Effects of Frame Repetition Through Cues in the Online Environment

References

• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “Nasty Effect:” Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 373–387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316. doi:10.1080/01957470290055510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A., & Iyengar, S. (2016). The end of framing as we know it … and the future of media effects. Mass Communication & Society, 19(1), 7–23. doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T, & Petty, R. E. (1989). Effects of message repetition on argument processing, recall, and persuasion. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 3–12. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing public opinion in competitive democracies. American Political Science Review, 101(04), 637–655. doi:10.1017/s0003055407070554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2010). Dynamic public opinion: Communication effects over time. American Political Science Review, 104, 663–680. doi:10.1017/S0003055410000493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2013). Counterframing effects. The Journal of Politics, 75(1), 1–16. doi:10.1017/S0022381612000837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claypool, H. M., Mackie, D. M., Garcia-Marques, T., Mcintosh, A., & Udall, A. (2004). The effects of personal relevance and repetition on persuasive processing. Social Cognition, 22(3), 310–335. doi:10.1521/soco.22.3.310.35970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, R. (2010). Framing the pictures in our heads: Exploring the framing and agenda-setting effects of visual images. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 232–261). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256. doi:10.1023/A:1015006907312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., & Leeper, T. J. (2012). Learning more from political communication experiments: Pretreatment and its effects. American Journal of Political Science, 56(4), 875–896. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00582.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E., & Slothuus, R. (2013). How elite partisan polarization affects public opinion formation. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 57–59. doi:10.1017/S0003055412000500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahmy, S., Kelly, J. D., & Kim, Y. S. (2007). What Katrina revealed: A visual analysis of the hurricane coverage by news wires and U.S. newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 84(3), 546–561. doi:10.1177/107769900708400309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, K., & D’Ambrosio, L. (2004). Framing emotional response. Political Psychology, 25(1), 1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00354.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors. Human Communication Research, 41, 557–576. doi:10.1111/hcre.12059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. doi:10.1177/0093650213514599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., Weber, P., & Sommer, K. (2015). Beyond cognitive framing processes: Anger mediates the effects of responsibility framing on the preference for punitive measures. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 259–279. doi:10.1111/jcom.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). What a difference a day makes? The effects of repetitive and competitive news framing over time. Communication Research, 40(2), 147–175. doi:10.1177/0093650212470688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., Liu, J., Choung, H., & McLeod, D. M. (2018). Framing risk with numbers: The framing effects of risk assertions and number formats on emotions and risk perceptions. Mass Communication & Society. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1536790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Lee, B., McLeod, D. M., & Choung, H. (2018). Framing obesity: Effects of obesity labeling and prevalence statistics on public perceptions. Health Education & Behavior. doi:10.1177/1090198118788907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Scheufele, D. A. (2016). A revisionist perspective on framing effects. In W. R. Thompson (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.48
   Google Scholar
• McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187. doi:10.1086/267990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2015). News framing and national security: Covering big brother. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91(3), 567–583. doi:10.2307/2952075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. doi:10.1023/a:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55–75. doi:10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.5.847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought - The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17(4), 4–34. doi:10.1177/1529100615623267
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5(3), 161–200. doi:10.1080/02699939108411034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., McLeod, D. M., Rojas, H., Cho, J., Wagner, M. W., & Friedland, L. A. (2017). Revising the communication mediation model for a new political communication ecology. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 491–504. doi:10.1111/hcre.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795–809. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. (2008). More than weighting cognitive importance: A dual-process model of issue framing effects. Political Psychology, 29(1), 1–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance and paticipant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M. H., Liu, J., & McLeod, D. M. (2019). Pathways to news sharing: Issue frame perceptions and the likelihood of sharing. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 201–210. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M. J. Metzger & A. J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 72–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Trost, M. R., Maass, A., & Kenrick, D. T. (1992). Minority influence: Personal relevance biases cognitive processes and reverses private acceptance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(3), 234–254. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90054-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S251–S278. doi:10.1086/296365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Carr, D. J., Nytes, J. P., & Shah, D. V. (2010). Precision vs. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. Political Communication, 27(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10584600903297927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar