Review of Economics and Finance, 13(1), 113–165.
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Muchapondwa, E. (2023). Achieving green environment in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa economies: Do composite risk index, green innovation, and environmental policy stringency matter? Sustainable Development, 31(5), 3468–3489. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2597
  • Udeagha, M. C., & Ngepah, N. (2023). Towards climate action and UN sustainable development goals in BRICS economies: Do export diversification, fiscal decentralisation and environmental innovation matter? International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 15(1), 172–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2023.2222264
  • Wang, X., Li, J., Song, R., & Li, J. (2022). 350 cities of China exhibited varying degrees of carbon decoupling and green innovation synergy. Energy Reports, 8, 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.060
  • Xu, Y., Ge, W., Liu, G., Su, X., Zhu, J., Yang, C., Yang, X., & Ran, Q. (2023). The impact of local government competition and green technology innovation on economic low-carbon transition: New insights from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(9), 23714–23735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23857-1
  • Xu, X., Jing, R., & Lu, F. (2022). Environmental regulation, corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure and enterprise green innovation: Evidence from listed companies in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14771. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214771
  • Yang, T., Liao, H., & Wei, Y. M. (2020). Local government competition on setting emission reduction goals. Science of the Total Environment, 745, 141002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141002
  • Yu, X., Wan, K., & Du, Q. (2023). Can carbon market policies achieve a “point-to-surface” effect?—quasi-experimental evidence from China. Energy Policy, 183, 113803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113803
  • Zhang, T., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. Journal of Public Economics, 67(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(97)00057-1