Direct and Indirect Effects of Involvement on Hostile Media Perceptions in the Context of the Refugee Crisis in Germany and Switzerland

References

• Ariyanto, A., Hornsey, M. J., & Gallois, C. (2007). Group allegiances and perceptions of media bias: Taking into account both the perceiver and the source. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(2), 266–279. doi:10.1177/1368430207074733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlt, D., & Wolling, J. (2016). The refugees: Threatening or beneficial? Exploring the effects of positive and negative attitudes and communication on hostile media perceptions. Global Media Journal, 6(1), 1–21. URN:nbn:de:gbv:547-201600309.
   Google Scholar
• Arpan, L. M., & Nabi, R. L. (2011). Exploring anger in the hostile media process: Effects on news preferences and source evaluation. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 5–22. doi:10.1177/107769901108800101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlai, M., Fähnrich, B., Griessler, C., & Rhomberg, M. (2017). The migrant crisis: European perspectives and national discourses. Berlin, Germany: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Barnidge, M., Sayre, B., & Rojas, H. (2015). Perceptions of the media and the public and their effects on political participation in Colombia. Mass Communication and Society, 18(3), 259–280. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.923463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge. (2017). Asylgeschäftsbericht 12/2016 [Asylum Annual Report 12/2016.]. Retrieved from http://www.bamf.de/SharedDocs/Anlagen/DE/Downloads/Infothek/Statistik/Asyl/201612-statistik-anlage-asyl-geschaeftsbericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
   Google Scholar
• Cho, J. (2013). Campaign tone, political affect, and communicative engagement. Journal of Communication, 63(6), 1130–1152. doi:10.1111/jcom.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. C. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 United Parcel Service Strike. Political Communication, 19(4), 423–436. doi:10.1080/10584600290109988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Beck, P. A., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Partisan cues and the media: Information flows in the 1992 presidential election. The American Political Science Review, 92(1), 111–126. doi:10.2307/2585932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esses, V. M., Dovidio, J. F., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Social Survey. (2015). Round 7 module on attitudes towards immigration and their antecedents - question design final module in template. London, UK: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys. Retrieved from https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round7/questionnaire/ESS7_immigration_final_module_template.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., & Shah, D. V. (2003). The impact of individual and interpersonal factors on perceived news media bias. Political Psychology, 24(1), 101–117. doi:10.1111/0162-895X.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L., Hart, P. S., Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., & Roser-Renouf, C. (2015). Do hostile media perceptions lead to action? The role of hostile media perceptions, political efficacy, and ideology in predicting climate change activism. Communication Research, 44(8), 1099–1124. doi:10.1177/0093650214565914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 165–180. doi:10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2014). How pervasive are perceptions of bias? Exploring judgments of media bias in financial news. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 26(4), 543–553. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edu004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. doi:10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52(1), 177–195. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02538.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Christen, C. T., Liebhart, J. L., & Chih-Yun Chia, S. (2001). Congenial public, contrary press, and biased estimates of the climate of opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(3), 295–320. doi:10.1086/322846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Edgerly, S., Akin, H., & Broesch, J. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39(4), 439–457. doi:10.1177/0093650212441794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 449–466. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., Miller, N., & Liebhart, J. L. (2009). Assimilation and contrast in a test of the hostile media effect. Communication Research, 36(6), 747–764. doi:10.1177/0093650209346804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Schmitt, K. (2004). Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 54(1), 55–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02613.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. doi:10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of ingroup identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 535–555. doi:10.1111/jcom.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. S., Binder, A. R., Becker, A. B., Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The role of perceptions of media bias in general and issue-specific political participation. Mass Communication & Society, 14(3), 343–374. doi:10.1080/15205436.2010.491933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölig, S., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Germany. Retrieved from http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf?x89475
   Google Scholar
