All the President’s Tweets: Effects of Exposure to Trump’s “Fake News” Accusations on Perceptions of Journalists, News Stories, and Issue Evaluation

REFERENCES

• Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 211–236. doi:10.1257/jep.31.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2018). Washington post fact checker poll, Nov. 30 - Dec. 10, 2018. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-fact-checker-poll-nov-30-dec-10-2018/2351/
   Google Scholar
• Appel, M., Gnambs, T., Richter, T., & Green, M. (2015). The transportation scale-short form (TS-SF). Media Psychology, 18(2), 243–266. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.987400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askenazi, D. (2018, June 20). How Americans really feel about the media. Retrieved from https://medium.com/trust-media-and-democracy/how-americans-really-feel-about-the-media-cd3265b4d416
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, E., & Wojdynski, B. W. (2015). Effects of “meaningful” entertainment on altruistic behavior: Investigating potential mediators. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59(4), 603–619. doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1093484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmas, M. (2014). When fake news becomes real: Combined exposure to multiple news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism. Communication Research, 41(3), 430–454. doi:10.1177/0093650212453600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., … Highberger, L. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 105–118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBC Trending. (2016, November 15). U.S. Election 2016: Trump’s ‘hidden’ Facebook army. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-37945486
   Google Scholar
• BBC Trending. (2018, January 22). The (almost) complete history of ‘fake news’. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-42724320.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, J., & Zillman, D. (1979). Effect of intensification of annoyance through unrelated residual excitation on substantially delayed hostile behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 470–480. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(79)90009-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2009). Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology, 12, 321–347. doi:10.1080/15213260903287259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (2004). Populism for political theorists? Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(3), 241–252. doi:10.1080/1356931042000263500
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, J. R., Bryant, J., & Zillmann, D. (1974). Enhancement of humor appreciation by transferred excitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 812–821. doi:10.1037/h0037543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cosentino, G. (2012). The comical inquisition: Striscia la Notizia and the politics of fake news on Italian Television. Popular Communication, 10, 52–65. doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638570
   Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C. (1979). Efficacy, trust, and political behavior: An attempt to resolve a lingering conceptual dilemma. American Politics Quarterly, 7, 225–239. doi:10.1177/1532673X7900700207
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 51–74. doi:10.1093/ijpor/10.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2002). In the mind’s eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 315–341). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knolwedge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., Brock, T. C., & Kaufman, G. F. (2004). Understanding media enjoyment: The role of transportation into narrative worlds. Communication Theory, 14(4), 311–327. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, M., Haigh, T., & Kozak, N. I. (2017). Stopping fake news: The work practices of peer-to-peer counter propoganda. Journalism Studies. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2017.1316681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamby, A., Brinberg, D., & Daniloski, K. (2017). Reflecting on the journey: Mechanisms in narrative persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 400–407. doi:10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323–340. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, J. (Ed.). (2007). The daily show and philosophy: Moments of Zen in the art of fake news. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D. J. (2004). Familiar phrases as peripheral persuasion cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 231–243. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.1320
   Google Scholar
• Ingram, M. (2018, September 12). Most Americans say they have lost trust in the media. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trust-in-media-down.php
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, G., Clement, S., Schaul, K., Guskin, E., Kelly, M., & Rizo, S. (2018, December 14). Trump routinely says things that aren’t true. Few Americans believe him. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/politics/political-knowledge-poll-trump-falsehoods/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f842a47f0248
   Google Scholar
• Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381–403. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_4
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. L. (2017). Election of Donald Trump and migration. Migration Letters, 14(1), 161–171. doi:10.33182/ml.v14i1.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McChesney, R. W. (2011). Foreward. In A. Amarasingam (Ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the real impacts of fake news (pp. 1–2). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
   Google Scholar
• McCredie, M. N., & Morey, L. C. (2018). Who are the turkers?: A characterization of MTurk workers using the personality assessment inventory. Assessment. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1073191118760709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J. (1999). Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66, 90–103. doi:10.1080/03637759909376464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafaraj, E., & Metaxas, P. T. (2017). The fake news spreading plague: Was it preventable? Paper presented at the WebSci ’17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science conference Troy, NY.
   Google Scholar
• New York Times Editorial Board. (2018, April 4). The true damage of Trump’s “Fake News”. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/04/opinion/trump-washington-post-amazon.html
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory & research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B. (1994). Contributions of sexual portrayals to viewers’ responses to graphic horror. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B. (2008). Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 40–61. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., Dillard, J. P., Bae, K., & Tamul, D. J. (2012). The effect of narrative news format on empathy for sitgmatized groups. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 205–224. doi:10.1177/1077699012439020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61, 984–1004. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, B. L. (2017). The age of Twitter: Donald J. Trump and the politics of debasement. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 34(1), 59–68. doi:10.1080/15295036.2016.1266686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persily, N. (2017). The 2016 U.S. Presidential election: Can democracy survive the Internet? Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 63–76. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146. doi:10.1086/208954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkleton, B. E., Weintraub Austin, E., Zhou, Y., Fitts Willoughby, J., & Reiser, M. (2012). Perceptions of news media, external efficacy, and public affairs in political decision making and disaffection. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(1), 23–39. doi:10.1177/1077699011428586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polletta, F., & Callahan, J. (2017). Deep stories, nostalgia narratives, and fake news: Storytelling in the Trump era. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 5, 392–408. doi:10.1057/s41290-017-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., van der Brug, W., & De Lange, S. L. (2016). Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., van der Brug, W., de Lange, S. L., & Parlevliet, J. (2017). Persuasive populism?: Estimating the effect of populist messages on political cynicism. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 136–145. doi:10.17645/pag.v5i4.1124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapals, A. K. (2018). Fake news: Australian and British journalists’ role perceptions in an era of “alternative facts”. Journalism Practice, 12, 967–985. doi:10.1080/17512786.2018.1511822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2006). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L. (2015). Antecedents to psychological reactance: The impact of threat, message frame, and dhoice. Health Communication, 30, 975–985. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.910882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, C., & Alexander, L. (2016, November 3). How teens in the Balkans are duping Trump supporters with fake news. Buzzfeed News. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/how-macedonia-became-a-global-hub-for-pro-trump-misinfo
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strutton, D., & Roswinanto, W. (2014). Can vague brand slogans promote desirable consumer responses? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(4), 282–294. doi:10.1108/JPBM-02-2014-0507
   Google Scholar
• Tamul, D. J., Holz-Ivory, A. H., Hotter, J. C., & Wolf, J. (2019a, July 31). Fake news I preregistration. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/W6MSV
   Google Scholar
• Tamul, D. J., Holz-Ivory, A. H., Hotter, J. C., & Wolf, J. (2019b, July 31). Fake news II preregistration. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/HY4V3
   Google Scholar
• Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.207.1360143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Duyn, E., & Collier, J. (2018). Priming and fake news: The effects of elite discourse on evaluations of news media. Mass Communication & Society. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon, P. (2018, June 18). Don’t shrug away Trump’s media attacks. Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/the_media_today/trump-media-enemy.php
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. (2016, November 13). Zuckerberg promises Facebook action over fake news. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-37967783
   Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., Arnold, S., & Baker, M. (1975). The effects of censorship on attitude change: The influence of censor and communication characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5(3), 227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillman, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotinoal behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 215–240). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar