Engaging the Dark Side: Exploring Identification with Morally Complex Antagonists

References

• Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2009). Parasocial interaction and identification. In M. B. Oliver & R. Nabi (Eds.), The Sage handbook of media processes and effects (pp. 223–236). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Daalmans, S., & Johnson, B. K. (2017). Morality predicts enjoyment but not appreciation of morally ambiguous characters. Media Psychology, 20(3), 349–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1182030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, A., Tamborini, R., Grizzard, M., Lewis, R., Weber, R., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Repeated exposure to narrative entertainment and the salience of moral intuitions. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazer, R., Robinson, M., & Knobloch-Westerwick, S. (2021). Narratives’ impacts on attitudes: Do signaling of persuasive intent and fictionality matter? Communication Studies, 72(3), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1876127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., Ahn, C., Huang, J., Walton, J., McAllister, C., & Eden, A. (2020). Validating the extended character morality questionnaire. Media Psychology, 23(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2019.1572523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Huang, J., Ahn, C., Fitzgerald, K., Francemone, C. J., & Walton, J. (2020). The Gordian Knot of disposition theory: Character morality and liking. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 32(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000257
   Google Scholar
• Grizzard, M., Huang, J., Fitzgerald, K., Ahn, C., & Chu, H. (2018). Sensing heroes and villains: Character-schema and the disposition formation process. Communication Research, 45(4), 479–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2007). The moral mind: How 5 sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), The innate mind (Vol. 3, pp. 367–391). Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicke, S. H., & Raney, A. A. (2015). Exploring the role of identification and moral disengagement in the enjoyment of an antihero television series. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 40(4), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2015-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience- taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E. L., Ritchie, T. D., & Igou, E. R. (2015). Zeroing in on heroes: A prototype analysis of hero features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleemans, M., Eden, A., Daalmans, S., van Ommen, M., & Weijers, A. (2017). Explaining the role of character development in the evaluation of morally ambiguous characters in entertainment media. Poetics, 60, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Robinson, M., Frazer, R., & Schutz, E. (2020). “Affective news” and attitudes: A multi-topic experiment of attitude impacts from political news and fiction. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 107769902093288. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020932883
   Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2015). The dual role of morally ambiguous characters: Examining the effect of morality salience on narrative responses. Human Communication Research, 41(3), 390–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krakowiak, K. M., & Tsay-Vogel, M. (2018). Are good characters better for us? The effect of morality salience on entertainment selection and recovery outcomes. Mass Communication and Society, 21(3), 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1407797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magliano, J. P., Taylor, H. A., & Hyun-Jeong, J. K. (2005). When goals collide: Monitoring the goals of multiple characters. Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1357–1367. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, N. L. (2019). Detecting the boundaries of disposition bias on moral judgments of media characters’ behaviors using social judgment theory. Journal of Communication, 69(4), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, Y., & Neubaum, G. (2019). Gratifying ambiguity: Psychological processes leading to enjoyment and appreciation of TV series with morally ambiguous characters. Mass Communication and Society, 22(5), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2019.1614195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a theory of entertainment persuasion: Explaining the persuasive effects of entertainment–education messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. B., Bilandzic, H., Cohen, J., Ferchaud, A., Shade, D. D., Bailey, E. J., & Yang, C. (2019). A penchant for the immoral: Implications of parasocial interaction, perceived complicity, and identification on liking of anti-heroes. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 169–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A. (2004). Expanding disposition theory: Reconsidering character liking, moral evaluations, and enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 348–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00319.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, A. A., Schmid, H., Niemann, J., & Ellensohn, M. (2009, May). Testing affective disposition theory: A comparison of the enjoyment of hero and antihero narratives [Paper presented]. The annual meeting of the international communication association, Chicago, IL. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Julia-Niemann/publication/274710596_Testing_Affective_Disposition_Theory_A_comparison_of_the_enjoyment_of_hero_and_antihero_narratives/links/5af9319baca2720af9eec897/Testing-Affective-Disposition-Theory-A-comparison-of-the-enjoyment-of-hero-and-antihero-narratives.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. S. (2010). Making a good (bad) impression: Examining the cognitive processes of disposition theory to form a synthesized model of media character impression formation. Communication Theory, 20(2), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, D. M., & Raney, A. A. (2012). Exploring how we enjoy antihero narratives. Journal of Communication, 62(6), 1028–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Gleason, L. S. (2012). Contributing to theory and knowledge in quantitative communication science. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(4), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.732626
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., Johnson, B. K., Cohen, J., Leonora, M. G., & Ewoldsen, D. R. (2014). Temporarily expanding the boundaries of the self: Motivations for entering the story world and implications for narrative effects. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00265.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R. (2012). Model of intuitive morality and exemplars. In R. Tamborini (Ed.), Media and the moral mind (pp. 43–74). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Eden, A., Bowman, N. D., Grizzard, M., Weber, R., & Lewis, R. J. (2013). Predicting media appeal from instinctive moral values. Mass Communication and Society, 16(3), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2012.703285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamborini, R., Grall, C., Prabhu, S., Hofer, M., Novotny, E., Hahn, L., Klebig, B., Kryston, K., Baldwin, J., Aley, M., & Sethi, N. (2018). Using attribution theory to explain the affective dispositions of tireless moral monitors toward narrative characters. Journal of Communication, 68(5), 842–871. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsay, M., & Krakowiak, K. M. (2011). The impact of perceived character similarity and identification on moral disengagement. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJART.2011.037773
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D. (2000). Basal morality in drama appreciation. In I. Bondebjerg (Ed.), Moving images, culture and the mind (pp. 53–63). University of Luton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. (1976). A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In T. Chapman & H. Foot (Eds.), Humor and laughter: Theory, research, and application (pp. 93–115). John Wiley.
   Google Scholar