• Holtz-Bacha, C., & Zeh, R. (2016). Tweeting to the press? Effects of political Twitter activity on offline media in the 2013 German election campaign. In R. Davis, C. Holtz-Bacha, & M. Just (Eds.), Twitter and elections around the world: Campaigning in 140 characters or less (pp. 27–42). London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huckfeldt, R. R., Johnson, P. E., & Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement. The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huge, M., & Glynn, C. J. (2010). Hostile media and the campaign trail: Perceived media bias in the race for governor. Journal of Communication, 60(1), 165–181. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Pan, Z., & Sun, Y. (2008). Influence of hostile media perception on willingness to engage in discursive activities: An examination of mediating role of media indignation. Media Psychology, 11(1), 76–97. doi:10.1080/15213260701813454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2009). Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information. Communication Research, 36(3), 426–448. doi:10.1177/0093650209333030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Mothes, C., Johnson, B. K., Westerwick, A., & Donsbach, W. (2015). Political online information searching in Germany and the United States: Confirmation bias, source credibility, and attitude impacts. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 489–511. doi:10.1111/jcom.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and Adaption. Oxford, UK/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, -T.-T. (2005). The liberal media myth revisited: An examination of factors influencing perceptions of media bias. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49(1), 43–64. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4901_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matthes, J. (2013). The affective underpinnings of hostile media perceptions: Exploring the distinct effects of affective and cognitive involvement. Communication Research, 40(3), 360–387. doi:10.1177/0093650211420255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., & Beyer, A. (2017). Toward a cognitive-affective process model of hostile media perceptions: A multi-country structural equation modeling approach. Communication Research, 44(8), 1075–1098. doi:10.1177/0093650215594234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeever, B. W., Riffe, D., & Carpentier, F. D. (2012). Perceived hostile media bias, presumed media influence, and opinions about immigrants and immigration. Southern Communication Journal, 77(5), 420–437. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2012.691602
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Moy, P. (1999). Community, communication, and participation: The role of mass media and interpersonal discussion in local political participation. Political Communication, 16(3), 315–336. doi:10.1080/105846099198659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting Nnetworks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247. doi:10.1177/0093650202250881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, K. R. (2018). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Retrieved from http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf?x89475
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, P. B., & Carr, C. T. (2018). Masspersonal communication: A model bridging the mass-interpersonal divide. New Media & Society, 20(3), 1161–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444816686104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perloff, R. M. (2015). A three-decade retrospective on the hostile media effect. Mass Communication and Society, 18(6), 701-729. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1051234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. (1991). The emotions. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung. (2016). Meinungen zur aktuellen Flüchtlingssituation in Europa und Deutschland (Mai 2015)[Attitudes toward the actual refugee situation in Europe (May 2015)]. GESIS Datenarchiv, Köln, Germany. ZA6609 Datenfile Version 1.0.0. Berlin, Germany. doi:10.4232/1.12432
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2010). You’ve either got it or you don’t? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. The Journal of Politics, 72(3), 747–766. doi:10.1017/s0022381610000149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., Barnidge, M., & Abril, E. P. (2016). Egocentric publics and corrective action. Communication and the Public, 1(1), 27–38. doi:10.1177/2057047315619421
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21(3), 315–338. doi:10.1080/10584600490481389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O., & Freedman, J. L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194–213. doi:10.1086/267513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staatssekretariat für Migration. (2017). Asylstatistik 2016 [Asylum statisctics 2016]. Retrieved from https://www.sem.admin.ch/dam/data/sem/publiservice/statistik/asylstatistik/2016/stat-q4-2016-kommentar-d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statista. (2017). Number of internet users who read posts on Twitter in Germany from 2013 to 2015, by frequency (in millions). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/430555/internet-twitter-usage-germany/
   Google Scholar
• Strömback, J., & Shehata, A. (2010). Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest. European Journal of Political Research, 49(5), 575–597. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartakovsky, E., & Walsh, S. D. (2016). Testing a new theoretical model for attitudes toward immigrants: The case of social workers’ attitudes toward asylum seekers in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47(1), 72–96. doi:10.1177/0022022115613860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2015). Public spheres in interaction: Comment sections of news websites as counterpublic spaces. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 465–488. doi:10.1111/jcom.12156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsfati, Y. (2007). Hostile media perceptions, presumed media influence, and minority alienation: The case of Arabs in Israel. Journal of Communication, 57(4), 632–651. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udris, L., & Eisenegger, M. (2018). Switzerland. Retrieved from http://media.digitalnewsreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/digital-news-report-2018.pdf?x89475
   Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577–585. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirth, W. (2006). Involvement. In J. Bryant & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Psychology of entertainment (pp. 199–213). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar