Framing Risk with Numbers: The Framing Effects of Risk Assertions and Number Formats on Emotions and Risk Perceptions

References

• Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–1111. doi:10.2307/1960858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase, G. L. (2002). Which statistical formats facilitate what decisions? The perception and influence of different statistical information formats. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 381–401. doi:10.1002/bdm.421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. (2013). Positive psychology: The science of happiness and human strengths (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27(2), 221–239. doi:10.1177/1075547005281473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(3), 98–101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Emotional reactions to the economy: I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore. American Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 50–78. doi:10.2307/2111294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & McDermott, R. (2008). Emotion and the framing of risky choice. Political Behavior, 30(3), 297–321. doi:10.1007/s11109-008-9056-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, D. F., Blackman, S., & Salzman, B. (1989). Using statistical risk information to assess oral contraceptive safety. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 251–260. doi:10.1002/acp.2350030305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, E. J., Payne, J. W., & Bettman, J. R. (1988). Information displays and preference reversals. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(1), 1–21. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(88)90017-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. (1989). Model modification in covariance structure analysis: Application of the expected parameter change statistic. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 285–305. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A. (2016). Mediation. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, B. R., Redlawsk, D. P., & Sanborn, H. (2011). Framing labels and immigration policy attitudes in the Iowa caucuses:“Trying to out-Tancredo Tancredo”. Political Behavior, 33(3), 433–454. doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. doi:10.1177/0093650213514599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., Weber, P., & Sommer, K. (2015). Beyond cognitive framing processes: Anger mediates the effects of responsibility framing on the preference for punitive measures. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 259–279. doi:10.1111/jcom.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204. doi:10.1177/1077699011430064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., Schuck, A. R., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications, 38(2), 189–209. doi:10.1515/commun-2013-0011
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Gonzalez, R. M., Small, D. A., & Fischhoff, B. (2003). Effects of fear and anger on perceived risks of terrorism: A national field experiment. Psychological Science, 14(2), 144–150. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.01433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. doi:10.1080/026999300402763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 3–28. doi:10.1080/02699938708408361
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2016). A revisionist perspective on framing effects. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E. (2013). Political psychology: Neuroscience, genetics and politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. (2015). News frames and national security: Covering Big Brother. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. M. (2007). Examining the mediators of agenda setting: A new experimental paradigm reveals the role of emotions. Political Psychology, 28(6), 689–717. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. doi:10.1177/0093650202250881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1992). Best laid schemes: The psychology of the emotions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K., Keltner, D., & Jenkins, J. M. (2006). Understanding emotions (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E., Västfjäll, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1988). Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice. American Political Science Review, 82(3), 719–736. doi:10.2307/1962487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J. (2001). A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating research, theory, and applications. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 68–91). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–1284. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1990). Feeling as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 527–561). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F. (2004). Chronic accessibility and individual cognitions: Examining the effects of message frames in political advertisements. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 123–137. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02617.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. (1972). From Shakespeare to Simon: Speculations—and some evidence—about man’s ability to process information. Research Bulletin, 12(2), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Ellsworth, P. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Kirby, L. (2000). Consequences require antecedents: Toward a process model of emotion elicitation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 83–106). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. T., & Johnston, V. S. (1995). Perceived social context and risk preference: A re-examination of framing effects in a life-death decision problem. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 8(4), 279–293. doi:10.1002/bdm.3960080405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar