How Young, Uninsured Americans Respond to News Coverage of Obamacare: An Experimental Test of an Affective Mediation Model

REFERENCES

• Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 163–178. doi:10.1177/1464884911427799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, S., & Cozma, R. (2011). Health care reform coverage improves in 2009–10 over Clinton era. Newspaper Research Journal, 32(3), 24–39. doi:10.1177/073953291103200303
   Google Scholar
• Ahern, L., Connolly-Ahern, C., & Hoewe, J. (2016). Worldviews, issue knowledge, and the pollution of a local science information environment. Science Communication, 38(2), 228–250. doi:10.1177/1075547016636388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust, C. F., & Zillmann, D. (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in television news on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 787–803. doi:10.1177/107769909607300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camaj, L. (2014). Need for orientation, selective exposure, and attribute agenda-setting effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17(5), 689–712. doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.835424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. H., & Keeling, R. P. (2000). Men, gender, and health: Toward an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of American College Health, 48(6), 243–246. doi:10.1080/07448480009596265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., & Lawlor, A. (2016). Media in the policy process: Using framing and narratives to understand policy influences. Review of Policy Research, 33(5), 472–491. doi:10.1111/ropr.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. R. (2006). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. London, UK: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Del Vicario, M., Vivaldo, G., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports, 6, 37825. doi:10.1038/srep37825
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2007). Self-report measures of discrete emotions. In R. A. Reynolds, R. Woods, & J. D. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of research on electronic surveys and measurements (pp. 330–333). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J., & Lawrence, R. G. (2015). What predicts the game frame? Media ownership, electoral context, and campaign news. Political Communication, 32(1), 43–60. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.880975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30(4), 359–386. doi:10.1177/0093650203253369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2006). The 2004 New Hampshire democratic primary and network news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(1), 53–63. doi:10.1177/1081180X05283551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, C., & Glaser, J. (2010). Voter affect and the 2008 U.S. presidential election: Hope and race mattered. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10(1), 262–275. doi:10.1111/j.1530-2415.2010.01206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, G., Lin, H., Walker, C., Lee, M., Currie, J. M., Allgeyer, R., … Massey, K. (2016). Parent mentors and insuring uninsured children: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 137(4), e20153519. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R., & Bem, S. (2000). Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701–723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopmann, D. N., Shehata, A., & Strömbäck, J. (2015). Contagious media effects: How media use and exposure to game-framed news influence media trust. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 776–798. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1022190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175. doi:10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, E. E., Bengs, C., Danielsson, U., Lehti, A., & Hammarström, A. (2009). Gaps between patients, media, and academic medicine in discourses on gender and depression: A metasynthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 19(5), 633–644. doi:10.1177/1049732309333920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. (2016, September 29). Key facts about the uninsured population. Retrieved from http://kff.org/uninsured/fact-sheet/key-facts-about-the-uninsured-population/
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruikemeier, S., & Shehata, A. (2016). News media use and political engagement among adolescents: An analysis of virtuous circles using panel data. Political Communication, 1–22. doi:10.1080/10584609.2016.1174760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. M., & Addis, M. E. (2005). Male gender role conflict and patterns of help seeking in Costa Rica and the United States. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(3), 155. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.6.3.155
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. G. (2000). Game-framing the issues: Tracking the strategy frame in public policy news. Political Communication, 17, 93–114. doi:10.1080/105846000198422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., Bos, L., & Vliegenthart, R. (2015). The mediating role of emotions: News framing effects on opinions about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 812–838. doi:10.1177/1077699015596338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefevere, J., De Swert, K., & Walgrave, S. (2012). Effects of popular exemplars in television news. Communication Research, 39(1), 103–119. doi:10.1177/0093650210387124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 115–137. doi:10.1002/bdm.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., MacKuen, M., & Neuman, W. R. (2011). Parsimony and complexity: Developing and testing theories of affective intelligence. Political Psychology, 32(2), 323–336. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2006). The need for orientation towards news media: Revising and validating a classic concept. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(4), 422–444. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motel, S. (2015). Opinions on Obamacare remain divided along party lines as Supreme Court hears new challenge. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/03/04/opinions-on-obamacare-remain-divided-along-party-lines-as-supreme-court-hears-new-challenge/
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. (2008). How the mass media divide us. In P. Nivola & D. Brady (Eds.), Red and blue nation? (pp. 223–263). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myrick, J. G. (2015). The role of emotions in preventative health communication. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2010). The case for emphasizing discrete emotions in communication research. Communication Monographs, 77(2), 153–159. doi:10.1080/03637751003790444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2016). United States health care reform: Progress to date and next steps. Journal of the American Medical Association, 316(5), 525–532. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.9797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of the Legislative Counsel. (2010). Compilation of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Retrieved from http://housedocs.house.gov/energycommerce/ppacacon.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostfeld, M., & Mutz, D. (2014). Revisiting the effects of case reports in the news. Political Communication, 31(1), 53–72. doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.799106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M. T., & Isbell, L. M. (2010). How I vote depends on how I feel: The differential impact of anger and fear on political information processing. Psychological Science, 21(4), 548–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 18001 et seq. (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2014). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K. Kenski & K. Hall Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shehata, A. (2014). Game frames, issue frames, and mobilization: Disentangling the effects of frame exposure and motivated news attention on political cynicism and engagement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(2), 157–177. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–769. doi:10.2307/3694247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Beckman, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001a). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367. doi:10.1080/10584600152647083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Buhr, T. A., & Beckman, M. N. (2001b). When the frame is the game: Revisiting the impact of ‘strategic’ campaign coverage on citizens’ information retention. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(1), 93–112. doi:10.1177/107769900107800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the Internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcieszak, M., Bimber, B., Feldman, L., & Stroud, N. J. (2015). Partisan news and political participation: Exploring mediated relationships. Political Communication, 33(2), 241–260. doi:10.1080/10584609.2015.1051608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H. B. (2000). Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar