Same Scandal, Different Standards: The Effect of Partisanship on Expectations of News Reports about Whistleblowers

References

• Aronow, P., Baron, J., & Pinson, L. (2019). A note on dropping experimental subjects who fail a manipulation check. Political Analysis, 27(4), 572–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, J., Schmidt, M., Goldman, A., & Benner, K. (September. 26, 2019). White house knew of whistleblower. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/26/us/politics/who-is-whistleblower.html
   Google Scholar
• Boeyink, D. E. (1990). Anonymous sources in news stories: Justifying exceptions and limiting abuses. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 5(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme0504_2
   Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., Druckman, J. N., & Cook, F. L. (2014). The influence of partisan motivated reasoning on public opinion. Political Behavior, 36(2), 235–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. (2011). On the condition of anonymity: Unnamed sources and the battle for journalism. University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In S. Chaiken & A. H. Eagly (Eds.), Unintended thought (p. 212). Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G. M., Curry, A., & Whipple, K. (2019). Building trust: What works for news organizations. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/building-trust
   Google Scholar
• Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2019). Validating the demographic, political, psychological, and experimental results obtained from a new source of online survey respondents. Research & Politics, 6(1), 2053168018822174. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168018822174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, H. M. (1978). Veiled attribution—An element of style? Journalism Quarterly, 55(3), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769907805500305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, A., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). The effects of journalistic transparency on credibility assessments and engagement intentions. Journalism, 20(2), 274–291. online first. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919850387
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, M., Culver, K. B., McLeod, D., & Kremmer, C. (2019). Don’t quote me: Effects of named, quoted, and partisan news sources. Journalism Practice, 13(9), 1128–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1588148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). Partisan differences in opinionated news perceptions: A test of the hostile media effect. Political Behavior, 33(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9139-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chaiken, S. (1994). The causes of hostile media judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S. (1999). Understanding party identification: A social identity approach. Political Psychology, 20(2), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. (1988). Attitude extremity and trust in media. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908806500203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C. (1998). The persuasive press inference: Effects of mass media on perceived public opinion. Communication Research, 25(5), 486–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365098025005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2006). Broad reach or biased source? Decomposing the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunther, A. C., McLaughlin, B., Gotlieb, M. R., & Wise, D. (2017). Who says what to whom: Content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, G. J., & Kim, H. (2011). Is the media biased against me? A meta-analysis of the hostile media effect research. Communication Research Reports, 28(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.565280
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Tanis, M. (2013). Examining the hostile media effect as an intergroup phenomenon: The role of ingroup identification and status. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 535–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoewe, J. (2017). Manipulation check. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–5). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masullo, G. M., Curry, A. L., Whipple, K. N., & Murray, C. (2021). The story behind the story: Examining transparency about the journalistic process and news outlet credibility. Journalism Practice, 1–19. Online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2020.1870529
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C., & Stroud, N. J. (2020). Testing behind the story cards. Center for Media Engagement. https://mediaengagement.org/research/behind-the-story-cards
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perryman, M. R. (2020). Where the other side gets news: Audience perceptions of selective exposure in the 2016 election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 32(1), 89–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, S. A. (2012). A self-categorization explanation for the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 381–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01647.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, M. (2016). The fabulist who changed journalism. Columbia Journalism Review, 54(4), 52–60. https://www.cjr.org/the_feature/the_fabulist_who_changed_journalism.php
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, K. M., Gunther, A. C., & Liebhart, J. L. (2004). Why partisans see mass media as biased. Communication Research, 31(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204269390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternadori, M. M., & Thorson, E. (2009). Anonymous sources harm credibility of all stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/073953290903000405
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, N. J., Muddiman, A., & Lee, J. K. (2014). Seeing media as group members: An evaluation of partisan bias perceptions. Journal of Communication, 64(5), 874–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S. (1998). Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Billic, M. (1974). Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(74)90064-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, M., & Vraga, E. K. (2017). Effectiveness of a news media literacy advertisement in partisan versus nonpartisan online media contexts. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(1), 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. (2007). The messenger overwhelming the message: Ideological cues and perceptions of bias in television news. Political Behavior, 29(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-007-9031-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallone, R. P., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 577. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2015). Media literacy messages and hostile media perceptions: Processing of nonpartisan versus partisan political information. Mass Communication and Society, 18(4), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2014.1001910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., & Rojas, H. (2009). Media literacy training reduces perception of bias. Newspaper Research Journal, 30(4), 68–81.
   Google Scholar