Narrative Engagement and Vicarious Interaction with Multiple Characters

References

• Adachi, P. J., Ryan, R. M., Frye, J., McClurg, D., & Rigby, C. S. (2018). “I can’t wait for the next episode!” Investigating the motivational pull of television dramas through the lens of self-determination theory. Motivation Science, 4(1), 78–94.
   Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O’Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychologist, 1(1), 3–38. doi:10.1007/BF01326548
   Google Scholar
• Bond, B. J., & Calvert, S. L. (2014). Parasocial breakup among young children in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 8, 474–490.
   Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Ditman, T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2011). Better you than I: Perspectives and emotion simulation during narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 659–666. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.559160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunyé, T. T., Mahoney, C. R., & Taylor, H. A. (2010). Moving through imagined space: Mentally simulating locomotion during spatial description reading. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 110–124. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fictionality and perceived realism in experiencing stories: A model of narrative comprehension and engagement. Communication Theory, 18(2), 255–280. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, R. F., Ruggels, W. L., Jackson, K. M., & Hefner, M. B. (1973). Application of signaled stopping technique to communication research. In P. Clarke (Ed.), New models for mass communication research (pp. 15–43). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Caughey, J. L. (1978). Artificial social relations in modern America. American Quarterly, 30(1), 70–89. doi:10.2307/2712280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charts, M. (2013). U.S. consumers seen behind the curve in live social chatter about TV. Retrieved from http://www.marketingcharts.com/wp/television/us-consumers-seen-behind-the-curve-in-live-social-chatter-about-tv-28006/
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., Soderlund, T., Cole, J., Gadol, E., Kute, M., Myers, M., & Weihing, J. (2004). Cognitions associated with attempts to empathize: How do we imagine the perspective of another? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1625–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self-awareness. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, G. J., Streeter, S. K., & Engelbrecht, J. D. (1983). Television characters as significant others and the process of vicarious role taking. Journal of Family Issues, 4(2), 367–384. doi:10.1177/019251383004002007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher-Kiefer, R. (1996). Encoding differences between bridging and predictive inferences. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 225–246. doi:10.1080/01638539609544974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, S. L., Koppen, M., Noordman, L. G. M., & Vonk, W. (2003). Modeling knowledge-based inferences in story comprehension. Cognitive Science, 27, 875–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1990). Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In D. A. Balota, G. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 465–485). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gavelek, J. R., & Raphael, T. E. (1985). Metacognition, instruction, and the role of questioning activities. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley & G. K. MacKinnon (Eds.), Metacognition, cognition and human performance (pp. 105–118). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M. A. (1995). The structure-building framework: What it is, what it might also be, and why. In B. K. Britton & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Models of text understanding (pp. 289–311). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. P., Pingree, S., Fitzpatrick, M. A., Thompson, M., & Bauman, I. (1991). Implications of concurrent measures of viewer behavior. Human Communication Research, 17(3), 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, C. (1996). Children’s wishful identification and parasocial interaction with favorite television characters. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 40, 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, N. N. (1975). Five readers reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Honeycutt, J. M., Choi, C. W., & DeBerry, J. R. (2009). Communication apprehension and imagined interactions. Communication Research Reports, 26(3), 228–236. doi:10.1080/08824090903074423
   Google Scholar
• Horton, D., & Strauss, A. (1957). Interaction in audience-participation shows. The American Journal of Sociology, 62(6), 579–587. doi:10.1086/222106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. M. Q., & Patnoe-Woodley, P. D. (2016). Exploring the influence of parasocial relationships and experiences on radio listeners’ consumer behaviors. Communication Research Reports, 33(1), 40–46. doi:10.1080/08824096.2015.1117440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students’ comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(4), 366–381. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(89)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1991). Improving lecture comprehension: Effects of a metacognitive strategy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 331–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 72–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2012). Starting from scratch and building brick by brick in comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40(5), 812–826. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0179-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T. (2002). Predictive inference generation as a function of working memory capacity and causal text constraints. Discourse, Processes, 34(3), 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22(3), 199–224. doi:10.1080/01638539609544973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Taylor, H. A., & Kim, H. J. J. (2005). When goals collide: Monitoring the goals of multiple characters. Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1357–1367. doi:10.3758/BF03193368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., & Dimmick, J. (2003). The conceptualization and measurement of diversity. Communication Research, 30(1), 60–79. doi:10.1177/0093650202239026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., Lin, S.-F., Anderegg, J. J., Na, K., & Dale, K. R. (2014). Time, tweets, uses, and gratifications: The dynamic nature of television viewing orientations. Paper presented to the annual conference of International Communication Association, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, D. G., Sarge, M., Lin, S.-F., Collier, J., & Potocki, B. (2015). A role for the self: Media content as triggers for autobiographical memories. Communication Research, 42(1), 3–29. doi:10.1177/0093650212464771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuail, D., Blumler, J. G., & Browmn, J. (1972). The television audience: A revised perspective. In D. McQuail (Ed.), Sociology of mass communication (pp. 135–165). Middlesex, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Niehaus, J., & Young, R. M. (2014). Cognitive models of discourse comprehension for narrative generation. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(4), 561–582.
   Google Scholar
• Noh, S., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2009). Age differences in tracking characters during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 37(6), 769–778. doi:10.3758/MC.37.6.769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. C. (1986). The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1995). A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1), 53–74. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (1999). Meeting of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5), 439–454. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00011-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (2011). Character, action, incident: Mental models of people and their doings. In Such stuff as dreams: The psychology of fiction (pp. 81–106). West Sussex,UK. doi:10.1002/9781119970910.ch4
   Google Scholar
• Otero, J. (2009). Question generation and anomaly detection in texts. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 47-59). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Provalis Research. (2010). WordStat. Montreal, Canada: Author. Version 6.1) [Computer Software].
   Google Scholar
• Riedl, M. O., & Young, R. M. (2010). Narrative planning: Balancing plot and character. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 39, 217–268. doi:10.1613/jair.2989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado, S., Nienstedt, H. W., & Schneider, L. (2014). Consensus or discussion? An analysis of plurality and consonance in coverage. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The euro crisis in the medial journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institutions (pp. 103–124). London, UK: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Rich, S., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Not all narrative shifts function equally. Journal of Memory & Cognition, 28, 1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36(6), 1144–1150. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, E. S. H. (2008). Entertainment is emotion: The functional architecture of the entertainment experience. Media Psychology, 11(1), 28–51. doi:10.1080/15213260701853161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therriault, D. J., & Rinck, M. (2007). Multidimensional situation models. In F. Schmalhofer & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Higher level language processes in the brain: Inference and comprehension processes (pp. 311–327). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, Q., & Hoffner, C. A. (2010). Parasocial interaction with liked, neutral, and disliked characters on a popular TV series. Mass Communication and Society, 13(3), 250–269. doi:10.1080/15205430903296051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todd, A. R., Simpson, A. J., & Tamir, D. I. (2016). Active perspective taking induces flexible use of self-knowledge during social inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(22), 1583–1588. doi:10.1037/xge0000237
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Visch, V., & Tan, E. (2008). Narrative versus style: Effect of genre-typical events versus genre-typical filmic realizations on film viewers’ genre recognition. Poetics, 36, 301–315. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorderer, P., Knobloch, S., & Schramm, H. (2001). Does entertainment suffer from interactivity? The impact of watching an interactive TV movie on viewer’s experience of entertainment. Media Psychology, 3(4), 343–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. V., Saltzberg, J. A., & Goldsamt, L. A. (1990). Does affect induce self-focused attention? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5), 899–908. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In P. Vorderer, W. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations (pp. 199–231). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar