Bad News: The Changing Coverage of National Leaders in Foreign Media of Western Democracies

REFERENCES

• Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. L. (2003). When news norms collide, follow the lead: New evidence for press independence. Political Communication, 20, 381–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M. (in press). Tell me who is your leader, and I will tell you who you are: Foreign leaders’ perceived personality and public attitudes toward their countries and citizenry. American Journal of Political Science.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S. R. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics, 20, 37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T. (2010). Candidate image in election campaigns: Attribute agenda setting, affective priming, and voting intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22, 204–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T. (2013). Leaders first, countries after: Mediated political personalization in the international arena. Journal of Communication, 63, 454–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerli, A., & Martín, J. D. (2004). Factors influencing destination image. Annals of Tourism Research, 31, 657–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldry, J. G., Gaertner, L., & Quinn, J. (2007). Measuring the measures: A meta-analytic investigation of the measures of outgroup homogeneity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 157–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenhausen, G. V., Kramer, G. P., & Süsser, K. (1994). Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 621–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., & Deegan, C. (1998). The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 29(1), 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, T. K. (1998). All countries not created equal to be news: World system and international communication. Communication Research, 25, 528–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26, 1091–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of strategic news on political cynicism, issue evaluations, and policy support: A two-wave experiment. Mass Communication and Society, 7, 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, M. W., Den Hartog, D. N., & Mitchelson, J. K. (2003). Research on leadership in a cross-cultural context: Making progress, and raising new questions. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 729–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, B. (2005). When less is more: Selection problems in large-N and small-N cross national comparisons. International Sociology, 20, 133–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2006). The 2004 New Hampshire democratic primary and network news. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11, 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2007). The nightly news nightmare: Television's coverage of US presidential elections, 1988-2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2010). The nightly news nightmare: Media coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988–2008. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., Lichter, S. R., & Schatz, R. (2011). International news coverage of Barack Obama as a new president. Electronic Media & Politics, 1(2), 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. (1965). The structure of foreign news: The presentation of the Congo, Cuba and Cyprus crises in four Norwegian newspapers. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64–90.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J. (2007). Were in the world is Africa? Predicting coverage of Africa by US television networks. The International Communication Gazette, 70, 41–57.
   Google Scholar
• Golan, G. J., & Yang, S.-U. (2013). Diplomat in chief? Assessing the influence of presidential evaluations on public diplomacy outcomes among foreign publics. American Behavioral Scientist, 57, 1277–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, B. E., & Horiuchi, Y. (2009). Spinning the globe? U.S. public diplomacy and foreign public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 71, 863–875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halman, L. (2009). Political values. In R. J. Dalton and H. D. Klingemann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 305–322). New York, NY: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D., & Guardino, M. (2011). The influence of foreign voices on US public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 831–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Heslop, L. A., Papadopoulos, N., Dowdles, M., Wall, M., & Compeau, D. (2004). Who controls the purse strings? A study of consumers’ and retail buyers’ reactions in America’s FTA environment. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1177–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2010). Changing mass priorities: The link between modernization and democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 8, 551–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Fadner, R. (1965). The coefficient of imbalance. In H. Lasswell, N. Leites, & Associates (Eds.), Language of politics (pp. 153–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A. & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., & Russett, B. (1996). The new politics of voting alignments in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization, 50, 629–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P. (2011). Leader, president, person: Lexical ambiguities and interpretive implications. European Journal of Communication, 26, 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, I., & Ellis, D. G. (2008). Intergroup communication as a predictor of Jewish‐Israeli agreement with integrative solutions to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict: The mediating effects of out‐group trust and guilt. Journal of Communication, 58, 490–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z., Kuperman, R. D., Terris, L., & Talmud, I. (2006). Structural equivalence and international conflict: A social networks analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50, 664–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Pizzuto, C., & Foels, R. (2002). Altering intergroup perceptions by altering prevailing mode of cognitive representation: “They look like people.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1333–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., Rozell, D., & Johnson, C. (2000). Ethnophaulisms for ethnic immigrant groups: Cognitive representation of `the minority‘ and `the foreigner‘. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3, 5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Negrine, R., & Lilleker, D. G. (2002). The professionalization of political communication: Continuities and change in media practices. European Journal of Communication, 17, 305–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau, J. L., & Mas, F. J. (2006). The influence of distance and prices on the choice of tourist destinations: The moderating role of motivations. Tourism Management, 27, 982–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye Jr., J. S. (2004). When hard power undermines soft power. New Perspectives Quarterly, 21, 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, D. L., Al Nashmi, E., Strömbäck, J., Fernandes, J., Xiang, Z., & Kim, J. Y. (2014). International coverage of the US presidential campaign: Obamamania around the world. In J. A. Hendricks & L. L. Kaid (Eds.), Techno politics in presidential campaigning: New voices, new technologies, and new voters (pp. 213–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. E. (1977). Four types of tables. Journal of Communication, 27, 67–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruigrok, N., & van Atteveldt, W. (2007). Global angling with a local angle: How U.S., British, and Dutch newspapers frame global and local terrorist attacks. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 68–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, T. W., & Häfner, M. (2003). Contrast from social stereotypes in automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 577–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, F., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Oegema, D., Utz, S., & Van Atteveldt, W. (2012). Strategic framing in the BP crisis: A semantic network analysis of associative frames. Public Relations Review, 38, 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. B. (1990). A cognitive categorization model for the study of intercultural management. Academy of Management Review, 15, 626–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57, 21–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T., Ben-Nun Bloom, P., Shenhav, S. R., & Segev, E. (2013). The conditional nature of value-based proximity between countries: Strategic implications for mediated public diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(9), 1256–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S. R. (2013). Political culture congruence and political stability: Revisiting the congruence hypothesis with prospect theory. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 57(2), 232–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheafer, T., Shenhav, S. R., Takens, J., & van Atteveldt, W. (2014). Relative political and value proximity in mediated public diplomacy: The effect of state-level homophily on international frame building. Political Communication, 31, 149–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: Towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies, 32, 519–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P. J., Lee, J. H., Han, G., & Cohen, A. A. (2007). Proximity and scope as news values. In E. Devereux (Ed.), Media studies: Key issues and debates (pp. 231–248). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sigelman, L., Sigelman, C. K., & Walkosz, B. J. (1992). The public and the paradox of leadership: An experimental analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 366–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D. (1988). Reconstructing the Correlates of War dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985. International Interactions, 14, 115–132.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. D., Bremer, S., & Stuckey, J. (1972). Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820–1965. In B. Russett (Ed.), Peace, war, and numbers (pp. 19–48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, N. (2009). Persuader-in-chief: Global opinion and public diplomacy in the age of Obama. Ann Arbor, MI: Nimble Books.
   Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & McAdams, S. (2015). News, politics, and negativity. Political Communication, 32(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., Young, L., & Balmas, M. (2015). Bad news or mad news? Sentiment scoring of negativity, fear, and anger in news content. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 659, 108–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics, 68, 372–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, J.-B., Batra, R., & Alden, D. L. (2003). How perceived brand globalness creates brand value. Journal of International Business Studies, 34, 53–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13, 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Ruigrok, N. (2008). Parsing, semantic networks, and political authority using syntactic analysis to extract semantic relations from Dutch newspaper articles. Political Analysis, 16, 428–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Boumans, J. W. (2011). Changes in political news coverage: Personalization, conflict and negativity in British and Dutch newspapers. In K. Brants & K. Voltmer (Eds.), Political communication in postmodern democracy challenging the primacy of politics (pp. 92–110). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., Van Aelst, P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Covering the US presidential election in Western Europe: A cross-national comparison. Acta Politica, 45(4), 444–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, E. (2000). Clashes in the assembly. International Organization, 54, 185–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., & Golan, G. J. (2010). Coverage of foreign elections in the United States. In G. Golan, T.J. Johnson, & W. Wanta (Eds.), International media communication in a global age, (pp. 110–124). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. D. (2000). The systemic determinants of international news coverage: A comparison of 38 countries. Journal of Communication, 50, 110–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication, 29, 205–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar